and it sounds like, miss ruga ruggles, in the department of public health, they're in agreement with you at this time. we'll take public comment. anyone wishing to speak, come up. >> this is a good program. it helps families, and it helps children, but i want to point out to you that the success of this program could be a lot higher and more beneficial to everybody involved if you provided housing for the people who you're trying to treat. you set the income requirements for families of low-income and very low-income back at people where they can get permanent housing and not recycle in and out of your shelter systems and these navigation systems where they have permanent housing accommodation with their disabilities and the treatment of their behavior situations, which is a negative impact, and their impact in their lives would be easier to manage if you had permanent housing. you set the requirement at the a.m. i. at a requirement equal to their income where they have opportunity to apply to be a tenant, and all the apartment buildings that's being built in san francisco, you have