>> i'm not aware of that happening, supervisor ronen. >> supervisor ronen: mr. keeffe? >> the individuals we refer for criminal prosecution, we keep as confidential. >> supervisor ronen: chair melgar? >> supervisor melgar: thank you, supervisor ronen. so just going back to something that supervisor peskin was talking about in terms of the potential for legislation to increase penalties, especially -- of culture change within and without the department, so i hope that we can work together to give you the tools that you will need to do this, even if it's, like, major changes. just like i think contractors don't go off and do stuff without being paid for it if the owners are not paying for it, they're not going to do it. i also think that somebody like bernard curran, who was supposed to do 25 to 30 inspections a year and ended up doing 300, those extra 270 inspections were just for a reason. i don't think he went out there for the heck of it and didn't expect something because we don't do that as humans, right? so i'm just wondering what we're going to do in terms of, you

>> i'm not aware of that happening, supervisor ronen. >> supervisor ronen: mr. keeffe? >> the individuals we refer for criminal prosecution, we keep as confidential. >> supervisor ronen: chair melgar? >> supervisor melgar: thank you, supervisor ronen. so just going back to something that supervisor peskin was talking about in terms of the potential for legislation to increase penalties, especially -- of culture change within and without the department, so i hope that we can work together to give you the tools that you will need to do this, even if it's, like, major changes. just like i think contractors don't go off and do stuff without being paid for it if the owners are not paying for it, they're not going to do it. i also think that somebody like bernard curran, who was supposed to do 25 to 30 inspections a year and ended up doing 300, those extra 270 inspections were just for a reason. i don't think he went out there for the heck of it and didn't expect something because we don't do that as humans, right? so i'm just wondering what we're going to do in terms of, you

>> i'm not aware of that happening, supervisor ronen. >> supervisor ronen: mr. keeffe? >> the individuals we refer for criminal prosecution, we keep as confidential. >> supervisor ronen: chair melgar? >> supervisor melgar: thank you, supervisor ronen. so just going back to something that supervisor peskin was talking about in terms of the potential for legislation to increase penalties, especially -- of culture change within and without the department, so i hope that we can work together to give you the tools that you will need to do this, even if it's, like, major changes. just like i think contractors don't go off and do stuff without being paid for it if the owners are not paying for it, they're not going to do it. i also think that somebody like bernard curran, who was supposed to do 25 to 30 inspections a year and ended up doing 300, those extra 270 inspections were just for a reason. i don't think he went out there for the heck of it and didn't expect something because we don't do that as humans, right? so i'm just wondering what we're going to do in terms of, you

supervisor ronen. my office had a chance to review into the record last night and we made some small tweaks to approval as to reform. she circulated a very small draft to your aid this morning. i don't think the one you read into the record is the one she sent to him. again, the changes are very minor. >> supervisor ronen: would you mind reading the changes? do you have them in front of you? >> i do. the sfpd shall first present. all juvenile delinquency cases where, one, all the allege criminal acts occurred within the city and county of san francisco. two, the san francisco police department is the lead or sole investigative agency and, three, california welfare institutions code section 651 current commence proceedings in the juvenile delinquency court in san francisco superior court or any other county. i believe that's. >> supervisor ronen: okay. fantastic. >> i'm happy to send it out as you hear public comment, but i wanted to make sure that if it's this version that the board is taking action on

next then is supervisor ronen. >> supervisor ronen: thank you. i wanted to start out by thanking supervisor melgar for the in memoriam for yolanda lopez. this incredible artist and icon rest in peace and power. and, secondly, the resolution condemning the -- you know, the texas abortion ban. you know, it's just unbelievable to me that governor abbott is responsible for killing children in schools by preventing them from wearing masks on one hand, and yet is forcing women who are not ready or able or willing to have a child to have a child. the hypocrisy of these deadly policies and everyone that supports them is irresponsible. and they should leave public office immediately. so thank you for bringing forward that resolution, and i'm proud to co-sponsor it. and, finally, colleagues, i am excited to co-sponsor a resolution accepting the ula hotel, which a former sro in the mission district, which the city is purchasing with help of the home key program. and i wanted to say on the record that we are very excited and working with homeless youth advoc

