but look at marco rubio. marco rubio is fun. rubio won the last time because he had weak opposition. he had tremendous money. and trump was very interested in having him come up. i mean, they needed to save that seat because they needed to save the senate. so everything was poured into that. but i'm not so sure he's going to make it the next time. it depends entirely on who the democrats put up. part of the problem is the democrats have not had many candidates. why? because the democratic party sucks in florida. kind of like the republican party in chicago and illinois. you always get a clown for the mayor because they don't have anybody. it's the same thing. >> well, you know, your point is absolutely well taken. i mean, the majority of cuban americans actually support the opening that we should have a different policy. but we have president trump. we have marco rubio. and so we have the policy, once again, captured. and, you know, it just keeps going cyclicly like this. and what happens then, it hurts the cuban people. >> i co

i agree with you that marco rubio has hijacked policy and that will never happen. in fact, it's a a sad time for cuba and everything i hear from my friends and people who are still there and traveling back and forth is that things are quite tough economically and that things are again quite scarce and also, the policies against the dissidents which under raul have been different a from the doubt. the dell ignored you until the slaughter you after you into jail for 30 years. raul wears you down and keeps arresting you are letting you go arresting you and letting go. that stuff wears back out of people and there is tremendous despair. especially again with the change of policy which happened under obama of the dry foot wet but that just does not allow people come. >> is there any time that people are talking about russia and china coming in for venezuela and is there hope on that or not and do you think that is something that that will do. >> likes china and he's always like china and i don't think they will -- cuba is an economic buckle. soviet union was pulling a m

esta vez fue con paulina rubio. ha sido un apoyo increÍble. paulina rubio: mi madre lo mÁs importante que la vida me ha dado. mi padre muriÓ en 2011. mi hijo acababa de nacer. fue muy duro. yo le estaba dando leche mi bebÉ, nadie me querÍa decir. momentos muy difÍciles dentro de una familia como en cualquier lado. es algo que todavÍa no me recupero. >>quÉ has aprendido de la vida? paulina rubio: he aprendido a quedarme, a veces, callada. es muy difÍcil. a veces, te tienes que retirar y volver con mÁs fuerza. hay que aprender a perdonar. todavÍa sigo en ese proceso. >>es muy difÍcil perdonar? paulina rubio: depende de quÉ te hagan. [risas] depende del tiempo que uno se tiene que tomar para reflexionar y trabajar en uno para que no te vuelva a pasar. >> de quÉ te has arrepentido? paulina rubio: yo me arrepiento de lo que no hago, de lo que hago aprendo. me arrepiento de lo que no hago. [risas] yo amo a los padres de mis hijos, amo a mis hijos. ♪ >>hoy estÁs con el padre de tu hijo? paulina rubio: eso no te lo voy a co

thank you. ♪ [applause] >> thank you, senator rubio. next speaker, we are so excited to have him, is a fifth-generation wisconsin native who came to washington in the early 1990's as an aid to jack kemp at a conservative public policy organization called empower america. nativerned to his wisconsin and was elected to congress in 1998. from the minute he arrived in congress he was an impact player. he rose to be chairman of the house budget committee, and chairman of the house ways and means committee. from those posts, he provided leadership that pointed true policies thating create jobs and economic opportunity for every american, sanity andfiscal discipline in washington, d.c. in 2012 he was the republican nominee for vice president and in 2015 he was elected by his colleagues as speaker of the house. thepeaker, he helped as most sweeping and a deep tax cuts since the reagan era. the abortion pass act to put an end to late-term abortions and united states -- in the united states. [applause] he asked the repeat -- past the repeal of --

i will never forget when i first found out about marco rubio, i got a call. i was in my office one day in 2009 and i got a call from representative david -- the head of the christian coalition of florida and he said ralph i have with guy that i served with in the statehouse who was the speaker. i served under him and he is now running for the u.s. senate and i think he's going to win. i want you to meet him and i wanted to help him. i said he is running against charlie crist who is the incumbent governor who has $6 million who has been endorsed by the entire republican leadership in the u.s. senate. i said i'm sorry but this looks like a wing and a prayer to me. he said i just want you to come down here and i want you to meet him. i came down to speak to a republican women's group in orlando and marco was speaking that morning. i got up and sat in the back of the room and i can tell you i have sized up an awful lot of political people in that this man had a greater level of authenticity, knew who he was, knew whose he was and knew why he was running in just a

