admiral rogers: yes, ma'am. he asked for a consolidated single input from the i.c., did the russians attempt to interfere in the election process? senator collins: can you explain the request between president obama for that nclassified assessment and the allegations that president trump requested that you publicly report on whether or not there was any intelligence concerning collusion between the russians and the members of the trump campaign, president trump's campaign? admiral rogers: so i apologize. i guess i am confused by the question. i will not comment on any interactions with the president. i just don't feel that is appropriate. as i previously testified, i stand by that report. let me ask a s: broader question that i truly am trying to get a handle on. and that is how does the intelligence community reach le decision on whether or not to comply with the request that comes from the president of the united states. obviously you report to the president of the united states, and i'm interested in what pro

roger: yeah.ou get cut. roger: or you get screamed at, you know. lemonis: when he's here. roger: when he's here. lemonis: is that a big issue for some of the employees, honestly? roger: we actually quite like it when he's not here, to be perfectly honest. lemonis: you do? roger: yeah. 'cause howie can come in and say, "i don't want that there," you know, "get rid of it." lemonis: you do it and you spend all day on it, and the you turn around and it's... roger: that is so soul-destroying. ♪ lemonis: could you grab all of your financial data? and i'd like to sit down and go over it all with you. howard: okay. all right. lemonis: all right? you want to go ahead and grab it? howard: yeah, yeah. lemonis: all right, great. ♪ let's start with the profit and loss statement. howard: so january through december 2015. lemonis: total revenue -- $3,136,00. the cost of goods is $1,381,000. gross profit -- $1,755,000. total expenses -- $1,876,000. leaving you with a loss of $121,000 last year. the two single big

this question probably to you, admiral rogers. if our partners globally used 702 intelligence to stop a terrorist attack? >> yes, sir, if we were to lose the 702 authority, i would fully expect leaders from some of our close yet allies to put out one loud scream. >> and in most cases, didn't they take credit for our intelligence? >> we don't, this he don't publicly talk about where it comes from. we acknowledge nsa is a primary provider of insights. >> i just wanted to get on the record. this is a global asset. >> yes. >> that the war on terror has is 702. >> yes, sir. >> mr. chairman, if i could just take the time you were trying to protect from me for my next appointment to just say following and i just want to repeat, following my interaction with my contemporaries in a number of european countries, they are deeply deeply grateful to us for the information derived from 702 has saved what they said literally hundreds of lives. >> well, certainly the committee is privy to those instances in a lot of cases and we're grateful for t

roger stone is a fascinating character. you profiled him for "the new yorker."e sort of thrives in a murkiness between fact and fiction. >> you know, that's exactly right, anderson. he is an unusual figure in that in my experience he embellishes the bad things he's done. tries to make himself look worse rather than better which is different from how most people i've interviewed over the years. >> there's a quote from donald trump back in 2008 in your new yorker profile of stone and trump at the time said roger is a sewn cold loser. but then obviously roger stone was involved for a time in donald trump's campaign and they seem -- i don't know what the relationship is now. >> well, i think that's indicative of the very much up and down relationship that rump and stone have had over the years. roger was involved in the 80s trying to get trump to run for president, and each cycle has encouraged trump to do that. once trump actually did run for president roger was really sort of a peripheral figure in the trump campaign. he never had an official position. he was very

in a phone call with mike rogers he asked that mike rogers come out and say there's no evidence so far of collusion between the campaign and russia, but also during that conversation he expressed skepticism over the intelligence community assessment that russia intervened in the 2016 election. >> i assume if he had a basis why he doesn't believe it, it would have been reported by you. do your sources not say, did the president have a rationale why he questioned the intelligence committee on this? >> from what we understand, limited information on this, that he was sort of asking to be walked through again why it is that the intelligence community unanimously is so sure about the conclusion they came to that russia did play a role in intervening in last year's election, and that in addition to that he was trying to convince admiral rogers to come out and say publicly that there was no evidence at the present time of collusion between his campaign and russia, something he pressed with jim comey as well. >> all right. so we have jim comey meets with the president first time, decides to do

