and that's why when ronald truman says that he believes the 2 teams relatively similar, will have the same sort of chauncey's fits because he knows the english game pretty well. so what we have here is, as it were 2 countries who have a prior history, the one that says the actual, the netherlands having won this tournament a long time ago in the old. now this incident, continuing to the 2026, woke up, missing, hasn't moved it out. see the as i've said before, i intend to continue an attempt to keep living day by day without thinking about what will come in the future or whether all continue or not. it's something i just live every day. i'm 37 years old under god knows when the end will be a mess. he did reply from international football often to 2016 corporate america, the reverse this decision 7 weeks late to since then, he schooled 50 full goals and 73 games and guided them to the carpet and woke up trophies like a catalog at the end of the day or a 7 time limit and champion and about joking. it's just 3 to the semi finals without breaking a sweat. so off to his last days of violenc

they also tried to shoot gary truman and presidential candidate george wallace. march 30, 1981 ronalding the hotel after his speech. the president will be seen at close range shoot six times. one of the bullets will hit the target, pierce the chest, enter the left lung and pass one and a half centimeters from the heart. regan will be saved by a miracle. the bleeding politician will be quickly taken to the hospital and after surgery he will recover from his wounds. of course, there have been periods of instability in american history when this kind of assassination attempt occurred frequently, and periods of national unity and stability when this happened decisively, but now i think that americans are entering another period of instability, so this kind of we will see more and more political violence, attacks, assassinations, everything else, so here american institutions really stop working properly, the political system is going into disarray, well, against this background, of course , there is a surge in violence now... not only of the ordinary population, but politicians and even p

we tried. also shoot harry truman and presidential candidate george walos. march 30, 1981 ronaldas leaving the hotel after his speech. in the president will be shot six times at close range. one of the bullets will hit the target, pierce the chest, enter the left lung and pass one and a half centimeters away. of course, there have been periods of instability in american history when this kind of assassination attempt happened frequently, and periods of national unity and stability when it happened decisively, but now i think that americans are entering another period of instability, so we will continue to see this type of political violence more and more attacks, assassination attempts of everything the rest, therefore, here american institutions really... are no longer working properly, the political system is falling apart, well, against this background, of course, there is a surge in violence against not only the ordinary population, but politicians and even presidential candidates. the shooter was released in 2013 and still lives in virginia, like our next hero. on may 10 , 2

they also tried to shoot harry truman and presidential candidate george wallace. march 30, 1981 ronaldn came out from the hotel after his performance. the president. at close range they will shoot six times, one of the bullets will hit the target, pierce the chest, enter the left lung and pass one and a half centimeters from the heart. regan will be saved by a miracle; the bleeding politician will be quickly taken to the hospital and after surgery he will recover from his wounds. of course, in american history there have been periods of instability when this type of assassination attempt occurred frequently, and periods of national unity and stability when it was decided. now i think that the americans are entering another period of instability, so we will see more and more of this kind of political violence, attacks, assassinations, everything else, so here american institutions really stop working properly, the political system is falling apart, well, against this background, of course, there is a surge violence is observed against not only the ordinary population, but politicians an

truman administration. at one point, a strong ideological skew among historian as against ronald reagan almost did him in. amid the disclosure of the iran-contra affair in 1988 american heritage ran an article by irwin friedman that put reagan in the same category as grant harding and nixon, complete with a cartoon one showing the four presidents falling into a hellish fiery pit around the same time, in his private correspondence, see woodward, despite doing his part during the 1950s to perpetuate the corruption narrative. describe the traditional narrative about the gilded age, including grant's presidency, as a howling anachronism compared to later misconduct. now, the notion that reagan belonged in a presidential pantheon of corruption never stuck, but historians have not quite gotten the memo regarding the misunderstanding of grant on that subject. now, there were, to be sure who proved unworthy during grant's administration, but among his principal subordinates, the individual cases don't really stand out next to other esteemed presidencies. i go through this case by case in my essay, i'll say to sum

ronald reagan general photo. andrew jackson, you know, people who are just mentally de stubs o, as in the case of the shooters with presidents, truman or roosevelt, people who are just on the very extreme fringes of american society, extreme nationalists, and so on. whereas when we look today, if we take the incidence of january, the 6 wave, it says something to be cited for finding why the segments of society, even members of o x members of the armed forces being part of this the way it is to set the norms of what's acceptable, the norms of stability, intolerance have changed, norms of what's acceptable in terms of political violence can change. and i believe that in large part, this is due to the fact that as i was mentioning before, trump hasn't accepted the election results. and it has cast a doubt under legitimacy, though we know they're free and fair a. and in doing so, if you look at other countries where, you know, they are struggling with democracy where there's casting out of their election, political violence often follows. and as we've seen with the decision on the capital, and everybody has seen it, and a lot of people