supervisor ronen. >> supervisor ronen: yes, thank you. i -- again, i continue to be a bit dumbfounded that this is controversial legislation. there was -- there was disagreement between the police department and the district attorney about one case which has brought about the need for this legislation. they disagree on whether or not a case was brought to the d.a. first to choose, unlike adult cases that, must by law be tried in the county where a crime occurs. in juvenile cases, the d.a. is able to take into account several factors, including where the juvenile lives, what is most convenient for the well-being of that juvenile that has been accused of a crime. and so the d.a. takes that into account usually when presented a case by the police department for a crime committed by a juvenile or, you know, that a juvenile is accused of committing in san francisco. there was disagreement with whether or not a case was presented to the d.a. here in san francisco for the d.a.'s choice on whether or not to prosecute that crime here or in the juv

supervisor ronen? >> supervisor ronen: i want to pull item 48. >> president walton: thank you. supervisor chan? >> supervisor chan: i want to make sure you pull 43 and 44 together. >> president walton: supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: item 47. >> president walton: thank you. supervisor haney? >> supervisor haney: want to make sure i'm added as a cosponsor to items 43, 44, 45, and 47. >> president walton: so, madam clerk, it looks like we'll be voting on item 46, 49, and 50. >> clerk: on items 46, 49, and 50 -- [roll call] >> clerk: there are 11 ayes. >> president walton: thank you, and without objection, these resolutions -- or these motions are adopted and approved unanimously. madam clerk, would you please call items number 43 and 44 together? >> clerk: item 43, resolution to urge governor gavin newsom to sign california state assembly bill number 701, authored by assembly members lorena gonzales, and item 44, resolution urging governor gavin newsom to sign california staten arrest bill numbe

supervisor ronen? >> supervisor ronen: aye. >> supervisor safai: aye. >> supervisor stefani: aye. >> supervisor walton: aye. >> supervisor chan: aye. >> supervisor haney: aye. >> supervisor mandelman: aye. >> supervisor mar: aye. >> supervisor peskin: aye. >> supervisor preston: aye. there are 10 ayes. >> president walton: thank you. and item number 31 is adopted 10-0. madame clerk, it is not quite 3:00. supervisor peskin, are we ready for 18 yet? no, okay, thank you. madame clerk, please call item number 40. 40 was considered by the land use at a regular meeting and was recommended as a committee report. item 40 is emergency ordinance to temporarily extend the covid-19 based limit on residential evictions that allows evictions only if based on the nonpayment of rent, health or safety issues and set to expire on september 30, 2021. i'll state, mr. president, pursuant to the charter, this requires the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the board of supervisors, which is eight votes for passage on one rea

next then is supervisor ronen. >> supervisor ronen: thank you. i wanted to start out by thanking supervisor melgar for the in memoriam for yolanda lopez. this incredible artist and icon rest in peace and power. and, secondly, the resolution condemning the -- you know, the texas abortion ban. you know, it's just unbelievable to me that governor abbott is responsible for killing children in schools by preventing them from wearing masks on one hand, and yet is forcing women who are not ready or able or willing to have a child to have a child. the hypocrisy of these deadly policies and everyone that supports them is irresponsible. and they should leave public office immediately. so thank you for bringing forward that resolution, and i'm proud to co-sponsor it. and, finally, colleagues, i am excited to co-sponsor a resolution accepting the ula hotel, which a former sro in the mission district, which the city is purchasing with help of the home key program. and i wanted to say on the record that we are very excited and working with homeless youth advoc

first up to introduce new business is supervisor ronen. >> supervisor ronen: thank you, colleagues. today i have a few items. the first is a hearing as well as a request to the city attorney both involving dbi and co-sponsored by supervisor peskin. in the 18 months since the suspension and then resignation of former department building inspection head tom huey, following charges of legal violation, further allegations have arisen pointing to a deeper web of corruption at d.b.i. that is both undermining public trust and endangering residents across the city. last friday, mission local reporter published a story alleging missing -- and false inspections on property owned by building inspection commission president angus mccarthy, as well as insider conflicts with d.b.i. clients. last night, the commissioner sent a detailed response refuting every allegation and welcoming investigation. sadly, this supervisor's space in d.b.i. and anyone associated with it has been so eroded by the weekly scandals that are alleged, that with each additional allegation i'll continue to call for a thorou

