and should attract viewers, it is clear that we see on the screen a completely different actor or rolan bykovs befallen. eh, the filming process, but while bykov appeared, other actors who remained in the film were added to it. in the end , a wonderful character was written for yevgeny leonov. illusionist, as alexander naumovich calls him mita, that is, the person who is engaged in showing the film. well , that is, and after a bull you were changed to oleg tabakov, which you just saw on the screen. he perfectly, in principle, joined the top three actors of which the director himself was originally. yes, i saw on the screen among the performers of the main roles, and just here evgeny leonov, who played the cinematographer of an absolutely imaginary opportunist, is another such bright work in this film, but again, who are these characters? why why is this a trio of artists? yes, on the screen, who they personify, and the third artist efremov yes, of course, who does not have a single word in this film, in fact not a single retort. why because in the script they were, of course, because accordin