marco rubio said you have to do more on human rights. the president answered a few questions, we talked about it, we didn't go into detail. >> it is true that american leaders and presidents have dealt with really bad people in the past. and that is an unfortunate undercurrent of diplomacy sometimes. that said, he did take it to another level. he talked about how much kim's people loved him. it is amazing how hard you'll cheer for someone when you don't want your family to end up in a gulag. so it really is -- he took it a step further than he needed to. one thing to butter someone up, another thing to take it to the next level, which the president seemed to. >> jackie kucinich, max boot, nice to have you both, thank you very much. >>> moments ago, we heard from mitch mcconnell on the floor of the senate, congratulating president trump on this summit with kim jong-un. he says the u.s. and its allies must be ready to act if north korea does not follow through on the framework laid out here. how are other members of congress reacting? we'l

now, before moving on on this, i want to take a moment to thank senators cotton and rubio for working with senator van hollen, myself, and the rest of us on this issue. my friends on the other side of the aisle, it's harder for them to oppose the president than it is for us. my friends on the other side of the aisle have had the courage of their convictions to not only speak out but to support this legislation despite the opposition of their party's president. it's rare indeed when schumer, van hollen, rubio, and cotton issue a joint statement, on this issue, we all agree. it's an issue that transcends party and concerns the vital national security interests of this great united states of america. so i'm very glad for the sake of the country we were able to come together and pass this amendment. finally, mr. president, on health -- madam president, on health care. today we expect the trump administration to issue a new rule that would expand junk insurance plans that don't cover critical conditions and are far from comprehensive health coverage. these plans may not include coverage fo

what is the -- what is the -- >> so this tag represents the amount of money that marco rubio, our senatorn florida, has taken from the nra, divided by every student in the state which is $1.05. and what the nra does is a lot of the time they'll block common sense gun laws like universal background checks that 97% of the country supports. bumy: sh, you guys. i got - you got to walk me through how we ended up getting here. i hate to talk about it.

i get marco rubio's position.t puppets now in donald trump's party. it is the trump era. marco rubio stands up to him. it is the trump era. >> this is wishful thinking on marco rubio's part. this is president trump's party. john boehner is completely right not only on tariffs and immigration. think about one of the central pillars was the national debt which tops $20 trillion. the deficit will reach highest levels that it has been in almost a decade because of tax overhaul and spending. the president wants to spend more on infrastructure. the rhetoric in the republican party which used to be focussed on compassionate conserveativism like paul ryan liked to talk about all the time. now we have divisive politics. he has no doubt changed this party and made it his own. >> steve bannon, listen to him talking to fareed zakaria about how he views the stakes. >> trump's second presidential race will be on november 6 this year. we will have up or down vote. do you back trump's program or do you back removing him? because

we will hear from marco rubio and house speaker paul ryan. >> i am so privileged and honored to welcomeur next feature. , when iever forget first found out about marco rubio, i got a call, i was in my office one day in 2009 and i got a call from representative david baxley, the former head of the christian coalition in florida. i have a guyh, that i served in with the statehouse was speaker, i served under him and he is now running for the u.s. senate and i think he is going to win and i want you to meet him and help him. i said, dennis, he is running against charlie crist.

we talked, howie did and we reference senator rubio. he said "i too have concerns about how this will turn out but i don't recall the experts criticizing obama when he met with the brutal dictator in cuba who oversaw a police state and killed in jail his opponents. #doublestandard. >> hs thoughtful on these issues, spent significant amount of time on it but i think the president gave up nothing. he could have pushed the pause button on some of these military exercises but we only do two a year. we did one in the spring. this one, for months to come. it would be easy to put that on. i think the president is giving up nothing. we've shown is that maximum pressure works. tough talk by the president works. we are in much better shape today than we were a big day president trump took office with regard to international security and focus specifically. we know nuclear weapons in the hands of north korea makes the world ss safe d less stable and less secure. >> shannon: just about everyone agrees this is a first step and there's more to come.

