we' will roe v. wade itself be upheld, we can't say. >> and so the idea that these laws are for protecting women, georgia has among the highest maternal mortality rates in the united states, i mean rates that are comparable to developing countries. and where is the focus on that? where is the focus on really making medicare -- medical assistance available? half of our counties don't even have an ob/gyn, a place for women to get prenatal care. so this idea this is about protecting women is completely belied by the fact of where the focus is. the focus is on controlling womens ability to make their private decisions and not on enhancing maternal health. this bill does damage to maternal health. it does damage to the opportunities that women even who want healthy children have to continue that. we've had obgyn's training in georgia say they will not practice here under these kind of strestricks because they are not supportive of promoting maternal health. >> michael, i just want to hear what you have to answ

before roe v. wade when women were criminalized, doctors were criminalized, we don't have that data to show exactly how many women died because they didn't have access to safe, legal abortions. but is that really the point? is it saying that, if 100 women died it's not a big deal, but if 1000 women died, it's a big deal? we need to value women's lives and stop stigmatizing one aspect of health care and using that as oppressionrpetuate and misogyny. joining thank you for us for "newsmakers" this week -- for joining us for "newsmakers" this week. let's go back to the surveys. andrist came out this week it digs deeply into the divide, which was not gender-based but very deeply party-based. what was interesting about the numbers is the huge dichotomy between democratic women and republican women on this issue, more so than even democratic men and republican men. what does this do for the debate in 2020? it is interesting because if you look at what politicians are running on, it is specifically along the li

i understand the importance that people attach to the roe v. wadeion, to the plannedod parenthoersus casey decision i don't live in a bubble i understandn i live ie real world >> seth: man, it's so weird to see someone who is capable of losing his [ bleep ] like that suddenly calm and measured it's like seeing a crazy g in the subway screaming, "rats controlled by the government are spying on us."tu and then hs to you and says, "by the way, that jacket looks fantastic. [ laughter ] second, kavanaugouwas lying roe v. wade. and we all know he was lying, because he said the exact opposite in an e-mail when he worked for the bush administrati >> somebody leaked to the "new york times" and then to nbc news this e-mail written by brett kavanaugh in 2003 in which he argues explicitly that roe versus wade is not recognized to be settled law, because the supreme court could very well overturn it.ur quote, "i am notthat all legal scholars refer to roe as the settled law of the land at the supreme court level since court can always overrule its precedent and t

>> isopropyl roe v. wade, it's a president that decides the entire issue. i support roe v. de and believe it should be codified. it's been over 30 years, as president of the united states, i will not appoint justice who does not see roe v wade as president. second, i will codify roe v. wade so it's forever law of the land. third, i will repeal the height amendment, it's a moment in law that makes it impossible for low income women to access security need and forth, i will make sure no matter what state you live in you have access to reproductive care including abortion services. >> i want to ask you about that about your first statement which is you will only appoint. i will only appoint judges who will uphold roe v. wade. does that mean you're okay with other presidents having their own list test, as president might say all only appoint people who will overturn roe v wade because a conjured under tradition in this country is the independence of the judiciary and the ideas that a judge once appointed will judge each case on its merits and on the basis of a promise made polit

to go onit is time offense with roe v. wade. to say we aregh going to rely on the courts. we need to pass a federal law to make roe v. wade the rule of the land. [applause] that,derstand when we do we can add and say and no more of this semi-repeal. take another bite out of it. taken undercut of it. we are going to make it the law, let's make it the law for real again. that means access across the board. [applause] >> we have a person in the audience who wants to ask you a question. she is a productive rights powerhouse. she has been a driving force behind the south carolina coalition for healthy families growth. she is a member of the state innovation exchange reproduction freedom leadership council advisory board. andis my partner legislature at the statehouse. let's hear from ashley. hello senator warren. i am from columbia south carolina. i want to welcome you to our state. i want to give you some background. i am a proud south carolinian and i have been working in sexual and reproductive health for almost a decade. this is