roger was very much on the outs.ly clear to me how much roger really was involved with trump and how much he was simply claiming to be part of the inner circle of the campaign. >> he said he wanted to testify in public. just from a journalistic standpoint it would have been fascinating to see him testify because, you know, to actually see him under oath and have what he says under oath compared to things he had said publicly or on twitter. >> that's right. but that is characteristic of roger's bravado that he would want to testify in public. and even though he brags about his nefarious deeds, one thing he's he been very clear on is that he was not involved in any sort of connection to the russians. that's what he said. i mean, obviously that's an area that's being investigated. and the real question that i think the committee is going to want to answer is how did he apparently have advanced knowledge of the wikileaks disclosures about the democrats and john podesta if he didn't have some sort of contact with wikileak

g director rogers and director coats. i'm answering for director mccabe and myself. >> are you confident that the fbi is fully cooperating with special counsel for any requests in communication and setting you want coordination between officers for documents, work products, insights, anything the special counsel as they're trying to get organized and get prepared for the investigation as they're taking on, is everyone in the fbi fully cooperating with special counsel? >> absolutely, sir. i'm absolutely confident of that. we have a robust relationship with the special counsel's office. we're supporting them with personnel and resources in any way they request. >> thank you. admiral rogers, this spring nsa decided to stop doing about queries. that was a long conversation that's happened there. it's now come out in the public about that conversation, that that was identified as a problem. the court agreed with that. and that has been stopped. what i need to ask you is, who first identified that as a problem? >> the national

admiral rogers, is that your position? >> could you repeat? i apologize. >> the administration supports a spell without condition. on a scale of 1-10, how enthusiastic would you be if this bill passed? >> i would be ecstatic. >> my level is about 100. >> i'm not familiar with the rating system. i do think it's very important. >> i met 11. >> director coats, you had an exchange about the persons who may be subject to incidental collection, this is when you have a lawful section 702 order, but someone does communicate with american citizens. as my understanding that would be virtually impossible to do so in a way that wouldn't further infringe on the rights of american citizens, citizens, is that correct? >> yes, and that's one of the central reasons why i came to the conclusion. the main reason i came to the conclusion is it is not conceivably possible. we can go through the procedures, we can shift hundreds of people to go over and breach the rights of hundreds if not thousands of american citizens to determine whether or not they are american

gentlemen, director coats and admiral rogers, i think you testified, admiral rogers that you does discuss today's testimony with someone in the white house? >> i said i asked did the white house intend to evoke executive privileges associated with any interactions between myself and the president of the united states? >> and what was the answer to the question? >> to be honest i didn't get a definitive answer and both myself and the dni are still talking. >> why are you not answering these questions? is there an invocation by the president of the united states of executive privilege? is there or not? >> not that i'm aware of? >> why are you not -- >> because i feel it's inappropriate. >> what you feel isn't relevant, admiral. what you feel is -- why are you not answering the questions? is it an invocation of executive privilege. if there is, then let's know about it. if there isn't, answer the questions. >> i stand by the comments i've made. i'm not interested in repeating myself sir, and i don't mean that in a contentious way. >> well, i do mean it in a contentious way. i don't understan

it was admiral mike rogers, the head of the national security agency. he was apparently spotted at trump tower less than a week and half after the election. what was very strange about that, mike rogers head of the nsa, he took personal leave from work, he took a personal day to leave washington, d.c. where he worked running the nsa to travel to new york presumably on his own dime, to go visit the candidate the president-elect at trump tower? incidentally, mike rogers, as an admiral in the navy and head of the nsa he's in the military chain of command he answers to the commander in chief at that time was barack obama. apparently mike rogers did not even tell president obama or the obama administration generally he was doing this, he was taking a personal day to leave d.c., g to new york to visit the president-elect. it was the "wall street journal" first to report on nsa head, mike rogers, playing hooky that day. they were also first to report on why he might have done it, the prospect the president-elect might give mike rogers a big promotion, he might

admiral rogers? >> not that i'm aware of. >> director mccabe? >> no, sir. >> admiral rogers this is to you. if fisa 702 statutory authorities were to end or even be diminished, what would be the impact on our national security? >> i could not generate the same level of insight that our nation, our friends and allies around the world count on with respect to counterterrorism, counterproliferation. i could not for example be able to re-create the insights on the russian effort to influence the 2016 election cycle. without 702 we could not have produced that level of insight. >> this is a jump ball. april 26, 2017, the foreign intelligence surveillance court commonly known as fisk felt that section 702 certifications including targeting and minimization procedures are lawful both under fisa statute and the 4th amendment. as former director comey testified last month, the only reason our laws even require the certification to cover, and i quote, these non-americans who aren't in our country, is because t

