guns i mean is really a signal that the information age innermost that quote from your book about rommel saying that the war is fought by quartermasters long before the battle begins i think you know so much that is put toward that kind of controlling and understanding information and logistics and supplies and and all that but what happened in as or for john which i just hinted at is that this thing a been in a stalemate between these 2 territories for the you know like 20 or 30 years and then they came in with a bunch of drones and within a month were able to force their millions into really a terrible compromise it was because of drone technology so when you can do that without risking the life of the young people from your country there becomes a disconnect between the political will that's required for politicians to conduct war and actually doing it is are there examples of that historically that where countries from able to pay mercenaries to fight wars for them so that they didn't require the political will of their people. walk necessary was have been common throughout history a

rays rommel's spectroscopy ultraviolet an infrared pictures among other techniques to uncover its secrets. the masters painting technique was examined beyond the surface were correct and made to the painting was anything over painted did leonardo paint the piece in one session or did he work on it for decades. these questions must be answered in order to resolve the most puzzling question of them all. who is the woman behind the smiling yet melancholy face. who was leonardo's mona lisa. this is not a portrait. but rather an imaginary image of an ideal beauty. experts have been wondering this for centuries. seems to be proof of only 2 explanations but he cancels the other out you talk mentation comes from 2 different chroniclers but these written records are not compatible with one another. the most accepted theory is based on biography george over sorry but according to him the portrait depicts lisa. the wife of the florentine so much and francesco down to condo who commissioned the piece in 1503. this contradicts a note by the chronicle antonio to be artists from 1517 in which leonardo d

no carved or cast figure of rommel. or of hitler, himself, looms above a german city, as lee or jeb stewart has historically done above virginia's capitol. though, of course, the statues of richmond's monument avenue, they're not really meant to honor their nominal subjects. they went up around the turn of the 21st century as a way to remind us all of who was once more in charge. and now, of course, that's changing. in this very summer, as we've all seen in the news. richmond, itself, has decided to remove the confederate memorials it controls. those to stewart, stonewall jackson, and jefferson davis. a an injunction against the removal has been thrown out. the removal proceedings, i think, may now be done. the enormous statue of robert e. lee remains. but many of us have seen pictures of the changes made to it, this summer. and know that the circle around it has become a space where african-american dance troops have been performing and where graffiti artists have been at work. the south's own work in confronting its p

membersd of the rommell's courts were divided on how to reconcile the fractured decision with existing precedent. this division cleared clear to pastor holding that ramos applies retroactivelynd her teague treat to pass for providing remedy to those jailed by a jury scheme we know morally wrong at the inception and is unconstitutional. for some justices it was dead on arrival in the diding votes rationale was foreclosed by president but provided no presidential value and from most is an old rule dictated by precedent that restored the sixth amendment's full measure either thrgh due process clause of the privileges or clause of the 14th amendment. furtherustices it was a wrongly decided decision and needed to be explicitly overruled. for these members of the court ramos should be a watershed rule for required for a trek to be as this restores fairness inaccuracy to jury trials in louisiana. vote pass ass remedy something e all know to be wrong. both paths will provide e promise of a fair trial to all louiana's. mr. chief justice i'm ready to entertain questions fromom the court. >> than