i say it is time to go on offense with roe v. wade. gh to say we are going to rely on the courts. pass a federal law to make roe v. wade the role of the land. [applause] that when we do that, we can add and say, no .ore of this semi-repeal take another bite out of it. make it the law. let's make up the raw for real again. and expand access across the board. >> she is a productive rights powerhouse. shehas been a driving force is a member of the state and a basin campaign. and she is my partner in legislature at the statehouse. >> hello senator warren. i am from columbia south carolina. i want to welcome you to our state. i want to give you some background. i am a proud south carolinian and i have been working in sexual and reproductive health for almost a decade. this is a battleground state. i want to did he background of what it's like to access care here. 11 of our 46 counties have no ob/gyn provider. not a single one. we're consistently being attacked for our providers of choice through executive orders, medicaid waivers, and consta

so, of course, that is upon the overturning of roe v. wade. retroactive from the point of the vote on tuesday. >> ed: how does it move forward, though? despite your personal views roe v. wade is currently the law of the land. so women have that choice. what will happen in east texas? >> roe v. wade is an unjust, lawless court opinion. it's not the supreme court that makes laws. it's congress. our message, the ordinance is clear that the supreme court was wrong on roe v. wade. so we are challenging that in this ordinance. we are going to uphold what we believe is right. >> ed: now, last question. there is a poll in the "wall street journal" suggesting recently that the strongest ma majority for abortion rights exists in america now. you are standing on principle and maybe you don't care about the polls because you think it's the right thing to do. what do you say to the pollsters about this? >> ultimately, at the end of the day we have to do what is right. i am reminded by a statement from thomas jefferson who said the supreme court is supposed

elizabeth warren saying that the majority of people support roe v. wade. t's listen to what elizabeth warren said. and i want you to comment on it. >> 47 years ago, roe versus wade was decided. we've looked to the courts all that time, as state after state has undermined roe, put in exceptions. we now have an america where most people support roe versus wade. we need to make that federal law. >> fact-check that for us, allen. >> polling shows that most americans do support roe v. wade. the real debate over abortion comes on limits. this is a lot of the stuff that republicans are trying to do in state legislatures. we've seen more extreme laws like alabama, outlawing abortion outright. that's threatening roe v. wade as a whole. most americans support the law and support abortion in general. but polling differs when it comes to a limit on abortions and what that limit is. >> that's what is so difficult when you have 60 seconds to answer a question, it seems. >> something that caught my ear. you have jay inslee. he said he was the first leader to create a publ

. >> and you wrote about roe v. wade. i want to k you about one part of an article you wrote about roe v. wade, d cause you said that you're not woabout rights being whittled away, that you're not worried about the future of roe v. wade,at nce you have rights, they can't be taken away. do you believe that? >> not as much as i used to. >> why? >> because of at's happening, what's happening in texas and ohio and abortions. so i'm not as confident about what i wrote then.th i feel that law, specifically roe v. wade, is concrete one, and it's very long ago, so the idea of revisiting it, i don't know what state we arein ith the supreme court. i think we're all waiting to find out exactly how this works out. but i do believe that it is our responsibility to rise up to the occasion and to stick our necks out when it's called for because f so many peopght for us and that's the reason why we have all the rights we do, so we need to keep that torch going. >> when did you become mobilized topolitical activism? >> after the election.

toartment of justice determine whether it complies with the constitution of the united states and roe v. wade sen. harris: that is called preclearance. pleaaw has to go through -- preclearance 30 department of justice. -- through the department of justice. that law is determined to be in compliance with roe v. wade and its progeny. without it can't go into effect. there have to be checks and balances in the system. it cannot be incumbent on the leaders who are in the community and the organizations. also have to they be responsible for the united states government to your point. and the leaders within your government, to take a stand and stand with women and stand with their constitutional rights. power.t only about it's also about the law. it's about the spirit and the behind thehe ideals writing of the constitution of the u.s. and its amendments. i grew up as a college student at howard university and i would often walk by the united states supreme court in all of it. awe of this building with its inscribedd the words in that marble that read equal justice under law. issuee talk about the t

but remember, he's a strong supporter of roe v. wade. supreme court nominee, justice -- i mean judge robert bork, because of his views on his opposition to roe v. wade as the law of the land. and the president, strong supporter -- vice president, strong supporter of roe v. wade. >> he also evolved from civil unions to full same-sex marriage rights and helped the former president do that as well. but listen, that aside, i understand, but that aside, what -- joe biden's appeal to the american people is that steady hand and that he is that steady hand, or could be that steady hand come 2020. does that -- him changing his mind on issues like the hyde amendment, does he contradict that? >> no. i any that people want, one is a steady hand but two, they want authenticity. and he's authentic. and i think people that watched him deliver his statement yesterday could tell that it was from the heart and that he is deeply troubled by the assault on women's right to choose. and so a leader, i think it's a real profile in courage for what he did. beca

