. >> hi, i am rodney greavy, and as my attorney mentioned, there were two sets of plans. there were the approved plans in the file and plans at the site that were altered. i am reading a quote from mr. sweeney that says that they altered the plans after getting the plants back from the city. that was clear from the building inspection commission. this has been going on a long time. i have spent a lot of time and money on this. there are conditions that are out of character for the neighborhood. they are large. they are out of scale. they take up 60% of the rear yard set back, and they are not compliant with the codes. the fact that the appellant is suggesting that a legally -- a l -- a legal addition is done 10 years after the sinkhole, that is ridiculous. the home is more than 5000 square feet. they are there often. they do have a house in nevada, but they have chosen for some point not to live there. the of built well beyond what was approved, will be for what their house was before the sinkhole incident -- beyond what was approved, well beyond what their house was befo