. >> david simon the cre cor of the hit hbome show the wire slammed florida senator marco rubio for a tweets he sent out after the shooting.mm simoning rubio for suggng was part to blame for the shooting rubioeted i'm not>>rting.we it's terrible for country. lack of trust in vulnerable to ttoavvenefas. we arellblfois mess. sorry, that includes many i media. >> simon responded by enying theator is unfit to be a citizen. at this hour rubio stillt has no tweeted hisiv condolences for tes lost in yesterday's tragic event. >> representative maxine waters canled her upcoming events in abama and texas this weekend because ofriome ous death threats. >> comes after waters called on people to protest members of the trump administration in public over their support for the president's zer tolerance immigration policy. waters says individuals have threatened to shoot lynch or cause her serious bodily harm. >> nearly 600 people arresd protesting theru tmp immigrants. they're being chargedla with unul demonstration. now, among those arrestedn washington state.pully from more events are planned this

one thing we heard, for example, from senator marco rubio is detain families together. come up with family detention centers like we saw in some cases in the obama administration. don't separate families while they are awaiting their hearing,

and it makes you -- it gives you a leg up on the marco rubios of the world. because you don't care what comes next. it's not just the means. it's an end. reons why i think a lot of he other speakers so quickly realized i can't sound like trump because the problem with trump speaking style is it gets in the way of his agenda. but if the agenda is in the way of people paying attention to you, then i think you can speak like that. and so -- and the other thing i think we're noticing is the backlash to a type ofspeaker. it's happening so quickly. everything -- the new cycle is now a few seconds long and so on that people went from extemporaneous is grea off the cuff is trump. maybe i want to sound like trump. we're so over that, now i want to sound more scripted and total and now i want to be in opposition of that. >> anotherquestion. the lady there in the black. just wait for the microphone. >> i just wanted to ask do you think president trump has -- will have a lasting effect on how presidents communicate? or is it unique to him? or has he changed t landscape,

>> marco rubio pretty much refuses to talk to me. in fact, that's part of the reason i'm wearing this price tag right now which says $1.05. the reasoning behind that, that's the amount of money that marco rubio has taken from the nra divided by every tunt stude our state. many have been willing to sat down and talk with us such as senator jeff flake and murkowski. they've been willing to listen unlike marco rubio in florida. bill nelson h just simply ask how you can help. >> what are you going to tell your voters? you're 18. voters in florida, for example, in the weeks and months ahead before november. >> i'm going to tell them, look, it doesn't matter if they're a democrat or republican. just do your research into who their special interests are and ask yourself do you want those special interests to be governing you? at the end of the day, right now it's not our politicians that are governing us. it's the corporate special interests that get them elected that are. that's what allows these things to continue. and why what happened a

you mentioned marco rubio. think politically he is a very good politician who is sort of a baseball analogy using. only oneump really has mode, but he is good at it. i would say that when he speaks it is not exactly like standup comedy. standup comedy is not usually as extemporaneous as it seems. and some of the art is in concealing the art. watching someone who is very good at getting the attention of the crowd, and i think most leaders, most political leaders, regardless of their party, are trying to get your attention for some reason. and it is an incredibly powerful thing when you're trying to get someone as it should, and that is the reason, it gives you a leg up on the marco rubios of the world. you don't care what comes next. it is not just the means, it is an end. that is one of the reasons why i think a lot of the speakers so quickly realized i can't sound like trump because the problem with his speaking style is that it gets in the way of an agenda. but if the agenda is getting people to pay attention

rubio andators warner have talked about super majorities that could overridtrh zte.you think the house would also nullify it? greg: people need to get educated on what that zte of the future would look like and what kind of controls and safeguards are there to prevent bad actors from doing bad things to the american public. first of all, i think we have to start with that. i don't think most members have been briefed on this yet. i'm not saying anything about senators, some on the intelligence committee. i'm not. i've had a number of briefings. if they get it right, then i think president trump should be given the benefit of the doubt here. i believe he is standing up for the best interests of our country when he is going down these paths. emily: all right. representative greg walden of oregon, thank you so much for weighing in. switching gears now to ride-hailing. last month, a european ridesharing company surpassed caroline hyde caught up with the ceo earlier and asked what they plan to do with the money. >> we are investing heavily into the technology in the ride-

we talk about the media bias and reference marco rubio, this is another his tweets, i too have concerns how this will turn out izing obama when he went to the brutal dictator in cuba who oversaw a police state and killed in jail his opponents. >> we worked closely together on the foreign relations committee, he is very thoughtful on all the issues, significant amount of time on it, the president gave up nothing, pushed the positive button on military exercises but only two a year, we have done the one in the spring, this one isn't for months to come so it would be easy to put those back on. we have a lot of what we have shown, the maximum pressure wos, tough talk by the president works. we are in better shape today than we were the day donald trump took office with regard to all these issues of international security and focus specifically because we know nuclear weapons in the hands of e of north korea specifically kim jong un makes the world less safe and less stable and less secure. shannon: there is much more to come. thank you for coming in tonight. breaking tonight you heard linds

