the state talks about the robson case. johnson versus robson that the state only needs to show that the inclusion of the excluded group shows a further inclusion but the state is misriding that and the court found that the line drawn there rationally distinguished between the two groups, that there was good reasons why conscientious objectors could be denied veterans benefits but veterans could not. the court ruled that the groups were not similarly situated in respect to those benefits. in klebor, it failed because the, quote, purported justification for the ordinance made no sense in how the law treated other similarly situated in important respects. and here this is the problem that we have with the biology of the rationale, michigan allows single, gay and lesbians to adopt. it allows donor sperm and artificial insemination so it doesn't further any of those ties. remember, cases are struck down under rational basis that are riddled with exceptions. so the ban doesn't logically fit that rationale. time procreation to ma