>>ronald contreraz: yes.this is alisa pittman and i believe the proposed dream line administrative resolution program is an improvement over the current program. it is morestraightforward , the fines are transparent and more importantly, it covers many more substantive areas than the currentprogram. i do have a few comments regarding specificitems . the first is item number 18 . the contractor contribution. the provision which is on page 13 of 36 and this item applies to a committee which is lawfully received a contribution for city contractor and one of the stated exclusions from the programs is evidence that the contributionthat a contributor tried to conceal unlawful contributions . hence the penalty is against the recipient committee, it seems unfair to block committee from participating in the start program due to the badbehavior of the contributor . it would be more appropriate that the exclusionary language provided, that the committee tried to conceal the unlawful contributions. the second item is ite