jeb bush or would marco rubio have supported higher tariffs?ould they have been on a jihad as you yankees say in new york city for destroying free trade. >> no, sir. >> okay. what about the tpp, hey, would marco rubio or jeb bush turn china over -- >> i think noah is uncomfortable. >> over to the chinese? >> no, i wouldn't. >> no, you wouldn't. what about white supremacy, would jeb bush or marco rubio after charlottesville, preached more equivalency -- >> can i have a water? >> white supremacy? no, of course they wouldn't. what about russia. i'm trying to figure out exactly how jeb bush would have tailored his speech for marco rubio that russia should be in the g8 and justin trudeau should go sit in a corner with a dunce cap. >> no. >> what about north korea, do you think jeb bush or marco rubio would go to north korea and say that kim jong-un was a nice man. >> talented. >> that nuclear weapons were forever banned from north korea? >> funny guy. >> and a funny guy. would they ever say that? >> they might say he's fawny guy. very charitable her

i will never forget when i first sent out about marco rubio. i got a call. was in my office one day in 2009 and i got a call from representative david baxley who was a former head of the christian coalition in florida and he said, ralph, i've got a guy that i served in with the statehouse who was speaker. i served under him and he's not running for the use senate and a think is going to win i do want you to meeting and i want you to help them. and i said, dennis m he's running against charlie crist who is the incumbent governor who has $6 million, who's been endorsed by the entire republican leadership in the u.s. senate. i said, i'm sorry but this looks like a wing and a prayer to me. and he said i just want you to come down here and want you to meet him. and i came down to speak to a republican women's group in orlando, and marco was speaking that morning. i got up and sat in the back of the room, and i can tell you i have sidestepped an awful lot of political horse collection in my career, that this man had a greater level of authenticity, knew who he was

we have this from sender marco rubio. >> rubio has been repeating the same line.t is a nice and easy thing to say that you will put compliance officers into the company, but zte is a massive company. there are still a lot of questions about whether they will be able to clamp down on the security concerns. what this whole thing shows is that the fear of lawmakers extends beyond the singular company. it is a question of technological dominance. china wants to be dominant. they will continue the ip staff and they forced licensing agreement. this will situation has done nothing to stop these -- the situation has done nothing to stop the greater issues. mily: what about the concerns with the chinese government? there have been discussions about disagreements with chinese phone manufacturers. several years ago, there were tons of u.s. companies striking deals with hardware makers so it get their ownld software on various phone devices. we are seeing that lawmakers are responding to what facebook said. they are asking twitter, google, what agreements did you have with th

marco rubio come to his credit speak up. to be candid i don't know about what know about florida politics but it is not rubio country this is a liberal part of florida so marco rubio showing up two weeks before qowtd have been in that room -- but he knew what he was getting into and and i admire that he wept there and governor scott did not go and president trump did not go and republican leaders of the state senate and state house didn't go even though they were all invited so rubio was only republican official there and people were angry. and you know, i -- i -- took heat for not stopping i took heat for not stopping students or parents when they went after dane that or anyone else but the truth is i wasn't going to say -- some dad who lost his 14-year-old daughter you need a little more respect for the senator. hest lo his daughter. physician you dengt like it turn it off. >> what i admired was your restraint. you -- you held become and let them tack. let them vengt. it was we all fancy ourselves as speaking truth to powe

senator marco rubio coming up live.he started a landscape business. someone stole all his equipment. something else happened that will make you even more proud to be an american ♪ steve: our troop services is a veterans owned operating business down in oklahoma. last month the business suffered devastating loss when all of their equipment was stolen. last week they got the gift of a lifetime when a nonprofit group soldier's wish donated $15,000 of new equipment and the next guest says it saved the company. owner of troop services joins us from tulsa today. somebody stole all your stuff and somebody came to your rescue. tell us the story. >> yes, sir. good morning. thank you for having me i work with our troop services. all of our equipment got stolen. we do mowing, fencing and build decks. all of our equipment got stolen. i walked into the consignment store that we also operate, our troops consignment. every morning i would walk to the back and check our equipment. walked in one morning and it was gone on sunday morning

