>> >> roderick insists he is innocent.he marijuana was found in a car near where he was standing, not on him and that it is definitely not his. >> my probation sister told me a couple times i've been one of her best people. if i was doing so good, why would i let some marijuana mess up my life? >> a lot of the kids that come here they're repeat offenders. core of them you lose. they end up dead, burned up on the railroad tracks, murdered. just random gunfire. if you can change one child, then you made a difference. >> these are kids who have seen things and gone through things certainly you know, beyond what most of us have ever experienced. so what i try and do is getting is the court to recognize that these are still kids and kids who have made mistakes, maybe more than a lot of us are used to but they are able to learn and rehabilitate. so my hope and goal with all of these kids is that the system works. and that we get them the help they need so they can go on and at least live a productive life. >> i want to talk to y

businessmen like former ceo cyrus freidheim jr., who later led the sun-times media group, and board member rodericka former chairman of the securities and exchange commission. the decision created a furor in colombia. the country's prosecutor general said he would begin his own investigation, and has threatened to extradite some of chiquita's executives to stand trial in colombia. >> this hearing will come to order. >> there was also a congressional investigation, led by representative william delahunt of massachusetts, who chaired a house foreign affairs subcommittee in 2008. you've been quoted as saying that chiquita is the tip of the iceberg. >> right. >> what do you mean by that? >> well, i think that there are other american companies that have conducted themselves the same way that chiquita has, except they haven't been caught. >> how many companies? >> well, there are several. >> you want to share that with us? >> no. >> because? >> because i want to give those companies an opportunity to come before the committee. >> we did find one person who was willing to name names inside this maximum s

this is roderick. what are we seeing here? of look. >> no disrespect to lee martin. >> he has great style but we think he can do a little bit better. so here we have roderick in this great washed cotton dress shirt. it's super casual because this is really lightweight, kind of wrinkly. you don't have to worry about keeping it really pressed. we love the plaid. plaid's really cool. we have it dressed up with a tie from thalia. you can get those at macy's for like 50 bucks. it's a nice way to mix it up. it's more fitted, adds more color and it looks great. we also have it with -- one of the things we have -- take away the jeans from before and have these great levi's 511. they are not skinny jeans. these are a slim jean, which is a little more fitted. in the black, this is cleaner than the other jean. >> roderick, looking good. this is trey. man, do we see this a lot walking around on the weekends. >> this is a definite default. men love to put on the sweats and the track pants. what we've done -- you know, that's fine for the g

the room that might have complete opposite voting records on occasionally, but there was still, roderick. we would get up -- we would --ill have comraderie. cammarata read. tom marauderry -- re--- cammarata re--- camaraderie. we would get up and do it again the next day. when you empower people to do their job and get it done, you emerge from that stronger. for some reason there seems to be a lack of that in this day and age. dirk made another good point. you do not need a middle ground, just a willingness to sit down and make tough decisions about major pieces of legislation. though lacking in this day and age is that every vote, every speech made is recorded and given out to all the different groups. you may not even say something the way you meant to say it. people portray it as if you're trying to cut benefits or medicare and your supporting-- you're supporting something that will be on a tv commercial or some kind of at back home. it is unfortunate all of that is used against everyone almost on an hourly basis. many years ago we do not have this instantaneous reporting and debating.

the room that might have complete opposite voting records on occasionally, but there was still, roderick. we would get up -- we would conramraderie.otter we would get up and do it again the next day. when you empower people to do your job and get it done, emerge from that stronger. for some reason there seems to be a lack of that in this day and age. point.ade another good you do not need a middle ground, just a willingness to sit down and make tough decisions about major pieces of legislation. though lacking in this day and age is that every vote, every andch made is recorded given out to all the different groups. you may not even say something the way you meant to say it. people portray it as if you're trying to cut benefits or medicare and your supporting something that will be on a tv commercial or some kind of at back home. it is unfortunate all of that is almost onst everyone an hourly basis. many years ago we do not have this instantaneous reporting and debating. unfortunately, a lot of people are working the internet all the time. who does not get a million e- mails every day fro