economy plan to reform the tax system, says the deputy head of the office of the president, rostislav shurmae working name of the tax model 10-10 i.e., tax rates on the added value of incomes of physios and on the profits of enterprises will be reduced to 10%." all together, says the co-author of the concept andriy dligach, will help bring the business out of the shadows and overcome corruption in tax ukrainian entrepreneurs in poland, bulgaria, the czech republic, romania receive better conditions for doing business, including tax authorities than in ukraine. we cannot continue the horror that happened in july, when due to the blocking of tax invoices, 72,000 entrepreneurs faced money laundering problems with actually blocking their activities to take radical steps, the ministry of finance says that because the reform in the first year may cause a budget deficit of 50 billion dollars very there are at least 268 young people there three years ago, the loss that will be achieved by the reduction, well, the liquidation and the reduction of the new base rates will need somewhere in the order of

about another topic about printing money, this is very interesting an interview on forbes with rostislav shurma, who is the deputy head of the president's office, among many different things he said there, for example, he said that the emission of the hryvnia, that is, a friend of the hryvnia, under certain conditions, can easily amount to 30 to 60 billion hryvnias per month in e-e. the day before, the left bank publication published a column by the head of the national bank of ukraine, kyryll shevchenko, where he says something completely different. he says that not financing emissions to central banks imposes a hidden inflationary tax on society and can lead to catastrophic and long-term consequences, why do officials say so many different things , even though they are responsible for our economic policy. well, in one way or another, yevgeny , can you explain this schizophrenia in our government, after all, the government and the national bank are responsible for our economic policy of ukraine, this is one of his key functions, his third function after humanitarian stability and financial sta

i would like us to quote the deputy head of the president's office, rostislav shurma. he says that i am a big supporter of such radical tax changes, and he believes that they should probably be done now. this is our unique chance to change the culture of paying taxes in the country. i ask for your comment. i would not say that there are any negative news in this idea, first of all, the cancellation of benefits is a positive phenomenon and, like the reform itself, it is a way for us to eventually destroy this corrupt base for corruption, or rather, the base for the existence of this corruption, how do they exist, there are corrupt officials in tax and customs in other areas, but first of all in the tax field, they force businesses, instead of paying taxes honestly, due to pressure to engage in optimization schemes and, accordingly, share paying this service to tax officials, respectively, how does business adapt to high taxes in ukraine , he agrees to optimization with partial payment of this corrupt lease unfortunately, such a phenomenon is quite common, it cannot be s

the so-called tax reform 10 10 that i mentioned the representative of the president's office, rostislav shurma, in his interview with forbes magazine, what do you think , is it a relevant idea to reduce taxes to 10% at the moment, does such an idea work? i understand that everyone likes low taxes, but does it work, yevgeny, let's start with you well, let's start with the fact that tax reform is really needed in ukraine, it is already overdue and overdue, well, this does not mean that any proposal that is submitted under the word tax reform, it is real, useful and correct, in this case there are many problems and many comments among economists, the main observation is that no one has seen the calculations, only seen the presentations, where everything is cool , in fact, if you calculate, for example, yes, then for such a decrease in the rates of our main vat tax, we need to compensate for these increases, compensate for the increase, to reach the budget, we need for consumption, that is, the economy grew by at least twice as much compared to the pre-crisis times. this is absolutely unrealistic

or second month of autumn, the surname is already mentioned there and oleksandr kubrakov and rostislav shurma and other world figures there will still be sent to the ukrainian political community denys's resignation that i am burying his government yulia, i am asking yulia klymenko, well, information, but yes, there is no final information now, but i have a feeling that you will be replaced in the fall and if the prime minister resigns. well, he is the entire cabinet of ministers . thank you, mr. rostislav, what are your predictions you know , nothing can be ruled out here, but this is exactly what we were talking about two minutes ago. it seems to me that it is absolutely wrong that we should be guessing. responsible behavior in times of war, after all, logic, including personnel decisions, must be presented to society, and then there will be more trust and more opportunities to cooperate. and according to your information, what else will be on the agenda of the deputies in the near future, mr. rostyslav, tax reform is just a beautiful informational the reason is that it is really preparing

the hryvnia can be from 30 to 60 billion per month. the deputy head of the president's office, rostislav shurma an interview with force, according to him, this is a range that will not create problems, but this is provided that export-import operations are balanced , the issue is resolved with the payment of the national debt, and the support of international partners will be preserved. as well as a ten-percent tax on the purchase of currency, we will now create about uh currency and hryvnias and about ovdp i still want to question you uh p vasyl you say we need to raise rates they of course lower than the current level of inflation, but if you say that the state should do it, the question arises. why don’t we raise it, there is no resource, another understanding of financial policy, please explain how much you then increased this percentage. when he was recently asked something similar, that is, the ministry of finance has enough professional specialists today who can determine the level of yield on our domestic state loan bonds . to be honest, they are even more attractive. well, if there is