act compared to the original bill that some way was watered down and some say it was made more roeasoreasonable. how close had you are you -- how close are you following that? >> guest: i am proud to be a member of the chair. the things you mentioned changed in the bill, i welcome. that is a result of building concensus which you have to do to get something through. no one gets hundred percent in these things and they do i question it. strong bipartisan effort addresses a huge issues issue in terms of patton controls. if companies are actually innovating $29 billion and increased overing -- over -- a handful 14% -- something is wrong. i think we did a good job with the bill in the house. now the senate will take it up. they will scrutinize it as often is the case. that is our system. but i do think this must be addressed. this really calls out for a remedy in this area. >> you have a federal it procurement bill. it seems like a lot of talk happened after the health care website problems. do you think that provides enough to get this bill off the ground? >> guest: i think one think that is impor