was, the judiciary was captured by liberals after truman and kennedy and johnson and carter, all these libs on the judiciary standing in the way of ronald reagan and his administration which represents the people -- he won the commanding majority in 1980. i was going to say 1950. [laughter] conservatives believed this entitled to their administration to deference from the courts. it is interesting to me they have turned against this difference in the same moment they turned against the notion that they can win democratically consistently enough to hold power. the two are connected. they are part of the same project of doing as much as possible to remove governance from democratically accountable institutions into the ones they believe they can hold in perpetuity, whether that is courts, state legislatures, whatever it might be. >> in our less panel, professor norris was -- last panel, professor norris was talking about, it seems so apparent we should call it opportunism we see coming from the court. really quickly, i think you wanted to tie that up and then i got to go on -- we have not even gotten to guns yet. >> this is creating a ton

truman. more recently, there were two assassination attempts within a month on president ford. and then, there was an assassination attempt on ronaldgan. none of those actually changed, if you will, the outcome in any significant way. so, that is the historical record. and it probably gives us some, if you well, comfort that this event is not what people think it is, just because if you look at history there have been several -- more than several of these events, and they have been shocking of course, but they haven't changed the trajectory. what is perhaps different this time is that trump is running on an authoritarian platform, if you like. and he has been encouraging violence. we know that. so, america at this moment might be the least stable world power going into the election. but biden, to his credit, did give a speech that was appropriate. there was nothing in it that was offensive to anyone. it was all the right response. i think it is premature to draw the conclusion that this is a watershed event, because i don't think that is clear from any indication in history. tom: that is a really important nuance around what we are

ronald reagan institute and president biden will be giving one of the most consequential speeches of his presidency at 5:00 pm today at the mellon auditorium in washington dc where president harry trumanesigned the original treaty 75 years ago. the alliance goal hasn't changed ... but the rise of populist national movements in europe and increased isolationism here in the u.s. puts nato at an crossroads. allies worry about instability in the u.s. and allies scrambled to prepare for a possible trump presidency amidst his repeated threats to stop funding the war in ukraine and pull out of nato. today the leader of the world's largest democracy, and yes prime minister warmly embraced russian -- russian president vladimir putin in moscow, an affront to nato. one thing that has changed in the past three years, when biden became president, only nine of the 32 members were spending 2 percent or more of their gdp on defence. now 23 nato allies are doing so, and achievement president biden will highlight tonight. those not pulling their weight however include canada, spain, italy and belgium. >> i want you to meet next to the president of poland who says forget 2 percent, we should have it at

the ronald reagan institute and present biden will be given one of the most consequential speeches of his presidency at 5:00 p.m. today in the auditorium in washington, d.c. were president harry trumanthe treaty making the u.s. 1 of 12 and eight founding member 75 years ago. the alliance's goal has not changed to counter the rise of russia and at the time and the soviet union to protect the hard fought gains against authoritarian rulers in world war ii. the rise of populist nationalist movements in europe and increased isolationism in the u.s. puts nato at a crossroads what used to be a feeling of unity is now filling us with anxiety as they worry about instability in the u.s. and allies scramble to prepare for a possible trump presidency with the repeated threats to pull out of nato if there is not a an increase in defense spending. >> you have to pay and they said what would happen if we don't and we won't defend you against russia. >> this is the leader of the world's largest democracy india's prime minister warmly embraced vladimir putin today in moscow and attempt to create a new alliance in counterpoint to moscow. after targeting a hospital in care of killing more than 42 peop

was, the judiciary was captured by liberals after truman and kennedy and johnson and carter, all these libs on the judiciary standing in the way of ronaldeagan and his administration which represents the people -- he won the commanding majority in 1980. i was going to say 1950. [laughter] conservatives believed this entitled to their administration to deference from the courts. it is interesting to me they have turned against this difference in the same moment they turned against the notion that they can win democratically consistently enough to hold power. the two are connected. they are part of the same project of doing as much as possible to remove governance from democratically accountable institutions into the ones they believe they can hold in perpetuity, whether that is courts, state legislatures, whatever it might be. >> in our less panel, professor norris was -- last panel, professor norris was talking about, it seems so apparent we should call it opportunism we see coming from the court. really quickly, i think you wanted to tie that up and then i got to go on -- we have not even gotten to guns yet. >> this is creating a ton m