>> rsl, that's actually my concern, less about how it impacts jim call me the man and how it does aboute fbi. the fbi didn't write this book although other people within the fbi were present for some of the activity and deliberations. he is a private citizen and gets to write a book as long as it passes d.o.j.'s pre-publication review which i understand it d did. he has the privilege to do this. my concern is how does it impact the public's view of the fbi. >> it will negatively. >> i think so. this to me feels a little bit, i haven't read the book, i've only read people's commentary and reviews of the book. my sense is that it feels a little bit like a kiss and tell that's been told to soon. other directors have written books about his experience as the fbi director, i think he waited maybe a decade to do that after he had left in the administration had changed. here it just seems like the wounds are too raw and perhaps this feels a little bit like revenge. >> he points out that three presidents are referenced but the others aren't entangled in a special investigation. in this book imp