>> no, sir. >> admiral rogers, this is to you. fisa 702 statutory authorities were to end or even be diminished, what would be the impact on our national security? >> i couldn't generate the same level of insight that the nation, friends and allies around the world count on with respect to counterterrorism, counter proliferation. i could not be able to re-create the insights on the russian efforts to influence the 2016eli election cycle.on without seven t two we could not have produced that level of insight. >> this is a jump ball. april 26, 2017 before intelligence court held section 72 -- including sargon and minimization procedures are lawful both under fisa statute and the fourth amendment. as former director comey testified last month the only reason our laws even required t for certification to cover and the quote these non-americans ns who are not in our country, is because their communications transiting u.s.-based networkss and systems. yet others have suggested imposing a fourth amendment warrant requirement on foreigner

roger: they could have tried to. they could have helped. charlie: let me read what roger wrote.] roger: this is always a delicate moment. [laughter] charlie: i just like corbyn's anti-americanism, his long flirtation with hamas, his left over marxism and anti-zionism, his nato bashing, his unworkable tax and spend promises. he is of that awful cold world left that believes soviet moscow was probably not as bad as washington. roger: and i concluded that column by saying he was the better alternative. elections in place in the real world. that was an agonizing choice for me because a lot of what corbyn has done and what a lot of the people around him -- their attitudes toward israel, their flirtation with hamas -- troubles me deeply. i do not like it. i do not like it at all. but i really felt that theresa may and what the conservative party had done in this british exit from the european union, their responsibility to that, the campaign she had run. the fact that young people were behind corbin and power would temper the extremes, at least i hope so, i felt that he was marginally

admiral rogers, this is to you. there's much reports in the news, much of it inaccurate, that characterizes 702 as a means of targeting u.s. persons. we know that targeting u.s. persons is prohibited. is it -- as is, what is termed reverse targeting. can you clarify the reverse targeting prohibition and what does it prevent the ic from targeting and collecting? >> so reverse targeting is designed to preclude our ability to bypass the law and what do i mean by that? the law is expressly designed to ensure that we are not using this legal framework as a capability to target u.s. persons. reverse targeting is the following scenario. say we're interested in generating insight on u.s. person a. we know that we can't get a title one. we can't get a fisa warrant, so under the idea of reverse target the theory would be well, why not target a foreign entity that that u.s. person talks to and then you'll get the insights you want on the u.s. person, but you'll have bypassed the court process and you'll have bypassed the entir

gentlemen, director coats and admiral rogers, i think you testified, admiral rogers, you did discuss today's testimony with someone in the white house. >> i said i asked what did the white house intend to evoke, executive privileges between interactions with myself and the united states. >> what is the answer? >> i didn't get a definitive answer. both myself and the dni are still talking. >> i'll ask both of you the same question. why are not not answering these questions? is there an invocation by the president of the united states of executive privilege? is there or not? >> not that i'm aware of. >> why are you not answering the questions? >> i feel it is inappropriate. >> what you feel isn't relevant, admiral. what you feel isn't the answer. >> i stand accountable. >> why are you not answering the questions? is it an invocation of executive privilege? if there is, let's know about it. if there isn't, answer the questions. >> i stand by the comments i've made. i'm not interested in repeating myself, sir. i don't mean that in a contentious way. >> i do mean it in a contentious way.

