type contractions come you know, and it turns out that rube goldberg was a cartoonist a sculptor, an inventor, an author, an engineer. so it might be fitting to call on his work. there was an article in sunday's "new york times" about in the travel section about cruises to they mentioned a steam trunk. i think it is falling into common parlance but it is a genre of science fiction or speculative fiction that involves anachronistic combinations but when i went looking for images just to get us all on the same page about what is steam punk, what images is in my mind when i say that it turns out that a couple of years ago this funny 40 fellows also dressed it up in steam punk style. that's been standing in front of a streetcar. and it dates back to really the turn of the 19th and to the 20th century that sort of style which is illustrated on your left. the whole movie, the voyage to the moon was made famous in the scorsese film hugo. so i think it's a lovely aesthetic, and that the copyright practitioner i often think about that because there's a contradiction. you have old technology d

. >> host: the national association of broadcasters says that aereo's ruin goldberg-like -- rube goldberg-like contrivance is a technologically-flawed approach designed solely to circumvent the law. >> guest: i can't even begin to describe on how many levels that's absolutely wrong. it's just insane, that characterization. and let me, so let me start at the beginning of this. we designed -- so the question is why do it the way we're doing it, and i think it's a legitimate question to ask. the reason is inherently consumer expectation is they don't want to buy -- they like to buy modern equipment, an iphone, a tablet, things that do lots of different things. no consumer would want to pay for it. plus they're expensive. you have to install them, and you have to do all these complicated things. so the idea that you want to do this in the cloud is generally accepted as good, clean, progressive thinking. both from a consumer's perspective and investor's perspective and a technologist's perspective. so you have to bring practicality into the equation. the internet doesn't have sufficient bandwidth t

this is a rube goldberg type situation. if we can have something that buys orand rapidly sells, there is a risk-free advantage. that not evenric their own bosses can understand it let alone the head of the justice department or your congressman from middle america. moving from at is bloomberg to a radio show called full disclosure. it will debut at the end of the month. from sacramento. how does this affect the price of the transaction? guest: it really doesn't. this has helped individual investors. people used to think it was a great deal to pay a $30 commission. they are now paying three dollar commissions in large part because of the firms that come in. they are having to push down their costs. caller: good morning. i am very interested in the subject. student.ba this is extremely dangerous. it has outsourced the role of the floor trader. there are massive orders coming in on a computer line. outsourced has another sector of employees. they have replaced them by computerized trading. the ramifications of what this could

this is the sort of rube goldberg sort of contraption that only could be conceived of in washington, d.c. and you know, i can't -- i cannot make sense of why anyone would oppose trying to change this provision as we've done in this bill. some have speculated that it's a matter of saving face, right? you pass a big bill, pass it wickly, it perhaps was most ill advised and any sort of fundamental change to the bill, any sort of repeal of a major provision within the bill a replacement with something that works better, undermines the credibility not only of the bill itself but of those who supported it originally. i'd like to think better of my colleagues than that. i think there has to be something else at work here. but i don't know how to explain to that superintendent and those concerned school board members in washington county, indiana, why others won't sign on. mr. kelly: my homeschool district had has -- has had to implement procedures to keep its part-time employees working less than 30 hours. in new castle, a large county, they reduced all their part-time employees to 28 hours

this is a rube goldberg type situation. if we can have something that goes in and rapidly buys or sells, there is a risk-free advantage. it is so esoteric that not even their own bosses can understand it let alone the head of the justice department or your congressman from middle america. host: our guest is moving from a bloomberg to a radio show called full disclosure. it will debut at the end of the month. this is from sacramento. how does this affect the price of the transaction? guest: it really doesn't. this has helped individual investors. people used to think it was a great deal to pay a $30 commission. they are now paying three dollar commissions in large part because of the firms that come in. they are having to push down their costs. caller: good morning. i am very interested in the subject. i am an mba student. this is extremely dangerous. it has outsourced the role of the floor trader. there are massive orders coming in on a computer line. wall street has outsourced another sector of employees. they have replace

saying you can't allow this because it's simply a rube goldberg device is the phrase they've seized onareas basically kind of hacked the system found a loophole can allow this supreme court shut area down however the interesting part of the square gets big complicated on areas side are all the big silicon valley companies google and dropbox and services like that that say wait a minute these days consumers put all of their media in the cloud you might have a gene mail driver yes a driver drawbacks account and these places are are now i tunes account that's where we store our media so everyone's putting their media in there if you're playing your file and i'm playing a file that's the same one at the same time is not a public performance i rose it's complicated argument but that's what silicon valley is saying don't allow this don't like hollywood to get all up in the cloud innovation and if this happens then this could threaten the whole cloud so that's the other sky's fall and scenario given how the individual justices were responding to the arguments that were made what's your sense