. >> and in the next room to me is seth rogan. >> jimmy: i love seth rogan. >> i've never met seth rogan >> jimmy: an impression of seth rogan hearing him through a wall. [ imitating seth rogan ] [ grunting ] [ laughter ] [ grunting ] [ laughter ] >> jimmy: that's what i'm talking about. that's an impression you'll hear every day. >> don't do this at home. >> jimmy: you don't hear that every day. ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha. oh, my gosh. let's talk about your movie. christmas day. >> i am so excited. >> jimmy: "parental guidance." it's you and bette midler. >> you know, you work with a giant like that, it was the greatest. we had the greatest time. marisa tomei. >> jimmy: oh, i love her too. >> three great kids. we play grandparents having babysit for our kids while marisa tries to go away. >> jimmy: it's kind of based on a true story. you had to babysit -- >> my grandkids, yeah. >> jimmy: yeah, it's unbelievably funny. >> it's a good movie. >> jimmy: it's a good movie, yup. i do love it. we have a clip of this. >> i play a minor league baseball announcer -- >> jimmy: okay. >> -- who is a little o

who has more, joe biden or joe rogan? >> joe rogan! >> well, there we go. joe rogan has twice as many followers as the vice president of the united states. who has more, ryan seacrest or ryan gosling? seacrest wins handily. he has 8.7 million. but ryan gosling has far smokier eyes, in my opinion. who has more, al roker or al jazeera? al jazeera does have more followers than al roker. who has more, dr. oz or dr. dre? dr. oz wins here. two and a half million for dr. oz. all right, who has more, larry king or queen latifah? this is royalty we're talking about. this goes to -- well, let's see. queen latifah four million. one more. who has more followers, pit bull or michael vick? [ laughter ] well, pit bull has 8.4 million. michael vick 1.7. so the dog wins. congratulations. around 2/3 of the country are suffering from freezing cold temperatures right now. scientists say it's due to a strange phenomenon called january. [ laughter ] new england and wisconsin got down to zero degrees today. in minnesota, it's negative 40 tonight. i have a pretty simple rule about

they extend the ab18 program for the alternative fuel rogan purposes and extend the carl moyer program. i have learned from staff that there is carl moyer funding from the local district potentially available. we had indicated in working with staff, there is some uncertainty about the actual language in the bill so i want to check it out. we listed it as a wash. i recommend that you consider moving from a watch to a support position. so you understand the nuance, last year's bills and these two bills in addition to extending ab 18 and carl moyer - the oil industry would be the beneficiary of the clean fuel program, and mandate on them to install hydrogen fueling stations in exchange for their support of this effort. it was agreed that that regulatory scheme would defer for 10 years and out of the new 118 funding some of the money would be available for hydrogen installation. it is one of those grand schemes in the capital. we are all interested for various pieces of it. one of the early builds to get the legislature. the next two bills that would like to draw your attention to, the nex

protect the minority against the majority of the money already he was talking about are people like rogan who meet people because there are extremists and generally that's what the person is there for them protect you and me we wouldn't do such a thing so let me ask you what the next step in his trial process is where we go from here we're looking to follow a motion to make sure he can travel into the city before february if he can and then that we're moving forward and then there will be a trial on the merits of this case and basically whether or not what he did was really free speech in terms of the court or disrupt the balance to that i mean as i look at the game the law that he was charged under in the house of representatives gallery they were already out of session the law applies to congress in session so . again i'm worried i mean i've been in this area for forty years for plotting for free speech and i don't like the bans not a good idea or free speech. now robin says the most the time when he is arrested he gets usually he gets off with either no charges are really just a slap o

josh rogan at foreign policy first breaking the news on the nomination and noting in the same breathpublican senators that are against the nomination. john cornyn saying he can't support chuck hagel because he has a, quote, problem with israel. senator dan coates said chuck hagel has had so much disrespect for the military which is a pretty rich thing to say about a veteran. he would lack experience he would need for the job. senator mccain says his colleague barely even counts as a republican. senator mark kirk says he is, quote, concerned about mr. hagel. mr. hagel also faces opposition from the democratic side for the time back in 1998 when he opposed an ambassador nominee for being what mr. hagel described at the time openly aggressively guy, for which he finally apologized last month. there is also opposition to a lesser extent just because chuck haguele is a republican. this is not ideological opposition. it's partisan. but in the technical sense of that. why is it that democratic presidents always appoint republicans to run the pentagon, but republican presidents never appoint