watch. >> have you talked about this issue with admiral rogers? >> that is something that i -- i would like to withhold that question at this particular point in time. >> not a term of art. i would like to withhold that question. that's not a thing. dan coats said he would like to withhold on that. pause. we all got pregnant watching that pause that was so long. that happened back on may 23rd. no answer. extremely long, pregnant pause. did you guys discuss this matter together? don't want to talk about it. but now, we're passed that point in time, and tonight this late-breaking news from "the washington post" is that the director of national intelligence, dan coats, told his associates not only that the president asked he and admiral mike rogers to pour public cold water on the investigation. not only that he asked them to put -- not only that he asked them to put public cold water on the investigation, but that he, quote, asked director of national intelligence dan coats if he personally, if coats, would intervene with the fbi director to get the

house majority whip, steve scalise, texas congressman roger williams, both been shot. three others apparently shot as well on a baseball fields outside of our nation's capitol. we are told that scalise took bullet to the hip. he's been a lift today nearby hospital. his condition according to the associated press is listed as stable. early reports are that he will survive, in fact, the president suggesting the same thing just a moment ago from the white house. so, we have a quickly developing story, as we say good morning here on america's news room. and here we go, into yet another significant development in washington dc. >> okay, there with bill help err. >> learned a lot of information in the past couple every minutes. most recently, texas congressman roger williams was also shot in addition to representative steve scalise. >> we heard four people had been shot. but no the capitol police and the alexandria police department confirm five people have been shot, taken to area hospital. five people have been taken to the hospital. but yes, just in the process, looks lik

my questions are geared toward director coats and admiral rogers. you have testified that you never felt any pressure to influence any ongoing investigation of the fbi. are you prepared to say that you have never felt or been asked by the president or the white house to influence an ongoing investigation? >> senator , i hate to give up reading this, but i'm going to do it. i'm willing to come before the committee and tell you what i know and what i don't know. when i'm not willing to do is share what i think is confidential information that ought to be protected in an open hearing. i'm not prepared to answer your question today. >> director coats, what the incredible respect i have for you, i'm not asking for classified information. i'm asking whether or not you've ever been asked by anyone to influence an ongoing investigation? >> understand, but i'm not going down that road. not in a public forum. i also was asked the question, if the special prosecutor called upon me to meet with him and asked his questions, i said i'll be willing to do that. >>

roger: gillian: there is a lot of ideal of -- roger: there is a lot of idealism.ocialism, you may find that strange, but you have to respect the idealism of the young people. when you think that all these old people with 10 years to live on the actuarial tables, voted britain out of the european union, and thereby condemned people with 70 years to live to accept a britain that they do not want, i think that was terrible. they could have tried to. they could have helped. charlie: let me read this. [laughter] roger: this is always a delicate moment. [laughter] charlie: i just like corbyn's anti-americanism, his long flirtation with hamas, his left over marxism and anti-zionism, his nato bashing, his unworkable tax and spend promises. he believes soviet moscow was probably not as bad as washington. roger: he was the better alternative. elections in place in the real world. that was an agonizing choice for me because a lot of what corbyn has done and what a lot of the people around him -- their attitudes toward israel, their flirtation with hamas -- troubles me deeply

did either dan coats or mike rogers do the same? >> reporter: the answer is yes, when it comes to rogers. he had interaction with the president and documented it in a memo written by his deputy at the nsa, richard lajet. one congressional source i spoke to seesaw the memo said it wasn't like the comey memos. one page and doesn't offer many details of the conversation, but the memo does document it and makes clear that rogers thought it was out of the ordinary. as for coats, they not document the conversation he had with the president as far as the people i've spoken to briefed by him, we're told. >> dana, stick around. a lot more to discuss. another big story happening right where you are in washington. minutes from now senate republicans will file into a closed-door briefing in his own health care bill. then we, the american people, get to find out. cnn's m.j. lee and the rest of the cnn political team have dug up the details what is inside that bill. m.j., what are we learning? >> reporter: john, the big question, we're awaiting t