i say it is time to go on offense with roe v. wade. it is not enough to say we are going to rely on the courts. pass a federal law to make roe v. wade the role of the land. [applause] that when we do that, we can add and say, no .ore of this semi-repeal take another bite out of it. make it the law. let's make up the raw for real again. and expand access across the board. >> she is a productive rights powerhouse. shehas been a driving force is a member of the state and a basin campaign. and she is my partner in legislature at the statehouse. >> hello senator warren. i am from columbia south carolina. i want to welcome you to our state. i want to give you some background. i am a proud south carolinian and i have been working in sexual and reproductive health for almost a decade. this is a battleground state. i want to did he background of what it's like to access care here. 11 of our 46 counties have no ob/gyn provider. not a single one. we're consistently being attacked for our providers of choice through executive orders, medicaid waive

blaster judge brett kavanauaugh appeared before the judiciary committee and asked about roe v. waden his confirmation hearing. >> one of the important things to keep in mind about roe v. wade is that it has been reaffirmed many times over the past 45 years, as you know. and most prominently, most importantly, reaffirmed in planned parenthood versus caseyy in 1990 two. amy: so that was brett kavanaugh before he became supreme court justice. he was approved. it is officially the roberts court, some call it now the kavanaugh court. what does it mean what he saidd andnd where o you see the supreme court going right now? >> i don't think we can give a lot of credence to what people say confirmation hearings. they tend to say what they think the senate wants to be heard. see thismously said, i as an oak park, calling balls and strikes. think we can say from that cap and i would not vote overturn roe v wade. for a long time we have had one justice in the middle thomas went justice, o'connor, then kennedy, who although conservatitive, have not been lg to pull the trigger to overturn roe v.v

the third thing would be to codify roe v. wadesomething we can actually put into law and put judges in place that will actually follow the law. it is that simple. i want to step back from the ark we are on. i started on this journey when i was a prosecutor. there have been a lot of battles in minnesota on reproductive rights, abortion rights, as in our neighboring states of north dakota and south o dakota. my job was public safety. our job was to protect the clinics. it was at a time when there were violent attacks on clinics in my own state and other places across the country. then i got to the senate. at the time, there was not a lot of talk about taking away women's rights. we would have votes, then barack became president. we went through those eight years. now we are where we are now. it has never been more important for me and my public rights to stand up. i want to leave you with the thought of this arc we are on right now and how when the president does something bad, or something horrible on women's rights or healthcare,

he's a strong supporter off roe v. wade. tice robert burke because of his views as opposition to roe v. wade. >> and same-sex marriage rights and helped the former president do that as well. i understand. but that aside what joe biden's appeal how to marecamerican peos they believe and need a steady hand. he could be that steady hand come 2020. does that dash him changing his mind on issues like the hyde amendment, does he contradict that? >> no. i think the thing people want. one is a steady hand and two they want authenticity. and people who watched him deliver his statement yesterday could tell that it was from the heart and that he is deeply troubled by the assault on women's rights to choose. and so a leader dash i think it's a real profile incurage. he had to change a position he's held for the last 40 years. for those people that want to eliminate the hyde amendment, first off all we have to win back the senate. and what helps us win back the senate is vice president biden's nomination as the it president noman. he'll

criteria apply if even they think it was widely decided as they may have done when they upheld roe v. wadethe decision isn't unworkable, those are the three criteria and going to be hugely important along with an overwhelming question you identified, so important, ali, of the chief justice and his concern about institutional legitimacy. >> jeffrey rosen, my pleasure to see you tonight. thank you for joining us. >> jeffrey rosen, my pleasure to see you tonight. thank you for joining us. that is tonight's "last word." "the 11th hour with brian williams" starts right now. >>> tonight, donald trump on the defensive getting still more cover from his attorney general as his justice department defies a court order concerning contact with the russians. >>> plus, as democrats debate their next move, a look at the ways congress could move forward in building their case. >>> ahead for us tonight, some perspective on an eventful week that saw robert mueller break his silence with decidedly mixed results and saw the president attack a modern day american war hero. >>> also an update tonight on the late