>> marco rubio pretty much refuses to talk to me.t's part of the reason why i'm wearing this price tag which says $1.05. the reasoning behind that is that's the amount of money marco rubio has taken from the nra divided by every student in our state. many lawmakers have been willing to sit down and talk with us, such as senator jeff flake and murkowski. they have actually been willing to listen, up like my senator, marco rubio, in florida. but bill nelson has been able to sit down with us multiple times and asked how he can help. that's the best thing people can do, simply ask how you can help. >> what are you going to tell your voters, and you're a voter, you're 18, voters in florida in the weeks and months ahead before november? >> i'm going to tell them, look, it doesn't matter if they're a democrat or republican, just do their research into who their special interests are. ask yourself do you want those special interests to be governing you? at the end of the day, it's the corporate special interests that get them elected that ar

senator rubio saying, "why didn't facebook group reveal this months ago?"is more concerning about the fact that these are chinese telecom companies that are already under scrutiny by the u.s. government? greg: i think that's the heart of the matter here, specifically. it's twofold. one is the alleged past practices or current practices of some of these companies is troubling. that's why there are these discussions in national security settings. beyond that, why wouldn't you tell us? it's a pretty big question, but a pretty easy question. why wouldn't you fully disclose? they should have. this gets back to why i think silicon valley would be well served by ceo's, other than when they are in a crisis situation like facebook is now, to come and share with us in congress what their strategies are, what their agreements are, what their recommendations are. that's why i've invited them to do that before my committee, and so far we don't have any takers voluntarily, but we benefit from their presence. emily: are you going to demand that mark zuckerberg come back?

senator kennedy, you are first followed by senator rubio. senator kennedy: madam secretary, welcome. if you add up all state local, , and federal dollars, we spend to 12, my understanding is we spend on average in the united states about $13,000 per public school student. does that sound about right? secretary devos: that does. senator kennedy: i also understand we rank about the same as slovakia, which spends about half the money. is that right? secretary devos: i think that would be about right. senator kennedy: name the one single thing that congress could do in your considered judgment to improve elementary and secondary education on the public side in america. secretary devos: the one single thing that congress -- senator kennedy: the most important. secretary devos: that would be to empower parents to especially low income parents to find and choose the right education setting for their child. on the one hand. and to really embrace and support individual local public schools to be creative and innovative with how they meet their studen

and then on the -- [speaking spanish] >> as you can hear, there were a handful of hecklers heckling rubiosenator says that he does support keeping them together but he is skeptical of that right now due to the numbers crossing in that we can do that. back to you, ed. . >> ed: phil keating, thanks very much. as we wait for the president's remarks on immigration, i'm joined by a.b. stoddard from real clear politics. good to see you. >> thanks for having me, ed. >> ed: there's mixed signals from the president when he demands that congress does something on immigration. then he says never mind. we'll wait to the mid-terms. what about the frustration of the president that congress can't get off the dime? he have republicans running the house. the senate is more complicated. but a.b., he's been pushing and pushing. barack obama was pushing before that and they're not getting anything done. >> right. the truth is, he can tweet about how much republicans need to elect more members to have more votes but they have the votes. they're in the majority. the division is within their own ranks. the peop

you sat down with senator marco rubio. here is what he said about people crossing the border. watch this. >> yes, there are people who cross the border who are dangerous and criminals and the like. i would say through my experience the vast majority of people are coming over because they just want a better life. my sense of it is if you're a father, for example my situation, my family is desperate, living in a dangerous situation, i would do almost anything to protect my children and find a better life for them. we have to understand that. that doesn't mean we don't have to have laws on our end. mexico has immigration laws and canada has immigration laws. i don't think we should generalize that. i think the vast majority of people crossing the border want something better. >> he's describing people crossing the border differently than the president is. >> marco rubio was very careful in that interview. he was trying to navigate this. he is a son of immigrants. he understands the story. he understands the yearning for something better for your children. so that's where he got o

nikki haley and tim scott endorsed marco rubio, two people both in the mid-80s in the polling.ular governor, mitt romney and newt gingrich beat him. with that being said, when you land air force one in a state like south carolina, the day before a primary, a runoff primary, it tells every one of your supporters to go vote. it is invaluable what will happen. now, the message that the president is going to deliver tonight, we're not sure what that is. that could be illegal immigration. it could be taxes. it could be a sundry of things that comes out. i don't think any of that will hurt governor mcmaster. all of it will be to his benefit. >> you said the president's high approval rating is because of its -- his policy. not because of his personality. it is not because of the rhetoric. you bring up emigration. if he talks about immigration tonight, as you know, it has been hard for many republicans to stomach the separation of families at the border and some of his staunchest supporters called him out on that. how do you think he plays that? >> well, poppy, i remember the quality c