trump associate roger stone has agreed to do the same next month. says to rebut podesta about whether stone knew in advance about the hacking of his e-mail. he says he'd prefer that his testimony would be in public. the goal of that investigation, the oathers a others going on, getting to the bottom of russia's interference in the election. we don't know how it's all going to end, of course, the pieces we do have make for a fascinating cnn special report. jim sciutto hosts "the russian connection: inside the attack on democracy." that's coming up next on cnn. thanks very much for watching "360." see you again tomorrow night. that special report starts right now. >>> the following is a cnn special report. >> the nation's bitter adversary. >> they're coming after america. >> dangerous and deceptive. >> a reasonably realistic e-mail. >> he meant to say illegitimate. he said it was legitimate. the rest is history. >> their weapons, insidious and unsuspecting. >> they're looking to weaponize information. >> threatening american votes and striking at the

that sounds like something karen rogers will actually do.n sea isle, i'm jeff cole, fox 29 news. >>> have like legislators and council members and whatever out there helping. okay. back to your fox 29 weather authority now. taking live look at rehoboth beach a dip in the water for most people not iain sounds like a very good idea. >> officially we're in heat wave meteorologist kathy orr has your forecast in 15 seconds. >>> in weather we're talking about record heat across the delaware valley. down the beach, looking pretty good. rehoboth beach, delaware, plenty of sunshine with temperatures in the the yeses it's 95 in philadelphia. the high today nick with a southwesterly wind. right now we're seeing somewhat cooler air in burlington, rochester, new york and toronto a back door front that will be pushing through and drying us out and cooling down those temperatures. take look at the peak heat up di cease when you add the heat and humidity. dover felt like 102. felt like 99 in northeast philadelphia. 98 in millville and reading. atlantic city

that's coming up shortly, and from mike rogers, admiral mike rogers, the head of the nsa, the nationalecurity agency. but rebecca, let me read to you another quote that jumped up at me from the comey written testimony. i felt compelled to document my first conversation with the president-elect in a member o'. to ensure accuracy i began to type it on a laptop in an fbi vehicle outside trump tower the moment i walked out of the meeting. creating written records immediately after one-on-one conversations with mr. trump was my practices from that point forward. explain why that's so important. he didn't write similar memos following his only two meetings with president obama. >> that struck out to me, wolf, for the same reason. first of all, because this was so unusual for james comey. it was not his standard operating procedure until he start meeting with donald trump. that will suggests that he thought there was something unusual, perhaps something untoward going on. he wanted to make sure that he had his side of the story in writing just in case perhaps with came into a situation like t

rogers: hello, deputy chief fred rogers. we did put a statement out today and the chief wants to commend special agent krystal griner, david bailey for their heroic and appropriate response to protecting members today. he's grateful for special agent griner who is in good condition at the hospital, having been shot in the ankle. and special agent baileys was treated and released, having sustained a minor injury during the incident. united states capitol police is dedicated to the mission of protecting the united states capitol, members of congress and staff and the visiting public. and today we saw how our officers' extensive training was put into action. we also would like to thank our partner agencies, the f.b.i., a.t.f., u.s. park police, virginia state police, and especially the alexandria police for their work in helping us to respond and mitigate this incident. we continue to provide a robust and visible presence at the capitol complex and to monitor national and world events to provide a level of security that's appro

we have to talk to general flynn, carter page, roger stone.ames that have been mentioned, many of which we've had to subpoena documents from, that we want to get their answers so we can bring them in and talk to the committee, as well. >> your colleague, senator jim resh, suggested the investigation by bob mueller is tainted because three members of his legal team have given political donations to democrats. >> i guess you've got to wait and see when the thing is over. >> but why -- >> if they do something, it's tainted, it's tainted by all that. i mean, i had a very difficult time, from what i know, from the intelligence committee, i would have real trouble with it. >> is mueller's investigation tainted? >> respectfully, i disagree with senator risch. we even had the attorney general in open testimony, i asked him, you know, what he thought about bob mueller. he said he was a man of great integrity. this is a guy that was uniformly given accolades by everyone when he was first named. i think he's going about this in a thorough way, and we oug