supervisor ronen.record last night and we made some small tweaks to approval as to reform. she circulated a very small draft to your aid this morning. i don't think the one you read into the record is the one she sent to him. again, the changes are very minor. >> supervisor ronen: would you mind reading the changes? do you have them in front of you? >> i do. the sfpd shall first present. all juvenile delinquency cases where, one, all the allege criminal acts occurred within the city and county of san francisco. two, the san francisco police department is the lead or sole investigative agency and, three, california welfare institutions code section 651 current commence proceedings in the juvenile delinquency court in san francisco superior court or any other county. i believe that's. >> supervisor ronen: okay. fantastic. >> i'm happy to send it out as you hear public comment, but i wanted to make sure that if it's this version that the board is taking action on that. >> supervisor ronen: fantastic. than

supervisor ronen? >> supervisor ronen: yes. i believe i forgot to give you an update on the m.t.c. m.t.c. approved $3 million for the extension. also, earlier this month, m.t.c. took action to approve the transit recovery plan. this is an important plan that will support efforts by the agencies across the region. in late july, the m.t.c. approved the allocation of the first tranche of support funds from the american rescue plan, including $288 million for m.t.a. subsequent tranches will include funding that will be used for those transit transformation section plan items or other [inaudible] recovery strategies. [inaudible] and finally, plan bay area 2050 is still on final approval schedule this year with a special meeting at [inaudible] we continue to voice concern about the need for an [inaudible]. >> supervisor safai: -- as it goes forward in terms of the investment, but the biggest issue is dealing with the updated recruitment and hiring of a new c.e.o. we should have some good information there. a

. >> ronen, second. >> chair: seconded by ronen.n we have a roll call vote, please. >> clerk: on item 3: [roll call taken] >> clerk: we have three ayes. the motion passes. >> chair: great. this will be approved. thank you. madam clerk, can you please call item 4. >> clerk: item 4: introduction of new items. this is an information item. >> chair: great. are there any new items? i don't see any. do we have to call public comment on this? >> clerk: no, not if there are no new items introduced. >> chair: will you please call the next item. >> clerk: item 5: public comment. >> chair: are there any members of the public who want to speak? >> clerk: yes. we have a hand raised. hello, caller, your two minutes begins now. >> caller: hello, my name is bartley sanders. and i was wondering if we could, based on the information of the toll overall, if there is any federal requirement for an environment justice review to be done? and if there is a requirement for one to be done, is there a place that i can go to find that report about the impacts

would you like to speak before supervisor safai, supervisor ronen? >> supervisor ronen: sure. i'm just getting the agenda up. i would like to make a motion to reject the appeal and support the underlying project. >> second. >> president walton: my apologies. can you repeat that for the record? i'm not sure if the microphone was on. >> clerk: the microphone was on, but perhaps it's our masks that -- >> supervisor ronen: i'm sorry. let me get that. i would like to make a motion to approve item 28 and to file number 29 and 30. >> clerk: i believe that was a motion to approve item 28 and table 29 and 30? >> supervisor ronen: yes. >> president walton: got it. and it was seconded by...supervisor melgar. thank you. supervisor safai? >> supervisor safai: thank you, mr. president. thank you, colleagues, and thank you to all the callers that called in today, both for and against. these are not easy decisions. as many of you know, we've been through this before on these types of topics, and this is a particularly -- this appeal is a particularly tough decision for me for many reasons. in

i've e-mailed hillary ronen. to mr. walton, i called his office yesterday. talked with a guy who said he's going to reach out. what i'm asking for is not outrageous and i should be entitled to that and when i called back today because he saw no contact by president walton's office. he was not even there, the guy that took the call yesterday. he left no note and i have requested a personal e-mail to the president's office, to hillary ronen's office and stefani's office and you guys come to your offices and you guys disregard me and call the sheriff on me thinking they're going to do the job and you guys call me, we need to look into it. four months later, rinse and repeat. you're twittering away saying you're outraged about how people like me are being treated. but when i come to the office by e-mail, it's a stand offish we don't care. >> clerk: thank you. >> staff has tried to send me. >> clerk: thank you to the caller. thank you for your comments. operations, do we have another caller on the line? i understand we have twelve listeners and four who are in th

