0nce thatis passed on for royal assent. 0nce that is given it becomes law. years and turned 101 in march. and now the legendary dame vera lynn could be about to win two major awards. she's been nominated forfemale artist and album of the year at the forthcoming classic brits awards. she'll also get a lifetime achievement award as our entertainment correspondent colin patterson reports. # we'll meet again, don't know where, don't know when... dame vera lynn has received awards throughout her career. in 1945 she was given both the war medal and the burma star for entertaining the troops. but now at the age of 101 she finds herself nominated in two competitive categories at the classic brit awards. it is on the back of the success of the album vera lynn 100, released last year, and featuring re— orchestrated versions of some of the best—known songs and digitally created at us with the likes of the host of pointless, alexander armstrong. # balbi bluebirds over... the album will only scaf off number one by ed sheerin and drake. the classic routes say that what sh

and when the queen signed the royal assent for the bill allowing a quality of marriage, he said -- sheaid, i couldn't mention this in 1953. it is really extraordinary, isn't it? just wonderful. and she handed over. that's a nice story and i hope it is true but it has nothing to do with political correctness. it has to do with human decency. it's that simple. [applause] rebuttals, strong opening statements. let's move into the moderated cross examination portion of and get both sides and engaging on some of the key issues here. i think what we have heard is a bit of tension. more,draw it out a bit for the rights of groups to be included to have the opportunity for individuality, and a belief on the other side that there is a threat here when these groups are overly privileged through affirmative action or other outcome-oriented processes. isn't there harm that is done to groups by privileging their group identity, whether it be a group identity of race or gender, and not immediately treating them as individuals, in the way jordan would like to see them first? michael: there was no rando

when the clean signed in the royal assent for the bill, allowing the quality of marriage, she said, lordu know, i cannot imagine this in 1953. really, it is extraordinary, isn't it? anded itderful and hi over. withes not have to do political correctness. it is human decency, it is that simple. [applause] ms. goldberg: some good rebuttals -- mr. griffiths: strong rebuttals. let's move into the moderated cross examination portion of this debate. guests on both sides engage in some of the key issues. what we have heard is a bit of tension. let's draw it between the rights of groups to feel included to have your words, michelle for the opportunity for india agility. on the other side, there is something that is a threat when these groups are overly privileged through affirmative action or other outcome oriented processes. there harm done to groups by pillaging their group identity -- by privileging their group identity and not really treating them as individuals in a way toward an and stephen would like to see them first? prof. dyson: there was no arbitrary and random distinction people of c