matt, roger stone says stuff. that's what roger stone does. he throws stones, no pun intended here. you know who listens to roger stone? the president of the united states. not insignificant here. >> it's not. i think if he moved to fire rosenstein or fire mueller, it's not going to help him. the next person is the same problem he has now. this isn't going to shut down the investigation. stone may enjoy giving that advice. >> we should point out roger stone is wanted to come in to talk to the senate investigators, house investigators and may be involved in mueller's counter intelligence investigation. he is not disconnected. >> no. people have to understand that there are two parallel tracks in this special counsel investigation. you have the broad counterintelligence investigation. the idea is to see another country, figure out the espionage and counter it. then you have the criminal part, which would be at this point we know of michael flynn and paul manafort. we don't have any information that stone or kushner in is part of that. >> this writing that the president is doing on twi

when he does the public tweeting or privately talking to coats and rogers. he thinks he's not getting enough coverage. the russia investigation is a real story. he is channelling this understandable frustration that comey and others were telling him that he's not under investigation and wants it made clear to the public. he's doing it in an inappropriate way. if not criminal, unethical. it's likely not criminal, but unethical. he trips himself up. the other part of cnn reporting about this that struck me so trump is coats and rogers asked the white house about it and whether he wanted to exert it. he couldn't answer back to them. again, feel free to exert it to give a clear answer in front of that committee and made for an awkward news cycle. in many ways, he is tripping himself up. >> it did make for an awkward cycle. i said by not answering, it kept them from saying out loud what we know to be true, the president asked them to say there was no collusion. who knows if they meant to do it or not. one of the mysteries of the white house. mary kathryn, i apolo

this is rogers and coats.me play their answers for you. >> i'm not prepared to answer your question today. >> i'm not going to discuss the specifics of conversations with the president of the united states. >> now with this reporting, david, it becomes much more interesting, their refusal to answer the question. >> it does, erin. it was particularly interesting at the time because if you lined it up with what james comey said just days before, what did comey tell you? first he described his conversation with the president. he said he turned the originals of his notes over to the special counsel, bob mueller. then when asked whether he believed that this constituted obstruction of justice he said bob muller's going to have to decide that. he pretty wet signalled where this was going. then you saw muller begin to hire people who were specialists in obstruction of justice. then you move on to what you showed the clip of. we have the oddity which we all focused in on at the time. he had two officials who were refu

admiral rogers? >> likewise, i certainly hope so. >> mr. rosenstein, would you? >> senator, speaking for mr. mccabe and myself, we have been involved in managing the criminal investigation, and so i would ask that as chairman burr suggested, it's appropriate for director mueller, since we turned over control of the investigation for him to make determination about what we can and can't speak about, so i would encourage you to use mr. mueller as your point person. >> let's just say the questions asked to mr. mccabe weren't anything on the investigation side. could you answer differently in a classified setting, sir? >> i would reiterate the comments. at this point with the special counsel involved, it would be appropriate for the committee to have an understanding with the special counsel's office as to where those questions would go, but i would also point out that as we have historically when we are investigating sensitive matters in which operational security is of utmost importance, members of the

we know roger stone going to testify next month.however, it will not be public, as he had originally wanted. it will be private. what are perhaps some of the factors that went into making this private rather than public? >> i think the biggest factor is that roger stone is known for showmanship, shall we say, in terms of public displays. and i think there was a concern by the committee that it would become something of a show, that he would make statements that might be far afield, that it would not be relevant. they thought this would be a more containable hearing. it's not dissimilar to what we saw for john podesta. we have seen other people in things related to this investigation testify in public, but this is different. i do think it was interesting. stone's statement we read before was he was eager to talk to them, eager to testify and to talk about collusion which he believes doesn't exist and that i believe, caveat, is something i have not heard him say before. >> gives some wiggle room. >> not really for himself but about ot

angeles, i am tavis smiley, tonight our first conversation with roger corman, the director responsible for more than 400 f films during his long career. he joins us to discuss his sa tief tire of the films and keb moe talks to us. we are glad you join us, all of that in just a moment. ♪ and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. ♪ please welcome our legendary film producer roger corman back to this program. his latest release was "death rate" which is on netflix and dvd. a trailer from "death rate" 2050. my fellow citizens of this great country of ours. the united corporations of america. welcome to that death race. what about frankinstein. >> i see frankinstein will be extinct tomorrow. ♪ >> by the way, just for the record my hair -- >> the leader there, the chairman, the president does have a sort of an interesting hair hairdo. were you trying to make a particular statement mr. corman? >> they were sort of an inside joke. we shot the picture earlier in the primaries, we had no idea f that trump would be president. we thought it was a little joke and we

