roger ebert wrote one movie. that was so bad that he spent the rest of his career trying to talk the rest of us out of writing movies somehow like that's how bad the valley of the. hell you listed off when you 1st when you 1st got out to hollywood tommy muska read sid fields book because when i was young i got out into what they all i wanted that i remember thinking do i want to be a comedian i want to act i want to write i read said phil screenplay which was like . the strunk and white. of film i think those are. robert mckee story there is save the cat and then there's obviously that one and so when you wrote a screenwriting book. say the cat everybody loves save the cat and that's ok yeah that's the big one that everybody always looks out and so right screenwriting book and this tells you a lot about the world we had written and by the time the rotor screenwriting book we had written about 10 or 12 movies that got made and were in movie theaters like we're not talking esoteric series so we did a chapter in our

roger ebert wrote one movie. that was so bad that he spent the rest of his career trying to talk the rest of us out of writing movies somehow like that's how bad the valley of the. hell you listen on when you're 40 when you 1st get out to hollywood tommy muska read sid fields book because when i was young i got out into what they all i wanted that i remember thinking do i want to be a comedian don't want to act i want to write i read said fill the screenplay which was like. the strunk and white. of film i think those are. robert mckee story there is save the cat and then there's obviously that one and so when you wrote a screenwriting book. say the cat everybody loves save the cattle and that's what yeah that's the big one that everybody always looks out and so we're right in screenwriting book and this tells you a lot about the world we had written and by the down the road or screenwriting book we'd written about 10 or 12 movies that got made and were in movie theaters like we're not talking esoteric theory so w

roger ebert wrote one movie. that was so bad that he spent the rest of his career trying to talk the rest of us out of writing movies somehow like that's how bad a valuable he talked about it but i'll. tell you when your friends when you 1st get out to hollywood tommy muska read sid fields book because when i was young i got out you know what they all i wanted that i remember thinking do i want to be a comedian don't want to act i want to write i read said fill the screenplay which is like this. the strength in white. of film i think there's a. robert mckee story there is save the cat and then there's all obviously that one and so when we wrote a screenwriting book. say the cat everybody loves save the capital so that's on now that's the big one that everybody always looks out and so we're right in screenwriting book and this tells a lot about the world we had written and by the down the road or screenwriting book we'd written about 10 or 12 movies that got made and were in movie theaters like we're not talking e

so we thought and then that of course is a turns out roger ebert said it sucked and then a fox because they decided to write taxi 2 isn't hey guess what you don't have the right to actually do it but they said if you take this children's book and museum can you turn that into something and we said oh yeah mostly probably you want to know the way i look at it is like roger ebert i know he stood astride a let's say a very shallow canal in my book criticism that any time you go from critic and go to critics can go watch what they watch when you start crowd book ciro your movie socks. today i can't imagine how easy that is to live mad i'm going to get i don't want roger ebert i thought a lot of stalemate is going to be like that it is it is pretty easy although i mean here's the bummer you read sometimes you read criticism there's 2 kinds of criticism you know there's a criticism that you read there like op that's just unfound they don't get me but the scarier criticisms are your criticism really. makes some good points. you make a good points there that's a criticism that's tough to get o

roger ebert of rutgers identified a research article by the wuhan institute of virology scientists, discoverya rich gene pool of bat sars related coronavirus provides new insights into the origin of sars coronavirus, and it qualifies as a gain of function and was clearly a product of nih funding, the paper drafted by wiv scientists, clearly states that the under lying research was funded by, among other entities, the nih. own database of grantees lists the research and confirmed 660,000 was spent supporting it. perhaps we should focus more on investigating where this virus came from and if it emanated from a lab which had some funding from nih and dr. fauci rather than trying to make it more difficult for vaccines to get into the arms of american citizens. thank you, i yield back my time. >> thank you, gentle lady for yielding back. the chair now recognizes mr. raskin, for five minutes. >> here's what i don't get. on six different occasions there were inspections and audits in the spring and summer of 2020 that ended with warnings to emergent that you need to take urgent action to improve con