. >> with all due respect the only person talking about a solution to this is marco rubio.e have not done -- we have kmeetly kmeetly -- completely ignored. >> we came two votes short of a motion to discharge to put a bill on the floor next week that we collectively can do to make a difference and change it. so people are working on it now. >> i'm talking about foreign policy with respect to our involvement in honduras. >> i was born in nicaragua. >> if you want to solve the problem let's solve the problem. >> people are desperate to get out there. that has happened in the last six weeks. there is a foreign policy component and also an immigration policy. it is not either/or. i say to my senator marco rubio you should be on dianne feinstein's bill where there are 43 democrats. >> that stops the separation policy. >> marco rubio these are kids that look like us, sound like us. their parents are doing what our parents did, flee economic distress to have their children to be able to give them a better life. and it is horrible to me that he is instead tweeting about kanye west's

. >> robbie, let me ask you about senator marco rubio, republican of florida, who writes this, quote, releasing those who unlawfully enter because they came with children creates a cruel incentive to bring children on this dangerous journey. now, some of the data, you know, doesn't bear that out, but that is the counterargument, robbie, that if you just continue with catch and release, as in the previous administration, you endanger these children as well. does he have a point and what should democrats do? what is it incumbent on democrats to do at this point? >> well, democrats are caught in a trap where we're having to spend all of our time talking about something that is totally immoral and outrageous and never should have happened in the first place, rather than focusing on the big issue here, we have an immigration crisis in that we don't have a sensible system. the illegal immigration has slowed, illegal border crossings have slowed. you notice the language used, this type of immigration increased. scott said this, there is a crisis in central america where people are literally

the two-party produced rubio -- the tea party produced rubio and cruz. he is a good demagogue and i use that term in the most technical sense. he was willing to say things and do things the other candidates weren't willing to do. they were right not to be willing to do those -- the racist --, mexican rapists. they did things that were more successful i expected, which the republican electorate more more exasperated and were angrier than i expected. and whether they are right or wrong, it was american 2016 such horrible minor. was it the worst governed to country in the history of the world? was it worse than years ago? i'm not so sure. but that was the attitude trump tapped into it in a way that really no one had from either party, no one had and succeeded. people like buchanan had. and that was a big deal. me why do you talk trump, let's get the on trump, but it's a big deal of u.s. presidents. he is changing or maybe changing our norms and trump procedures e way we think of politics and civil discourse and the presidency in ways that i don't think are

senator rubio: do we know how many haven't been -- have been investigated for violations? secretary devos: i don't have that number now but i can get that to your office. senator rubio: my last question thislearly the intent of cool discipline guidance issued under the previous administration could not have been meant to prevent teachers from reporting a student to law enforcement when the student commits an act that may result in them being prohibitive from legally purchasing a firearm. that was the intent -- that was not the intent of the policy. i hope to encourage you to be supportive of it, to issue a first impression. i am not sure, we might have shared it with your office already, but it is legislation that i have introduced called abcs and school discipline, and moved it -- it would provide clear guidance on this, that the discipline policy of our school districts should in no way prevent teachers from reporting a student to law enforcement when the student commits an act that may result in them being prohibited from legally purchasing a firearm later on for obviou

here's what marco rubio said on twitter about the democrats. based on senate speeches, democratic position is don't detain children, don't detain their parents, either, so we don't separate families and don't deport them if they fail to appear for subsequent hearings. so basically if you enter unlawfully with children, we won't enforce the law. this sounds like maybe a hard line position, but it's actually not rkts a not, and coming from marco rubio, it's really not, so are the democrats painting themselves into a position that allows for the republicans to get political advantage? >> yeah, you have some republicans taking it too far and basically saying democrats are for open borders. the president saying the democrats supported ms-13. those kinds of lines and attack of argument are absurd. but this idea of what do democrats actually stand for in terms of immigration reform in handling this problem at the border in terms of these specific issues with folks coming over the border with kids? what do they want to do? you haven't heard a lot in te

marco rubio, he doesn't want a deal. >> he might if they're going to pay the u.s. a billion dollars. >> i don't think it's about the money. it's about not trusting zte and the technology and the fears of what zte is doing here. a billion dollars doesn't solve marco rubio's problems. >> was zte cut off in bringing that company to the knees. they reached out to trump to work something out. it appears they have. however, paying a relatively modest fine and letting them go about their business is something that's going to be deeply upsetting, not only to democrats in congress but to republicans who are considering passing some kind of legislation to try and block this. i think a lot of people on capitol hill will be very unhappy to hear that this is the settlement that the trump administration is worked out. >> it's not just -- it's not money, it's not just money. it probably isn't money at all. it's been intellectual property. it's about them stealing american secrets and technology -- >> but it's also about sanctions. >> it's cutting a deal with zte before you might