i have a sense with roger stone, nothing will stay behind closed doors. >> one thing that set roger stone apart in the congressional and special council investigations, at every opportunity stone has said he wants to tell his story, not shying away from cameras or the press, wants to testify publicly. we don't know yet if any laws were broken or what he new or didn't know about the investigation and they will try to find it out behind closed doors. >>> a little bit odd this morning, time mask is asking for multiple trump golf courses, what are essentially fake "time" magazines with the president on it. you saw this and tweeted one word. why? >> when my kids were little they were holding the baseball bat and you get them back, you would order a magazine coverage. say you had a .500 average and you're the biggest hitter in baseball history, to me, when i saw that, that was sort of the equivalent of that, right? it's silly, that it was done, but nonetheless, this guy is a marketer, this is what he does, i'm not surprised. it's silly that such a big deal was made about it. >> i think david sa

roger, stay with us. we do want to mention one other story, it's a wave of cyber attacks around the world today the world's largest advertising agency, wpp, ukrainian government agencies are among those hit. we're watching a global story today. >> that's right, carl. looks like the cyber attacks report sod far stretch from britain to russia. they call the attacks unprecedented but saying they're able to handle it in the ukraine. let me give you a list of companies and entities that have reported the cyber attack so far. that includes ukrainian government agencies, kiev airport, british advertising agency wpp, the danish shipping company maersk, and a russian oil company reporting sib area tacks this morning the national bank of ukraine out with a statement this morning, they say, "as a result of the cyber attacks, banks experienced difficulty in services customers and performing banking operations all the financial market participants have taken steps to tighten security measures to counteract these hacke

rogers hurt his chaos. the two men are joining us from

while we wait for congressman roger williams to appear here at the u.s. capitol, we'll show you reaction from members of the u.s. senate earlier today. >> majority leader? >> i know the entire senate will join in echoing sentiments by the president this morning. we're deeply saddened and concerned for those injured. we'll keep them in our prayers and we'll continue to send them every wish for quick and full recovery. we're grateful for all those who step in to help, those practicing on the field, the first responders and, of course, the capitol police officers on the scene. we're deeply indebted to their service. we again salute their continuing and unfailing bravery on behalf of the capitol community. the congressional baseball game is a bipartisan charity event. i know the senate will embrace that spirit today as we come together and expressing both our concern and our gratitude. >> i join with the majority leader in offering our prayers for those who were injured. i was absolutely shaken by the news of a shooting early this morning at the baseball fiel

rogers: their particular assignment today was to protect the congressman. reporter: \[inaudible] mr. rogers: today we had capitol police officers assigned to monitor the event. reporter: there's video and audio recordings of the gun fire and the gun battle. it would appear to have been ferocious. by a lehman's count, dozens and dozens of shots fired and people screaming, get down. can you describe what was -- what your officers and what the capitol officers were facing when they came in? mr. brown: i won't go into the specifics of the investigation but i've heard the video and i've talked to some of my officers at least. or some of them. it was not only chaotic but there was -- it was a combat situation. that's something that law enforcement is trained to do. our officers are trained to do. i'm very proud of the officers at a.p.d. and the officers from the capitol police who stood their ground and did their job. more will come out of this when the facts are known and the investigation's complete. but i couldn't be more proud of the alexandria police officer

rogers had with mr. trump. during that call the president questioned the veracity of the intelligence community's judgment that russia had interfered with the election and tried to persuade mr. rogers to say there was no evidence of collusion between his campaign and russian officials. well, this morning the president responded to the latest reports with a personal attack on mueller's investigators. quote, you are witnessing the single greatest witch hunt in american political history led by some very bad and conflicted people. trump also claimed without evidence that the probe into collusion is over. they made up a phony collusion with the russian story and found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. nice. that's trump in tweet. joining me now are three national security reporters, charlie savage, adam entous and shane harris. shane, you've got the story which follows up on what we had last night, that the special counsel is looking at the president for obstruction of justic

