supreme court felt in romer vs. edwards that make a reference to this type of animus and violates the very idea of the co-production of the laws and the most basic and general form. also violates the but fundamental paradigm of the rationality in response to such an ms that lacks a rational basis. despite such legal setbacks in recent years you aren't -- the politics of disgust is alive and well as groups often put forward other arguments on the surface but when you press them and you will see this with the same sex marriage the politics of disgust alternately reveals its hand. so a closer study of disgust and the way it is used throughout history will help us to understand what is going on to understand powerful arguments against disgust in possible theory and practice by showing how bad emotion and expresses a universal discomfort with bodily reality but then uses that discovered to target and subordinate vulnerable minorities i use perot's to misogyny and the history of the role played by disgust as contamination in amer