i've e-mailed hillary ronen. to mr. walton, i called his office yesterday. talked with a guy who said he's going to reach out. what i'm asking for is not outrageous and i should be entitled to that and when i called back today because he saw no contact by president walton's office. he was not even there, the guy that took the call yesterday. he left no note and i have requested a personal e-mail to the president's office, to hillary ronen's office and stefani's office and you guys come to your offices and you guys disregard me and call the sheriff on me thinking they're going to do the job and you guys call me, we need to look into it. four months later, rinse and repeat. you're twittering away saying you're outraged about how people like me are being treated. but when i come to the office by e-mail, it's a stand offish we don't care. >> clerk: thank you. >> staff has tried to send me. >> clerk: thank you to the caller. thank you for your comments. operations, do we have another caller on the line? i understand we have twelve listeners and four who are in th

our district supervisor is hillary ronen. article 25 on page 24 of exhibit h, under section 1514, notice of final determination, types of noticed required, states that for the members of the board of supervisors who represent the district in which the approved personal wireless service facility would be located, since hillary ronen was not notified, the final determination notice did not meet the required notification. the proposed wireless facility at 231 dwight utilizes a six-foot crossbar that is 10 foot in length, and close to 2 feet in height and integrated radios attached at either end of the crossbar. and i think, alex, if you'd pull up the photograph, the map is following the proposed photograph of the wireless antennas, and those integrated antennas are going to be attached to either end of the crossbar. included in the design is a small meter and a 5-g location box. these proposed additions will be moved to the top of the pole. in 2009, decision by the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit in a case i

our district supervisor is hillary ronen. article 25 on page 24 of exhibit h, under section 1514, notice of final determination, types of noticed required, states that for the members of the board of supervisors who represent the district in which the approved personal wireless service facility would be located, since hillary ronen was not notified, the final determination notice did not meet the required notification. the proposed wireless facility at 231 dwight utilizes a six-foot crossbar that is 10 foot in length, and close to 2 feet in height and integrated radios attached at either end of the crossbar. and i think, alex, if you'd pull up the photograph, the map is following the proposed photograph of the wireless antennas, and those integrated antennas are going to be attached to either end of the crossbar. included in the design is a small meter and a 5-g location box. these proposed additions will be moved to the top of the pole. in 2009, decision by the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit in a case i

our district supervisor is hillary ronen. article 25 on page 24 of exhibit h, under section 1514, notice of final determination, types of noticed required, states that for the members of the board of supervisors who represent the district in which the approved personal wireless service facility would be located, since hillary ronen was not notified, the final determination notice did not meet the required notification. the proposed wireless facility at 231 dwight utilizes a six-foot crossbar that is 10 foot in length, and close to 2 feet in height and integrated radios attached at either end of the crossbar. and i think, alex, if you'd pull up the photograph, the map is following the proposed photograph of the wireless antennas, and those integrated antennas are going to be attached to either end of the crossbar. included in the design is a small meter and a 5-g location box. these proposed additions will be moved to the top of the pole. in 2009, decision by the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit in a case i

supervisor ronen, and they will be reaching out to her. they volunteered to do that. we had a guest from district 7, supervisor melgar's office, attend our last meeting, but the supervisor has responded to one of her constituents that hits sits on her council, and they have a potential candidate and our council member will be meeting with the supervisor in the potential council member this month. so hopefully in october we'll have more report, but i feel like we're making progress. and the best news is our representative in district 8 was reappointed on july 27th. he just hadn't been told. and their term will end in 2023. so we're getting there. we still have two commission vacancies, but, again, we have potential candidates. and we may well submit the name of the attendee of our last meeting who had a lot of interest and we didn't scare away at the meeting. so in our july meeting, we talked about the cost of doing business, and some questions had come up at the last dignity oversight committee, and deputy director cindy koffman was with u