he attacked hillary clinton, ted cruz, marco rubio when they were trump's rival. but i don't see what the crime is in any of this. all of this, it is true, is perhaps unsavory -- >> for michael cohen to be shaping coverage of the "national enquirer" to favor his client donald trump? >> it is certainly not how journalism is supposed to work, but i don't see that as a crime. now, the one issue possibly is was there some sort of unlawful campaign contribution. >> what about -- >> but again, what is the crime. they never ran the story. is that a campaign contribution? maybe. but again, it is really weird and distasteful and not how we imagine journalism should work. but whether there is a crime there is something that nobody has been charged with. >> and the journal reporter was subpoenaed this week. so apparently the company is cooperating. so if there was something, we'll find out. >> maybe tom arnold needs to get on it. >> absolutely. get him on the case. >> thank you guys so much. watch brian on reliable sources every sunday morning. >>> just ahead, more than 4,00

we spoke to senator rubio recently about that.view of the scale of the theft and tell us your solution. >> it's so massive. it's like a game of whack-a-mole to keep up with it. they use tools, the straight out theft or the companies doing business in china. you are required to partner with a chinese company. then they make you give them the technology. once they figure out how to do it themselves because they took it from you, they kick you out. they don't need you anymore. they come to the u.s. they embed students in the universities for the purposes of stealing information or bringing it back or they come out to hire american researchers and pay them four times as much to take the research they are doing. often times paid by the american taxpayers at the ground level to start it and take it over there to them. i could go on and on for hours but it's a constant, massive, unprecedented effort to transfer the intellectual wealth of this country to surpass us. >> tucker: it's not clear to me why so few in the congress, in the senate

. >> what we heard from marco rubio. he knows better than anybody when you try to play trump's game, it backfires on you. michael, he was very clear about that. recently as well. >> right. and we remember it was the hand reference that marco rubio tried to use against candidate trump and it went absolutely nowhere. look, it's not as if the democratic party as an institution put these events in motion. it was a restauranteur in rural virginia who started the very recent cycle and i think there is a consensus that it was wrong for sarah huckabee sanders to be asked to leave that restaurant. i base that largely anecdotically on what i heard from radio listeners on what i heard across the country yesterday. the question becomes, okay, what are the party officials then going to do with those facts and i think that maxine waters really did throw gas on this fire, make it a heck of a lot worse. the president's response to with waters is a bit of a roarshack test. was he saying maxine, be careful what you wish for because you mi

i'm bringing this up because rubio is in the middle of this immigration debate for some time. >> first of all, i was hoping you were bringing it up to encourage people to watch the show. >> there's also that. watch "the axe files." >> you know, rubio is very interesting because there was a time when he was a leader on the immigration reform issue. you'll remember he walked away from it in 2013 because he got such blowback from the conservative wing, the anti-immigration wing of the party. but even so, you could see -- you know, he's an immigrant himself from cuba. his family is an immigrant family, he's a first generation immigrant. he really pulled back from the president's characterization of immigrants, which is really -- >> i think we have a clip of it. >> depicted the people who are coming as dangerous. he said they're not sending us their best, rapists and murderers. >> not based on a lottery or not people that snuck across the border. and they could be murderers and thieves and so much else. >> the vast -- 98%, 99% of these people are being charged with a misdemeanor, t

you're big point with senator rubio is well taken.the chinese are spying on us and they're doing it through technology and we need to do something about it. >> sandra: you can tell he feels passionately about that. we'll see where it goes. >> bill: and we're inside the department of justice on the hillary clinton e-mail matter and what it will say about loretta lynch and others. >> sandra: and awaiting a house gop leadership amidst a busy week. we'll bring it live when it begins. from the first moment you met, it was love at first touch. and all you wanted to do was surround them in comfort and protection. that's why only pampers swaddlers is the number one choice of hospitals to wrap your baby in blanket-like softness and premium protection. so that all they feel is love. pampers the number one choice of hospitals, nurses and parents >> bill: you should see what the commercials are like out here. get a handle on that. what will the watchdog probing agency bring us about the report tomorrow. jason chaffetz and bri harth. welcome, guys

