roger bernard says even if that amendment is pulled off the table it shows how climate issues changesre critical to farm state lawmakers. >> well, the number and scope of the amendments that lawmakers offered up for the senate consideration of that interior and environment spending bill certainly reflect what they have been hearing a lot from their constituents on and that is renewable fuels and climate change. now, the environmental protection agency is one of the keys in both of those topics. and lawmakers certainly want to use the amendment process on the spending bill to make their points on exactly what issues they want epa to address or maybe, more importantly, not to address. so how do they go about getting an agency's attention like that? well, by basically controlling the purse strings. it is not that they are telling epa they cannot do this or that. the way they go about it is by saying you can't spend any money to do a certain thing. so that's how lawmakers use the appropriations process to effect how an administration handling a given program or project. for "u.s. farm rep