. >> roger brown. >> please call items one, two, three, four together. one hearing to discuss the removal of 41 out of 55 long-term beddings from the adult residential facility. >> agenda item two is an ordinance -- excuse me. agenda item two is a resolution urging the department of public health to rescind. item three is submitting the health code to require 55 bed residential facility. four is ordinance to require department of public health to maintain and operate at full capacity 55 bed facility as soon as possible but not later than july 1, 2021. before that 41 of the 55 beds may be used as emergency shelter for people experiencing homelessness. >> i would like to turn it to supervisor ronen for remarks. >> thank you. good morning i am happy to be here to announce that we have reached a resolution to this crisis that was before us. after months of disagreement on the issue, this past friday afternoon my office, together with worker leaders from the adult residential facility, local 21 and the representatives, dph leaders and mayor's office and super

. >>> let's talk about this and what it means, ron brown and our legal analyst jennifer rogers, good morning one and all. busy week ahead. jennifer, begin with you, the letter was striking from cooper who represents bolton and kupperman. what struck me so much is he saying you are asking my client to adjudicate this constitutional dispute himself and if he does he will either inflict a great constitutional injuries, the word he chose, on either the president or the house. how crucial would this ruling be? >> it's really important because we have a lot of witnesses to come, right, people who may feel stuck in the middle and want guidance. >> just like this. >> exactly and just like john bolton potentially. it's really important. the question is going to be, is he going to take in good faith the ruling of the court that i think will be that he needs to testify pursuant to the subpoena or is he going to try to appeal and drag it out and all that in which case it will look more like he's acting at the behest of a witness and a neutral witness. >> this is the direction of a stonewalling s