here is the statement that roger stone gave me yesterday. i am confident that podesta most likely repeated his lie that i knew about the hacking of his e-mail and i'm anxious to rebut this falsehood. i'm unhappy my testimony will be be in public. i believe it's important to resolve the problem of russian collusion with the trulmp campaign that i believe is non-existence. the lie is the tweet that came from roger stone in august of 2016 when he said john podesta was next in the barrel. two months later, wikileaks released podesta's e-mails. some raised connections between the two. roger stone maintained it was not about john podesta's e-mails and it was in reference to his business dealings. >> it was more than that one tweet. roger stone had a lot to say throughout the election about connections to wikileaks and jew assange. thanks so much. appreciate it. >>> let's talk with someone on the committee right now, democratic congressman mike quigley. it's great to see you. >> thank you. good morning. >> did you find the meeting with john podesta

joining us from palo alto, roger mackname ceos meeting with the president yesterday. research, immigration policy, modernizing government operations here some sound from bezos >> i think it will be impossible to overstate this is that the united states needs to in every way at every level be working on machine learning and artificial intelligence and that can be used in every part of government to improve the services that government provides to citizens >> all right roger, i have to get your take on what you think was about. your read of the body language and all the optics but more importantly, what happens now as some of these conversations continue between the valley and the white house >> so i think the core thing, carl, is that the agenda of the day really looked like it was about secretary tsecretary the groundwork for privatizing a lot of government services wlchlt you think that's a good idea or bad idea, i think that government is not currently structured with a mission that privatis well. you can imagine, we had a little test trial balloon of that a couple

it reminds me of that old will rogers saying.hat feeling you get when a baby gets ahold of a hammer. it just feels really, really odd. you are not supposed to laugh at my jokes. >> it's really funny. i hadn't heard that. >> i will tell you the one thing that bothered me about it is that the adulation -- this was the first big formal cabinet meeting which is normally a substantive meeting that you would hope gets on to a more substantive conversation. but this whole -- it seemed so clumsy. adulation is a big part of american politics. you see it on the house floor. they say, mr. speaker, and my great and good friend on the other side of the aisle who i will proceed to rip their face off here in a few minutes, this has all been part of politics. what was a little odd about this today was it was -- it was clearly scripted. and it was a very clumsy way about saying, no problems here, we're doing great things. i just -- it just didn't rise to the level of a presidential appearance not only for the cabinet but for the president himself

admiral rogers?'m aware of. >> director mccabe. >> no, sir. >> admiral rogers, this is to you. if 702 statutory authorities were to end or be dim -- diminished. what would be- >> i could not be able to recreate the insights on the russian efforts to influence the 2016 election cycle without 702 we could not have produced that level of insight. >> this is a jump ball. april 26, 2017, the court held that section 702 certifications including the targeting and minimization procedures are lawful both under fisa statute and the fourth amendment. as former director comey testified last month the only reason our laws cover the non-americans who aren't in our country is because their communications u.s. based networks and systems yet others have suggested imposing a fourth amendment warrant requirement on foreigners located outside the united states. this is really nsa and justice. would imposing such a warrant requirement impact our national security tools to protect america? >> i'll be happy to take the bal

his boss representative roger williams from texas suffered a sprained ankle during the incident. two capitol police officers on scalise's security detail were hospitalized. one shot in the ankle but in good condition and the other was released after sustaining a minor nongunshot injury. last night president trump visited the wounded officer in the hospital as well as representative scalise and his wife. the president later tweeted that scalise is in very tough shape, but he is a real fighter. pray for steve. nbc's tom costello has more now on the shooting. >> reporter: captured on cell phone video, the chilling moment that gunshots rang out in alexandria, virginia. >> shots fired and people are possibly victims involved. >> reporter: an all-out gun battle. as capitol hill police and alexandria officers engaged a lone gunman, 66-year-old james hodgkinson targeting republican members of congress who were practicing for a charity baseball game. >> we need medics. we've got a suspect shooting. we're at the baseball field -- >> among the first to be hit, republican whip steve scalise.