this is a full assault on roe v. wade.'s what we are increasingly seeing from states. >> let's talk about the states that do have the so-called heartbeat law. we got them in missouri and kentucky and mississippi and ohio and in georgia. there are other lawsuits that are being planned. if this is a death by a thousand paper cuts on roe v. wade, are these lawsuits effective way to push back against that? >> well, i think absolutely. what we have seen is that these particular laws have been passed largely since justice brett kavanaugh joins the supreme court that none of them have gone into effect. litigation has been enormously effective at protecting a women's right to choose. other heartbeat laws and even more restricted laws that came out of alabama where there was no exception for rape and incense. they have again not gone into effect. the question is what's going to happen while these state laws work their way up the judicial system? i think that the supreme court has been we have seen united in their desperation to avo

think this will be back, indiana case is essentially that this is an issue not contemplated by roe v. wadehild to have so if a mother gets prenatal testing shows, she is pregnant with a girl and wanted aboy or that fetus may have gen blindness something like that does intent matter does that allow her to terminate the pregnancy? just thomas' suggestion needs to perchlorate more can be read if another state other than indiana does not have a law like this they may revisit to create much laws to bring it back to the supreme court. >> do you read significance aaleeious didn't have have allies alito, gorsuch with him. >> the only justice on record, for saying roe v. wade should be overturned has done many in defense, this term and encouraging trick to be outspoken we should cake cases i wouldn't read mutual into it other than justice roberts just roberts is trying to form a consensus on the court, bringing justice kagan, briar gorsuch other conservatives on a variety of issues not -- to worry about polarizing the country. >> there isporization on abortion for sure if on roe, 54-right. >> i don

and they support roe v. wade as the law of the land, as do i. we support a woman's right to make these decisions about her own baud aconsistent with roe v. wade. the hyde amendment is something that has gotten in the way of that as it relates to certain women and their ability to get health care. so i think this hyde amendment issue lines up with where people are ultimately around the question of choice and roe v. wade. so i think the vice president, you know, finally moved to the right spot on this. >> okay, so you're of the same mind-set -- final question, what do you say to a person who might be pro-choice but recognizes there's some fundamental unfairness to forcing a taxpayer dollar from a pro-life person pay for an abortion? >> look, i think there's a lot of things that the federal government does, and not every single citizen agrees with everything the federal government does in every respect. so i just think we've got to go back to this notion that roe v. wade is the law of the land. and in my opinion it should be defended and supported.

roe versus wade. >> number one, roe v. wade's the law of the land, a woman has a right to choose. >> reporter: but now he's under fire from other democrats amid revelations he still supports a controversial abortion law, the hyde amendment, which bans using federal funds for abortion services, except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother critics say the law prevents low-income women from access to abortion. >> the hyde amendment is wrong i think that we have a nation where all these insidious things are being done to undermine women's reproductive rights in this country. >> this isn't about the politics this is about what's right. the hyde amendment should not be american law. >> reporter: biden's views on abortion have evolved. a devout catholic, he repeatedly voted against exemptions for victims of rape and incest during his early days in the senate on the hyde amendment, biden's campaign tells nbc news he would be open to repealing it, if abortion avenues that are currently protected under roe v. wa

these cases that will eventually wind up in the supreme court and we'll see a reexamination of roe v. wadenservative majority in the supreme court. >> to that point, we know from talking with you and jeffrey toobin and other legal experts, that there has been for a number of years actually a plan in place by folks who would like to see roe v. wade overturned, to start with these cases with an ultimate goal of getting one or more to the supreme court in a way that then would force a decision, a second decision, really, on roe v. wade. >> yes, and you're exactly right about that, erica. if you look at different states, you will see that different approaches are being used. obviously in missouri they're talking about the need for a second pelvic exam. in other states, there are other procedures, we've heard about fetal heartbeat laws being used. there are a number of approaches being used to give the supreme court a reason to take a second look at roe v. wade. >> we'll continue to follow all of them. paul, thank you, we appreciate it. >>> ahead, democrats reaching out to voters in critical st