. >> chairman: and ronen. >> clerk: and ronen. thank you. >> chairman: please call item 2. >> clerk: item 2: the report, and this is an information item. >> chairman: is vice chair klein here? it looks like we might not have vice chair klein yet. going once, going twice? all right. let's come back to item 2. madam clerk, please call item. >> clerk: item 3: approve the minutes of the july 27, 2021, meeting. this is an action item. >> chairman: i don't see any comments or questions from colleagues. we should open this item to public comment. >> there is no public comment comment. >> chairman: all right. public comment on item 3 is closed. is there a motion to approve the minutes, item 3? >> moved by melgar. >> chairman: thank you, commissioner melgar. is there a second? >> second. >> chairman: thank you, commissioner walton. seconded by walton. madam clerk, please call the roll on item 3. >> clerk: yes. on item 3: [roll call taken] >> clerk: there are 11 ayes. the minutes are approved. >> chairman: it looks to me like vice chair kle

. >> supervisor ronen: present. safai absent. >> supervisor stefani: present. >> supervisor walton: present. vice chair, we have quorum. >> vice chair peskin: thank you, madame clerk. just one housekeeping matter which is if i could ask my friend and former colleague and bart board member to turn your camera off until we get to item number 9 when you can turn your camera on. we go to our executive director's report. the floor is yours. >> good morning, vice chair and commissioners. may i suggest -- at the end of the meeting so that we can prioritize the information items from m.t.a. and the bart staff? >> vice chair peskin: sure, without objection we'll continue the item until the end of the meeting. with that, please read item number 3. >> prior to reading item 3, i would like to announce about public comment if that's okay? >> vice chair peskin: please. >> public comment will be available for you via telephone by calling 1-415-655-0001 and when prompted entering access code 146 678 5125 # #. once you join, you'll

. >> thank you, supervisor ronen. so, we have a couple more supervisors coming up. i'm thrilled to introduce supervisor chan from district 1. >> supervisor chan: good morning, transit riders. it's good to be here today. i came to san francisco's chinatown when i was 13 years old. i went to galleio high school and the 30 stop was my jam. that was great. i went to u.c. davis, but still used public transit. greyhound and m-track and then when i came back to work to the city, it was getting a little harder. but my first gig in city hall as an aide, i was still living in chinatown and i had the best ride to work. it was on cable car and it was awesome. i love public transit, but at the same time, you know, as my work got more demanding, life was a little bit more demanding, you know, riding around, bus hopping was not easy and for any of you who've done bus hopping in san francisco, you know it takes some time. if you miss that transfer, you know what, you can just get a lot of anxiety going on in you waiting for that next bus. so i know that means we need to do better w

websites suggested that supervisor mandelman and mar are on the board with supervisor ronen and on theanning committee. i know. >> chairman: no. >> in any event, i assume you'll straighten that out. on this matter, i look forward to the agreement and we will need clear guidance with ethics with examples and scenarios distributed to all board and commission. members, department heads, campaign consultants, lobbyists, friends of groups, political committees and i would require existing board and commission members and department heads to sign an acknowledgement form that they have received, read, and understand the new requirements. i would encourage the city attorney to update the good government guide and finally, i'm hoping that the refuge working group will meet again sometime today. that's all i have on this right now. thanks. >> chairman: thank you. are there any other members of the public for public comment on this item number one? >> clerk: that completes our list of public comment callers. >> chairman: thank you, mr. young. so, colleagues, what i think we should do is so we can

. >> thank you, supervisor ronen. so, we have a couple more supervisors coming up. i'm thrilled to introduce supervisor chan from district 1. >> supervisor chan: good morning, transit riders. it's good to be here today. i came to san francisco's chinatown when i was 13 years old. i went to galleio high school and the 30 stop was my jam. that was great. i went to u.c. davis, but still used public transit. greyhound and m-track and then when i came back to work to the city, it was getting a little harder. but my first gig in city hall as an aide, i was still living in chinatown and i had the best ride to work. it was on cable car and it was awesome. i love public transit, but at the same time, you know, as my work got more demanding, life was a little bit more demanding, you know, riding around, bus hopping was not easy and for any of you who've done bus hopping in san francisco, you know it takes some time. if you miss that transfer, you know what, you can just get a lot of anxiety going on in you waiting for that next bus. so i know that means we need to do better w