of court. no, you have to understand... excuse me, we're actually talking about the royal courts of justice. than face that justice, you ran away excuse me, we're actually talking about the royal courts of justice. rather than face that justice, you ran away to france illegally. it depends. well, you know that if you go back to london, you will be locked up for contempt of court. no... before, yes. are you saying that in your experience, some of the uk's key institutions, politics, judicial, whatever, were corrupted by russian money? of course, of course. and yet you are still a wealthy man. you are now completely cut off from russia. you cut your ties just from putin, from yourformer... tell me how strong you think putin is within russia today. but that ability he has had for 20 years to mold the russian mindset — why then do you say he's not strong? that makes him very strong. we in a sense turn to people like you for insights into putin's mind. but i end up being puzzled by the things you say, because at the same time you say, a, putin is driven by money. you make him sound in a way like

where charles bronson was with the panel and his lawyer but we were able to watch it from the royal courts of justicesponsible for charles bronson and he said while he was no longer violent she did not think he would be able to cope with life outside prison and most intriguingly we heard from bronson himself and he started by telling the panel that he had done more porridge than goldilocks and the three bears. at times the hearing was punctuated by laughter, afterjust over an hour bronson said he was bored and when talking about taking a prison governor hostage he said there is nothing like wrapping a governor up like a christmas turkey, heened by saying in his gravelly voice give me a chance, a break, to prove to you people that i'm just a normal geezer, wanting to get on with his life, and the parole board has a fortnight to make its decision. daniel, thank you. . now a look at some other stories making the news today. the british medical association says it will ballot consultant doctors in england on possible industrial action in a dispute over pay and pensions. the ballot will get under way next

the royal courts of justice , despite royal courts of justice, despite deciding to enter in that waye oh associate newspapers. they have strongly denied any of these allegations. they describe them as smears and they claim that this legal action being taken by the claimants and their lawyers, a fishing expedition . lawyers, a fishing expedition. they also claim that it is too to make these sorts of claims. now, considering some of the articles in question 30 years old, they use the word stale said that this case needs to be thrown out. but i think it's clear to see patrick that with prince harry, i'm sir elton john, and sadly for us all in the courtroom today, they want to see this case go to a full trial. wow. ali, thank you very very much, lou costello. there are national reports are just outside the courts bringing latest. left latest. prince harry has left the and gentlemen, but the building and gentlemen, but through access , not through the side access, not through the side access, not through the side access, not through the main entrance, of course strolled through, course th

we are live from the royal courts of justice . 48 royal courts of justice. 48 years in prison, sevent will number eight be the one where he's finally released into the public? we'll recap. day one and look at today, too. and you could see some snow on poole's shoulders. there it is covering large parts of the country overnight. the uk is facing a cold that could facing a cold snap that could see temperatures dip as low as —15 degrees. weather warnings are still in place this morning with forecasts of rain, sleet and snow. thank you very much indeed for getting in touch today. challenged my grunts, people are saying , christine, people are saying, christine, good morning, christine. i hope this bill is passed. i voted for brexit to get our borders back . brexit to get our borders back. but will you? that's what we'll be asking the home secretary. how realistic is that? wish card says the only way we will stop this is for europe to put their borders back up. and victoria says charity begins at home. our politicians help and care politicians must help and care for country first. and for

joining us now from outside the royal courts of justice is gb news reporter paul hawkins. ah so we've had an hour of the hearing today. let me just very quickly give you the background to phil because this is quite a technical case. if i just you the headline from the daily mail thatis the headline from the daily mail that is being contended it was printed in february last year and it says how prince harry tried to keep his legal fight with the government police bodyguards a secret . and then he bodyguards a secret. and then he goes on to say, then just minutes after the broke, minutes after the story broke, his machine to put his pr machine tried to put a positive on the dispute article essentially about prince harry's security arrangements being withdrawn or pared back by the home office and the coverage of prince harry's request, a judicial review into that home office decision. now there are certain parts to this libel case. the first pop was last summer when a judge ruled the article was and he and the article was and he and the article gave readers the impression that

black london taxi, flanked by his security and made his way through the front doors of the royal courts of justiceistening to the submissions that were being made was making notes in a notebook in front of him and the actress, 84 also sat just to seats away beside him, just some of the famous climbers that are bringing this case against. the associated newspapers many of the daily mail titles are published by them , including the published by them, including the daily mail. the mail on sunday and mail online as well. now they are claiming the claimants that private investigators had been hired by these newspapers. they had tapped into their phone . they had attached microphones into the homes and their cars . into the homes and their cars. they also allege that there was impersonation individuals in order to access hospital records and at private clinics as and they also claim bank accounts have been accessed through illicit means and manipulation. and we heard in the court this morning from their barrister, david sherborne, who said that these allegations range a period from 1993 to 2011 and even

well, paul hawkins is outside the royal courts of justice for us, and it's been quite entertaining at clearly he is wanting the parole board to reflect on the good and the bad of , board to reflect on the good and the bad of, what he's experienced in his life . yeah, experienced in his life. yeah, indeed. he clearly knows that this is only the second parole board hearing ever to be held in public, and it's easily the most high profile impacting court. 76 years, not even speaking today at the courtroom full of the public, the media, some of his supporters and indeed some are still behind the lady behind me with a placard , british with a placard, british injustice because he's changed his name to technically charles salvador in 2014 since salvador and protector of women and children but let's bring you up to date with what's been happening on day today. we've from an independent psychologist commissioned by charles bronson el salvador's legal team who told the parole board hearing that he has mild symptoms of ptsd , partly due to some, in her ptsd, partly due to some, in her words, a b