recent shift according to pollster. 77% of americans say they would like the supreme court to uphold roe v. wade. 21% believe protections should be expanded and 16% said leave it alone. 14%, however, want to keep roe with some restrictions and s13% believe it should be overturned. >> joining us now from wachl washington, political reporter for the hill, julia manchester. >> good morning. >> geoff was reading some of these polls. mrk stands on abortion rights as we are seeing a shift there. how could this potentially impact the 2020 presidential race? we've already seen it with a shift within joe biden's campaign. where else could we see shifts on this? >> i've actually been talking to various democratic and conservative groups, pro-choice and pro-life groups. this is going to be a huge base turnout ahead of 2020. pro-choice groups are really looking to target pro-choice voters, women in particular, with these increased restrictions that we're seeing in states such as alabama and missouri. on the pro-choice side we're seeing republicans tout president trump's appointments of various conservative

[cheering] no president has a further impact since roe v. wade. by nominating justices and judges that will be strong for life. our goal for 2020 will be to reelect president donald trump to withstand in the senate and build up the caucus and house of representatives. >> sba is advancing three pro-life protection but save unborn children, care for women and importantly challenge roe. they include the capable bill, the overturning of the supreme court decision, and passing laws with disability discrimination abortion. legal experts believe these are three policy areas most likely to be considered by the current court. >> the placement of the 20 week team capable bill, several election cycles ago was getting it to the court and testing the will of the american people and the supreme court on whether this should stand or not. looking at the decision, what are the circumstances in which an abortion can her and how far does it have to be. last there', there is a strong t across the country right now for non- discrimination abortion walls. if that piece

the supreme court was wrong then as it was wrong in roe v. wade. back and see that roe v. wade was the good case of our day. >> quick reaction to netflix, disney's ceo talking about withdrawing their productions, movies and television from georgia because of the heartbeat law in that statement yet and prevented. think they will take up production if they implement it. >> i would say let them go and don't let the door hit them on the backside if you know what i mean. for disney to do this when their whole market is children, they want to murder and support the murder of their future audience, that is not only not good morals, it's not good business either. they are insane, blinded by evil in their support of the worship. >> you have the last word here tonight. we wouldn't have it any other way. >> check out his new show, pathway to victory, debuts fox nation june 10. up next, your trump start back against mexico for failing to stop illegal immigration, your legal drugs and prevent the deaths of tens of thousands of americans to opioid overdose deaths

even the people who are fighting abortion and want to overturn roe v. wadenow very well that if roe v. wade were to be overturned rich women would continue to get abortions, they would get safe abortions, and everyone else would be going back to the days of the back alley abortions where, make no mistake about it -- and this is more harmed and some died. if you are a certain one which is represented economically today by that 1%, then government serves you. this is why the deeper existential question of our time these women --ut this is an attack on our democracy, this is an attack on the idea that government is either for everybody, or what it has now become. we have health care, we have reproductive freedom, we have all of the things all of us want as long as you are among a few of the people. it, youer believe better believe -- and this is why i believe, i don't think we should vote for a person just based on their gender. issues, we of these just get something deeper. we get something at a deeper level. biget the games that are and blunt. you better beli

v. wade and one is going to be for maintaining roe v. wade. >> you don't think there is a voter that is going to say, ah, but he's not for the hyde amendment anymore i'm out? >> i don't think so. i think it's roe v. wade do you want it the law of this country or go back to the time where women and doctors would be criminalized and women would be going through very unsafe procedures? so i think that is going to be the defining -- i think joe biden will be fine in that space protecting roe v. wade as part of his campaign as will all the other candidates. >> you seem nervous he'll take too many hits. >> well, he is going to take some hits. but, you know, that's the deal. he knows what the deal is. he's taken hits before and not made it. so if, i think so far by and large on the scale of one to ten i'd give him about an eight in terms of how well he has been disciplined and how he stayed on the money. i thought the way he handled the protester contrasting how he handled the protester in his rallies with trump. that's what the middle of americ

