the question is directed mostly to jim gould but picks up on the last comment made by rudy petre --penn --penner. if the package is less than the one$.2 trillion the unqualified for the fast-track procedures and the rest of the process works as it is in the statute and the difference is made up at the back end through a sequester? >> that is my reading. there is nothing in the statute saying that is in the budget control act to say that that bill would not qualify. basically it anticipates that possibility because the sequesters the dust on a bill that doesn't meet -- it is partly their. that is to be fully protected. yes. >> while we are waiting for another question could i address something rudy said at the end? the estimates we worked on that you are familiar with is if we do not succeed, if they get nothing, if they fail you are looking at a 10% across-the-board cuts in defense in one year for each year thereafter and you are looking at 8% to 9% across-the-board cuts in discretionary programs or non defense programs and a number of programs are exempt from that. the means for low in