joined by sir elton john, another one of the claimants in this case, he made his way into the royal courts of justice by his husband and just two seats along from prince harry was the actress. sadie frost. so just some of the high profile claimants appearing person in court . clearly, optics are very court. clearly, optics are very important to these claimants . important to these claimants. they want to be seen in court . they want to be seen in court. there was no need for them to be hit, but they're clearly sending a message that they want to a message that they want this to go to a full trial. so the group of claimants are accusing associated newspapers ltd say that's the publishers of the daily mail , the mail on sunday daily mail, the mail on sunday and the mail online of major breaches , privacy and alleged breaches, privacy and alleged illegal information gathering. david sherborne, who is representing those claimants , representing those claimants, said all seven of them are victims of online awful acts by the including breaking and entry into prior but property the bugging of phones and hom

royal for that. outside the royal courts justice. but let's courts of justice.an speak now to media jonathan code, us? jonathan, thanks code, who us? jonathan, thanks very indeed for your time. very much indeed for your time. and we're just reflecting there on know, this can be pretty on you know, this can be pretty protracted and therefore expensive business for all parties . what can i first say to parties. what can i first say to you? your correspondent did a brilliant job and a whole load of very technical issues. yeah, it is expensive. i mean, i've been suing associated newspapers titles for 30 years and they make is difficult and expensive as they possibly can. so it is going to be expensive. prince harry it's also going to be expensive. associate newspapers, they they obviously think it's worth investing in a fight yeah. and obviously there are issues about the freedom of the press and getting the correct story out there . i mean, obviously in, out there. i mean, obviously in, in terms the cases, there are two issues in terms of libel or alleged libel and

join reporter paul, join national reporter paul, who's outside royal courts who's outside the royal courts of in central london and of justicel london and paul can bring us back up to date with whatever the latest is. paul you. what's going is. paul thank you. what's going on. yeah, this is quite a technical hearing. so you'll forgive me if i just start a little bit of background. patrick is that in 2020, the home office made the decision to back harry's security when both and his family come to the uk. so prince harry decided to put in a judicial review of decision. now, this pre—trial libel hearing is about the coverage that judicial process. no simply an article in the daily mail both the paper and the website in february last yeah the website in february last year. and i'll read you the headune year. and i'll read you the headline because it kind of encapsulates the whole article, how prince tried to keep his legal fight with the government over police bodyguards, a secret . and then he goes on to say, then minutes after then just minutes after the story broke , his pr machine story broke, his pr machine tried a positive

prince harry's legal action, because he has arrived at royal courts of justice in london this afternoonay of the preliminary hearing, that's the picture where he was shaking people outside that's the picture where he was sha high people outside that's the picture where he was sha high . people outside that's the picture where he was sha high . this people outside that's the picture where he was sha high . this isaople outside that's the picture where he was sha high . this is aple outside that's the picture where he was sha high . this is a preliminary the high. this is a preliminary hearing, rather, in the privacy claims made against associated newspaper , publisher of the newspaper, publisher of the daily mail and mail on sunday. now, the mr. justice yesterday warned prince harry and other claimants that they may , quote, claimants that they may, quote, have to adjust their expectation oceans of a private who had flatly rebutted claims that he confessed in quotes to hacking them for associated . so now all them for associated. so now all to play it seems so are now heanng to play it s

of the uk's longest prisoners, 48 years, i think in total. and whether he should remain behind bars , that's cost to the royal bars, that's cost to the royal courts of . justice an update courts of. justice for an update from london, reporter lisa hartle, who's been following the case and it's quite colourful in terms of what bronson has been saying under breath. i gather that in the court buildings buildings , yes. charles bronson buildings, yes. charles bronson as we know him , did actually as we know him, did actually change his name back in 2014 to charles salvador after , the charles salvador after, the artist salvador dali . and he's artist salvador dali. and he's appearing via video link , the appearing via video link, the chairman of the parole board panel outlined a bronson's criminal history as the hearing opened initially sentenced to seven years for armed robbery . seven years for armed robbery. the hearing was told he spent most of the past 48 years behind bars. apart from two brief penods bars. apart from two brief periods of freedom when re—offended, bronson was also that the panel had watched a channel 4 documentary about him that aired last w

prince harry bumped into a photographer in that media scrum heading into the front door of the royal courts of justiceave and smile to the waiting press. he does want to be seen by the media to be attending this court case. this is a personal campaign of prince , something he campaign of prince, something he feels very passionately about, which is fighting press intrusion into , his life. well, intrusion into, his life. well, another claimant he was in court today was baroness lawrence. she is the mother of stephen lawrence, who was murdered as a teenagerin lawrence, who was murdered as a teenager in 93. she's another one of the claimants in this case. now, her lawyers allege that associated newspapers is the publishers of the they got hold of information about the investigation . her son's killing investigation. her son's killing through blogging and cover surveillance, including the intercepting of her voicemail messages and paying corrupt police officers for information. now, associates of newspapers , now, associates of newspapers, any of those . but we did see at any of those. but we did see at l

details security fight details of his security fight with government with the british government secret . let's go to the royal secret. let's go to the royal courts of justiceorning. and unless the reporter, hawkins . morning, reporter, paul hawkins. morning, paul. reporter, paul hawkins. morning, paul . yeah. morning, stephen. paul. yeah. morning, stephen. let me just read you the headune let me just read you the headline from the daily mail and from its website printed in february last year. it says how prince harry tried to keep his legal fight with the government over police bodyguards. a secret . and then it goes on to say, then minutes the then just minutes after the story broke , his pr machine story broke, his pr machine tried put a positive spin on tried to put a positive spin on the dispute. now, that is the article in question. it is basically about the security arrangements for the home office withdrew from prince harry and his legal battle to get those that decision reviewed. now his legal team started a case of defamation against associated newspapers who own the daily mail is happening in a series of stages and then possibly it may go to tria