>> roe v. wadew for the lower courts so it's disingenuous when he hear supreme court justices saying roe is the law on the books. the supreme court has the capacity to overturn roe. they have overturned precedents that are as old as roe. i don't think anyone should be fooling themselves that they are prepared to overturn. >> rebecca? >> absolutely. the question is how urgent of an issue will this be for democratic voters? i think what we're seeing in the polling suggests that because of the supreme court, this has become incredibly urgent. that's why joe biden. >> a huge issue in the 2020 campaign. more news coming up. a near collision at sea, the ships coming so close that american sailors could see their russian counterparts sunbathing. and new developments in an alleged terror plot targeting times square in new york city. at fidelity, those zeros really add up. ♪ maybe i'll win, saved by zero ♪ you know those butterflies aren't actually in the room? hey, that baker lady's on tv again. she's not a

multiple members of congress on both sides of the aisle, but he has been a strong supporter of roe v. wadenversation is about today. we are seeing the systemic rollback not only of roe v. wade but also the affordable care act, which really is preventing people from getting access. so to me my first thing is to just say i'm pleased to see this is where we have landed. >> okay. so, you know, as you say, he has given a lot of thought to this broader issue over the years. he has talked about it. he talked about abortion when he talks about that topic he always talks about his faith. >> my religion defines who i am. and i've been a practicing catholic my whole life. you know, there's even been disagreement in our church, not that abortion is always wrong. but there's been -- there is debate. >> so how does that change, right? i mean he says faith is the core of who i am and how the decisions are made. now he says it's become about access to abortion. i know you support the change. but are you okay with the change in his method? >> you know, the reality to me is that it's not an either or. i do

president, he said, i am going to appoint justices to the supreme court who will vote to overturn roe v. wadeat was, he was going to appoint justices to the supreme court who were going to vote to overturn roe v. wade, and that's what they're going to do, soon rather than later. >> everybody, stick around. there's more news we're following, including some very harrowing video that shows u.s. and russian warships nearly colliding. tonight, both sides are blaming each other. do the pictures, though, reveal which ship is at fault? >>> and later, another blast after angry anytime calling from kim jong-un's regime after a pentagon report labels north korea a rogue state. (paul) great. another wireless ad. so many of them are full of this complicated, tricky language about their network and offers and blah blah blah. look. sprint's going to do things differently. and let you decide for yourself. they're offering a new 100% total satisfaction guarantee. try it out and see the savings. if you don't love it, get your money back. see? simple. now sprint's unlimited plan comes with one of the newest pho

. >> reporter: joe biden has long supported roe umersus wade. >> nber one, roe v wade is the law of the maand. a wohas the right to choose. >> reporter: now he's coming under fire from other democrats amid revelations he still supports a controversial abortion law. the hyde amendment that bans using deral funds for abortion cases except in cases of rape, insist or to save the life of the mother. critics sae law prevents low income women from access to abortion. >> the hyde amendment is wrong. i think that we have a nation where all tse sidious things are being done to undermine women's reproductive rights in the country country.i counys c >> this isn't about politics but what's right. the hyde amendment should not be american law. >> reporter: a deve tholic, he repeatedly voted against exceptions for victims of rape and insissteststist. incest.cest. on the hyde amendment, biden's campaign said he's open to appealing it if avenues protected under roe v wade were threatened. joe biden's position is very much in line with the general electret. 58% of americans support keeping the hyde amen

state without any abortion provider since the passage of roe v. wade in 1973. is one of nine states that could challenge roe v. wade in the supreme court. and joining us now, katie phang and ashley merchant. good saturday morning to you both. this judge in st. louis, missouri, granted a temporary restraining order to planned parenthood. the judge made clear he's taking no sides here and thought this case warranted something of a further hearing. what do you think happens in court on tuesday? >> you're right, alex. the judge has not picked a side. planned parenthood won this skirmish. on tuesday morning at 9:00 a.m., the judge will conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine if a preliminary injunction, or the entry of an order that would allow the clinic to remain open, if that should be entered on tuesday. that is literally planned parenthood meeting legal standarsta standasta standards to keep its door open. planned parenthood would be able to provide. you want to make sure the purpose behind closing the doors of this clinic is not pretextual. according to th