really outhas been front with senator rubio on this.hile they've said there's concern, when you get into the specifics here and go to these local districts that are republican strongholds, their supply chains inflected -- impacted by qualcomm, these are jobs. when i talk to the folks who work with zte, they say they have not been able to make the toe that they are trying suggest these supply chains that rely on zte will be significantly impacted. jinping directly asked president trump to do this. this is a sign of goodwill from their perspective in the negotiation bilaterally between u.s. and china. i cannot find one republican who can see what the ministration got back -- administration got back. the president believes the commerce department ultimately has the final say the matter what. members ofcally, congress boat with what will get them reelected. will this be an issue at all? >> i doubt it. the atmospherics around the trump administration are clearly top of mind for us journalists. when it gets down to local elections, it's usual

we saw marco rubio, after the bill was passed, saying he welcomed the passage, that it protected american in the economy from the chinese government's efforts to use telecommunications company for espionage. a lot moving on the china us trade front. basically, the trump administration makes its concession and is now shut down by the senate. how will the lower halves vote on this arrangement? that is to be seen. lower house has a different defence bill which will have to be reconciled. reports here say there have —— there has been an effort. that was not successful. it is to try to convince the lower house to block this bill, keeping the deal between the trump administration and the white house and zte alive. it's reported that trump will try to convince republicans to support the zte deal. even if it passes, it doesn't mean lights for zte. zte deal. even if it passes, it doesn't mean lights for zt e. while president trump is hoping the deal can still be revived, it also threatened to impose an additional 10% tariff on $200 billion worth of chinese goods. let's get more on this. this raise

shareholders, but to the chinese communist party and chinese government," senator mark warner and marco rubioetter to trump. for fans of football, there's no better time than the world cup. you get together with friends and family and watch top—class matches. in asia, that means sometimes staying up till the early hours of the morning, watching and munching on your favorite snacks. in china, the hot nibbles this year, are yabo, or what in english we'd call duck necks. stephen mcdonell has more. china like many other countries, is in the grip of football fever. here, that means a festival of sport, ears, and... duck necks. —— beer. all over beijing, just like other chinese cities, these good delivery drivers can be seen in big numbers rushing around the streets. this family has kindly allowed us to watch the game with them. come and meet them. so, we have got our beverages, we have got out duck necks, and we have got our football! enjoying the world cup action. that's it for business briefing this hour. but before we go, here are the markets. and on the markets... up next — newsbriefing. we'll

. >> senator marco rubio. >>. >> obviously there's a great deal of interest on the upcoming summit with the north korean, we have secretary pompeo here who will take remarks on that topic. the president has agreed on a press conference today. >> .. and ballistic missile programs. these programs threaten our homeland our allies and partners and the broader nonproliferation regime. north korea's path ken made -- to make what is the proliferation to other actors that creates in addition to the primary risks. it has supporting infrastructure that is also a concern. in early 2017 the trump administration decided on a policy we have referred to as the maximum pressure campaign to the campaign enacted the strongest economic and diplomatic sanctions against north korea in history. the goal was to set the conditions for the dprk to make a strategic decision to denuclearize as the best means by which will achieve its own security. american leadership rally the international community and send a strong message to senator kim jong-un and the world that we will not stand for the dprk illegal weapons

rubio talked with david axelrod for tomorrow night's episodes of "the ax files." people are being charged with a m.d., they don't have criminal histories. is it fair to depict them that way? >> i don't think it's wise to cast a broad net of generalization over any group of human beings. so yes there are people that cross the boarder that are dangerous and criminals and the like. i would say through my experience the vast majority of people are coming over because they want a better life. and my sense of it is if you're a father, for example, my situation, my family is desperate. they're living in a dangerous situation, i'd do almost anything to protect my children and find a better life for them. so we have to understand that element of it. that doesn't mean we have to have laws on our end. >> don't miss more of the interview tomorrow night at 7:00 on "the axe files." again, 7:00 tomorrow night. on sunday, join me as well as david axelrod, karl rove, glenn clo close, robin william's son jack for a really important conversation. all of us have been touched by suici

senator rubio saying, "why didn't facebook just reveal this ?"ago saying not to compare this to samsung. what is more concerning about the fact that these are chinese telecom companies that are already under scrutiny by the u.s. government? greg: i think that's the heart of the matter here, specifically. it's twofold. one is the alleged past practices or current practices of some of these companies is troubling. that's why there are these discussions in national security settings. beyond that, why wouldn't you tell us? it's a pretty big question, but a pretty easy question. why wouldn't you fully disclose? you should they should have. , this gets back to why i think silicon valley would be well served by ceo's, other than when they are in a crisis situation like facebook is now, to come and share with us in congress what their strategies are, what their agreements are, what their recommendations are. that's why i've invited them to do that before my committee, and so far we don't have any takers voluntarily, but we benefit from their presence. em