timing of this is helpful mayjust be a coincidence, but if paula vennells had been told about roderick williamsat he acquired that day about the mounting concerns, the abject failure of the post office, to instruct gareth jenkins properly, that would make perfect sense. but, of course, what is undeniable is that those e—mails reflecting the view occurred one week of the consultation. should the review reveal any concerns about horizon or branch accounting processes, the post office may be obliged under criminal procedure rules to proactively pass this information to suppose masters. both ongoing and historic. why did the tendrils of the post office civil lawyers infiltrate, entwine, clench, even, we say, suffocate the criminal disclosure process? why was mr altman to be walked through the civil implications of disclosure by womble von dickinson. why were cartwright king to be kept apprised of civil claims? so many unanswered questions. but i now go to paragraph 209 of the post office written submissions where we are talking about the engagement with the cc rc. and that paragraph 209, the post o