josh rogan at foreign policy first breaking the news on the nomination and noting in the same breath all the republican senators that are against the nomination. john cornyn saying he can't support chuck hagel because he has a, quote, problem with israel. senator dan coates said chuck hagel has had so much disrespect for the military which is a pretty rich thing to say about a veteran. he would lack experience he would need for the job. senator mccain says his colleague barely even counts as a republican. senator mark kirk says he is, quote, concerned about mr. hagel. mr. hagel also faces opposition from the democratic side for the time back in 1998 when he opposed an ambassador nominee for being what mr. hagel described at the time openly aggressively guy, for which he finally apologized last month. there is also opposition to a lesser extent just because chuck hagel is a republican. this is not ideological opposition. it's partisan. but in the technical sense of that. why is it that democratic presidents always appoint republicans to run the pentagon, but republican presidents neve

josh rogan at foreign policy first breaking the news on the nomination and noting in the same breath republican senators that are against the nomination. john cornyn saying he can't support chuck hagel because he has a, quote, problem with israel. senator dan coates said chuck hagel has had so much disrespect for the military which is a pretty rich thing to say about a veteran. he would lack experience he would need for the job. senator mccain says his colleague barely even counts as a republican. senator mark kirk says he is, quote, concerned about mr. hagel. mr. hagel also faces opposition from the democratic side for the time back in 1998 when he opposed an ambassador nominee for being what mr. hagel described at the time openly aggressively gay, for which he finally apologized last month. there is also opposition to a lesser extent just because chuck hagel is a republican. this is not ideological opposition. it's partisan. but in the technical sense of that. why is it that democratic presidents always appoint republicans to run the pentagon, but republican presidents never appoin

our friend josh rogan at foreign policy tonight reporting that someone inside the obama administration or she has seen a cable that if the information in that cable is true would be a very scary thing. the headline, as you can see there, "chemical weapons used in syria." chemical weapons used. nobody is known to have used chemical weapons in 25 years. we know syria has them. but have they used them in their civil war? because that really would change everything. but look back at that headline again. the part before the part that would change everything is crucial. "secret state department cable says chemical weapons used in syria." and can we see this secret state department cable that says this incredibly inflammatory thing? no, of course not. it's secret. and it's an unnamed obama administration official that claims to have seen the cable. and it's an unknown case that this rubicon has been crossed, insisting that the u.s. must react, that syria is testing our resolve. that when the president said any use of chemical weapons would be a red line, well, then this incident means he must

many arguments made now were also made to the qualification of women in the us astronaut rogan -- rogan, which does not exist in the manned forms now, but certainly existed up until 2010, and people like sally ride and others did all of the jobs that men could do. i think these arguments are always made with groups that are included in combat including african-americans and ldg key people, so i think it is time for people to get used to being involved in combat. guest: thank you. i appreciate your call. that is a fantastic point. women are sitting in roles that sometime ago people did not think we would belong in. the astronaut example is a perfect example. you mentioned that i served on the veterans committee, but i here for presenting my own views and opinions. host: find. frank, new jersey, also retired military. tell us briefly about your military experience. caller: i was in vietnam, and we would go out on two-week-tio- month missions and i was wondering how ms. williams thought women could handle missions climbing mountains carrying 60 pounds and for canteens of water during we we

josh rogan, let's begin with the nomination of chuck hagel. " -- guest: they traveled to iraq together when president obama was just candidate barack obama. they have a similar world via. he has been serving as the -- on the intelligence advisory board code-share. they get along. he is likely to implement his policies. he has a great personal relationship with him. host: what about the confirmation process for the forming the senator -- for the former senator? there has been a vote count out there the right now there are senators that oppose him. guest: i would not trust any vote count. most senators lamont's commit before they have had a chance to properly is that the nomination. what we do know is there are about five senators who promised to vote no on his nomination. they are republicans, which is ironic because when he was in the senate he was a republican, but the party has moved away from the centrist approach to foreign policy. there is discussion whether that would be enough to scuttle his nomination. they are prepared to put a lot of political capital behind his nomination. u