the 1st of many things which seem to be quite contradiction to the case roe v wade which is being decided by the supreme court i believe it's extremely unfair and on precedented that there are going to try to charge her for manslaughter or the loss of her child in an altercation has not been heard before and it seems as if the state of alabama is trying to test new orders i don't think the outrage is going to have the state of alabama to reconsider those absolutely not i think in fact the outrage is what they're looking for water to in my place to see this case possibly overturn roe v wade so i think they're counting on the outrage. a u.s. congresswoman has been accused of staging photos next to a migrant detention center for children in a bid to highlight the only going to military in crisis in the region the actual pictures were taken last year in texas but of only know the surface to alexandria ocasio cortez is shown near a chain link fence looking upset over critics have pointed out that the watch will migrants can be seen featured on that she appears to be facing an empty parking lot

roe v. wadeows. it currently would almost certainly not allow the alabama law and possibly some of the heartbeat bills to stand. they will be immediately enjoined, and while i wish they would go into law, they are not. we -- with the whole nation is looking to find a point where the supreme court will say, these are the basic things we think is legitimate legislate. the overturning of roe v. wade, we want to happen. what is likely to happening -- happen is there will be a chipping away and more middle ground abortion attractions will come into law. host: let's talk to rebecca who is calling from ohio on the republican line. good morning. caller: good morning. i did not know there was an entity in the white house that , i am so abortion pleased to hear that. our country is divided on this issue. republican, and just as a woman, i love god, and to me, premeditated murder, that is how i look at it. i know it is abrasive, but that is how i look for it. i appreciate alabama taking the stand, and the w

. >> what do you make of justice ginsburg's reply to clarence thomas issuing another warning roe v. wadeeopardy. >> one most interesting thing about it language shows how on the court the left and the right, are just as polarized as americans are throughout his concurrent upon justice thomas talks about mother and child, and just ginsburg explicitly pushes walk says a woman who terminates a pregnancy is not a mother some stark language is most interesting, but i think this will be back, indiana case is essentially that this is an issue not contemplated by roe v. wade, not weather to have a child but whichchild to have so if a mother gets prenatal testing shows, she is pregnant with a girl and wanted aboy or that fetus may have gen blindness something like that does intent matter does that allow her to terminate the pregnancy? just thomas' suggestion needs to perchlorate more can be read if another state other than indiana does not have a law like this they may revisit to create much laws to bring it back to the supreme court. >> do you read significance aaleeious didn't have have allies

was the first presidential candidate to pledge i will only nominate justices and judges who see roe v. wades a precedent. i am also going to codify -- roe and i will repeal hyde so all women get access to abortion services. i don't think there is room in our party for a candidate who does not support a woman's full reproductive freedoms. cheers and applause] kirsten gillibrand: the day for dismissing paid leave or universal pre-k or equal pay for equal work is just a woman's issue, those days are long gone. when america's families succeed, we all succeed, that is why i will pass my family bill of rights within the first 100 days of being president. just imagine what we could achieve with a working mother in the white house instead of a misogynist. [cheers and applause] kirsten gillibrand: imagine the progress we could make with a diverse cabinet of americans who actually reflect why we are a great country and the agenda we could pass, not only with women at the table, but with a woman at the head of the table. [cheers and applause] kirsten gillibrand: now is not the time to settle for the s

the 1st of many things which seem to be in quite contradiction to the case roe v wade which is been decided by the supreme court i believe it's extremely unfair and on precedented that there are going to try to charge her for manslaughter for the loss of her child in an altercation it has not been heard before and it seems as if the state of alabama is trying to test new waters i don't think the outrage is going to have the state of alabama to reconsider those absolutely not i think in fact the outrage is what they're looking for water to in my opinion to see this case possibly overturn roe v wade so i think they're counting on the outrage i think there's a from a i'll be back with more news after the hour stay with us this is our international . when the whole may just manufacture consent to stick to the public well. when the ruling classes protect themselves. with the final merry go round listen to the one percent. to ignore middle of the room 6. 1000000 real news. my 7 years doing drugs my nephews was still in drugs my system just with doing drugs it was like an epidemic of drug abuse am

to see this case possibly overturn roe v wade so i think they're counting on the outrage.iran has agreed not to violate the rules of the 2050 nuclear deal that followed talks with representatives of the e.u. in vienna. because i don't want to give any medium term for cars as there are lots of factors influencing the situation but at least for now the task of preserving the iran nuclear deal and solving the most acute issues surrounding it has been achieved we must create protections for around from the negative effects of us sanctions which are continuing to prove harmful. challenges to the integrity of the nuclear deal stem from america's destructive policies which have isolated it from the global community. iran and the e.u. countries agreed on the implementation of special mechanisms which allow iran to trade crude oil with europe while iran will reserve the right to increase its enriched uranium if other parties do violate the 2015 deal and the u.s. unlike the e.u. continues to impose sanctions on tehran our europe correspondent peter all of us been following developme

