those were rommel's words. that is a quote from rommel. he believed the battle had to be won on d-day. that was where the battle had to be won. and he believed it had to be won on the beaches. as a consequence of that, what he wants to do is put a strong defensive perimeter along the beaches. he wants to make this as strong as possible along this area. what is in rommel's thinking? rommel has been in north africa, he has fought the british, he is has fought the americans somewhat, and he is of the opinion that air power will preclude mobile forces from reaching the beaches. he believes that if they use the other approach -- remember, prerequisite for an amphibious operation is? air superiority? naval superiority around there, right? air superiority is something we win by 1944. you are able to interdict those forces. rommel believes that allied air power is so significant they will not be able to get to the beaches. if you keep the strategic reserve far to the rear, they will never make it forward. that is part of his thinking. rommel will

those were rommel's words. that is a quote from rommel. he believed the battle had to be onwon on d-day and he believed it had to be won on the beaches. aat he wants to do is put strong defensive perimeter along the beaches. he wants to make this as strong as possible along this area. what is in rommel's thinking? been in north africa, he has fought the british, he is faulty americans somewhat, and he is of the opinion that air power will preclude mobile forces from reaching the beaches. he believes that if they use the other approach -- remember, prerequisite for an amphibious operation is? air support your, -- air support eriority. rommel believes that allied air significant they will not be of the get to the beaches. so farkeep the defense to the rear, they will not make it forward. rommel will also later be implicated in the plot to tler.sinate hi how many of you have seen that movie? plan that was hatched. rommel is not of the opinion -- you've heard me say this before, for the russians, stalingrad was the most important campaign of t

what is in rommel's thinking? rommel has been in north africa, fought the british, fought the americans, somewhat thin he is of the opinion that airpower will preclude. believeseaves if -- he if they use another approach. prerequisite for amphibious invasion is naval superiority. air superiority is something that we win by 1944. you are able to interdict those forces. rommel believes that allied air power is so significant in that they will not be able to get to the beaches. rear, you near the will never make it forward. rommel will be implicated in the plot to assassinate hitler. how many have seen that movie? a scheme that was eventually hatched. --mel is not of the opinion for the russians, stalingrad is the most important campaign. for the british, normandy is the most important campaign. let's think about what rommel was thinking at this point in time. he is no longer of the opinion that germany will have a complete and total victory in world war ii. the russians have been only offense. germans have lost mill

i year later when rommell is put in charge, a lot of the forces had been moved forward. a at 10:00 on real america, monthly film series on the activities of president lyndon johnson. >> he remarked one of the chief executive's most important jobs was attracting able intelligent public servants to washington. the month of june would see two major appointments, first the secretary of commerce and thurgood marshall as associate justice of the supreme court. at 6:30 eastern, george washington university history professor discusses the cold war competition between the u.s. and china to influence new independent african and asian countries. >> during the 1960's, the rivalry intensified. this is an important point where i think to many american policymakers chinese activities in southeast asia and africa start to become as or more worrisome than soviet activities. >> at 9:00, eric buckland talks about confederate colonel john as mosby. -- s. mosby. >> a couple of times lee complained that he was fighting into many small groups. this decentralized way he operated the not make se

. >>> y tambiÉn con rommel martÍnez colaborador de hola y tambiÉn fue publ icista de marjorie de sousa para uno pelÍcula. >>> estÁn todos los dÍas en todo los noticieros siempre se habla ellos. >>> nunca la publicidad es suficiente para un articulsta Ú lo sabes. >>> doctora, quÉ es lo que hace que una persona quiera compartir su vida privada en las redes sociales y a echarse esta bomba? >>> bueno hoy en dÍa la mayoria del autoestima de una persona estÁ lico ada a cÓmo me veo y cuÁntos like tengo es un daÑo que se le hace a los niÑos una necesidad de aprobaciÓn y de reafirmaciÓn no valemos por lo que estamos sino por como vemos. >>> compartir problemas personales para que todos lo vean. >>> porque sabemos que no tenemos cercana del verdad que pueda trabajar con nosotros en ese punto creemos que nuestra comunidad somos todos esos likes que estamos viendo por eso duele uno o uno mÁs. >>> pero los ataques uno contra otros y ademÁs tienen un niÑo. >>> cuando yo lanzo el ataque estoy esperando una barra de personas que me apoyen y la otra parte hace lo mismo lo que buscamos es soporte gente

he used it, rommel also said war in the desert's like war on an ocean, keep moving or you get had. so that was iraq. so we went to afghanistan, and when you read history in afghanistan from 1823 to 1923, the british tried to civilize the place and got continuously murdered on the way out when they were leaving the place saying they were leaving the place, and then they'd come back and try it again. and then the russians tried it. so the question is, in the human condition can we learn from history in and that's your purpose in writing. and i gave you two examples that one guy did and the other, the whole united states didn't know a damn thing about afghanistan. and we still don't. we're trying to civilize the place. it works like north american natives. it's tribal. and we want to make a democracy? so anyway, my question is, do you really believe what you wrote can make a difference to the human condition? >> well, that's an easy question. [laughter] i do believe or -- [laughter] the whole thing is, you know, first of all, i would say -- it's nice to talk about tactics and that kin