the 1st of many things which seem to be quite contradiction to the case roe v wade which is been decided by the supreme court i believe it's extremely unfair and unprecedented that they're going to try to charge her for manslaughter for the loss of her child in an altercation has not been heard before and it seems as if the state of alabama is trying to test new orders i don't think the outrage is going to have the state of alabama to reconsider those absolutely not i think in fact the outrage is what they're looking for to in my opinion to see this case possibly overturn roe v wade so i think they're counting on the outrage. iran has agreed not to violate the rules of the 2050 nuclear deal following talks with representatives of the e.u. in vienna. because i don't want to give any medium term for cars just as there are lots of factors influencing the situation but at least for now the task of preserving the iran nuclear deal and solving the most acute issues surrounding it has been achieved we must create protections for from the negative effects of us sanctions which are continuing to

the 1st of many things which seem to be quite contradiction to the case roe v wade which is been decidedby the supreme court i believe it's extremely unfair and on precedented that there are going to try to charge her for manslaughter for the loss of her child in an altercation has not been heard before and it seems as if the state of alabama is trying to test new waters i don't think the outrage is going to have the state of alabama to reconsider those absolutely not i think in fact the outrage is what they're looking for to in my opinion to see this case possibly overturn roe v wade so i think they're counting on the outrage. still we look into a standoff between italy and the rescue ship in the mediterranean sea with dozens of migrants on board the details more besides after this. we're going to st petersburg international economic forum and the topic of our panel is are we witnessing a paradigm shift in the global economic order the answer of course is yes it's a matter of degree. globalization period that we had is that they'll be a new globalization period there will be a network d

the 1st of many things which seem to be quite contradiction to the case roe v wade which is being decidedby the supreme court i believe it's extremely unfair an unprecedented that there are going to try to charge her for manslaughter for the loss of her child in an altercation has not been heard before and it seems as if the state of alabama is trying to test new waters i don't think the outrage is going to have the state of alabama to reconsider those absolutely not i think it is the outrage is what they're looking for water to in my opinion to see this case possibly overturn roe v wade so i think they're counting on the outrage. still ahead the un's expert on torture slams the media for refusing to publish an article. on the case of wiki leaks founder julian assange. you know world's big partners through the muck and conspiracy it's time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door on the bad and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the m

see this case possibly overturn roe v wade so i think they're counting on the outrage here that some of the stories for another but next rush is finance minister has been speaking to r.t. talking sanctions on how he sees the globalization dream looking more distant than ever his words that is next on sophie and co. eat eat eat eat eat. eat eat eat. eat you'll notice the play of. the. work in the st petersburg international economic forum and the topic of our panel is are we witnessing a paradigm shift in the global economic order the answer of course is yes it's a matter of degree. my 7 years doing drugs my nephews was still in drugs my sister just with doing drugs it was like an epidemic of drug abuse america's public enemy number one in the united states is drug abuse we started going after the users in the prison population sewer we started treating sick people people who are addicted to these drugs like criminals while i was on the hill i increasingly became convinced that the war on drugs was on the state there are countless numbers of people who are in prison for. a long senten

see this case possibly overturn roe v wade so i think they're counting on the outrage. you opinion is is expected to decide today whether it will keep the to the hard brokered 2015 everything in nuclear deal united states pulled out of the accord last year and reintroduced sanctions on tehran iran is now warning it will surpass the agreed limit of its uranium enrichment strain to our europe correspondent the feed to all of the pizza is the deal or is there a chance that the e.u. will save it. well the iranian side is saying this is the last chance saloon for the 2015 over a new nuclear deal to quote a front seat last chance saloon this meeting is taking place in the public school. hotel here in vienna. what we understand and what iran is threatening really is. in the next few days unless there is any. changes in the current status quo they expect to exceed the limits of enriched uranium that they were allowed to produce on the 2015 nuclear deal now we understand that should they go over that limit its pretty much curtains for the whole nuclear deal we expected to fall a