however, that's not part of the rulemaking. it's really the one-way set-top box rulemaking that we have from the commission that's talking about gateway dices and these vague -- devices and these vague standards which would impose hundreds of millions be not billions of dollars. and we think it's time for chairman wheeler to embrace the issues that we as an industry and something he encouraged at the beginning of his chairmanship where he said i hope i can have industry collaboration. we're here to collaborate if the fcc would just listen. >> bob, who's your competition? >> guest: wow. today, directv, dish network, a little bit of time warner as well as at&t u-verse in a fairly large portion of my service area. we also have centurylink and frontier as internet be and phone competitors and, of course, at&t also fits into that. we have some, i guess, some larger backbone type providers for truly big pipe internet be as well. >> host: what about the chrome tvs, the apple tvs, the rokus, the netflix? do you consider them competitio

-- the first rulemaking effort we had.the rulemaking is in place. whether it solves all the ongoing abuses. may or mat now have. we'll take enforcement action. if you're aware of abuses that are specific that we should know about, we will follow up with you and be glad to hear what they are so we can consider whether to investigate them. but i do think it's quite possible our rulemaking hasn't solved every problem in the marketplace, and to the extent it hasn't we went to pursue funds in the marketplacey. i forthgot the third part of you question. >> does your rulemaking address and does your enforcement and tracking address what seems to be massive use of this money transfer opportunity for folks being in and working in the country illegally and sending money sure seas. >> our rulemaking does that address that. congress did not direct us to address that and that is for other parts of the federal government, not for us. >> you don't track that activity. >> i don't believe we do, no. >> would the same apply if we were talki

a numeral -- a new rulemaking. as anith that, we industry have come to the commission and said, we have other proposals we would like you to consider in addition to the set-top box proposal. however, that is not part of the rulemaking. it is really the one way set-top box rulemaking they are talking about. they would impose hundreds of millions of dollars. we think it is time for chairman to embrace the issues that we have brought together. said i hope we have industry collaboration. we are here to collaborate, if they listen. peter: who is your competition? in theday my competition television market, dish network, .irectv, time warner, and at&t we also have centurylink and frontier as internet and phone competitors. at&t also fixes -- fits in. we have some larger backbone type providers for big pipe internet. peter: what about chrome tv, apple tv, roku, netflix? are they competition? bob: i consider them come in entary.- complim i want to make a great broadband products that consumers know they can use. i try to m

the rulemaking is in place. whether it's solved the ongoing abuses it may or may not have but we will take actions as needed against the industry if we find abuses. if you are aware of abuses or hearing about abuses that we should know about we will follow-up with you and be glad to hear what they are so we can consider whether to investigate them. i think it is possible our rulemaking has not solved every problem in the marketplace. and extent hasn't, we want to continue to pursue problems in the marketplace. i forgot the third part of your question. senator vitter: related to that was, does your rulemaking address and does your enforcement and tracking address what seems to be massive use of this money transfer opportunity for folks being in and working in the country illegally and sending money overseas? mr. cordray: our rulemaking does not address that. congress did not direct us to address that. senator vitter: so you do not track any of that activity? mr. cordray: i don't believe we do. senator vitter: wou

move quickly to complete your rulemaking on payday loans. you are the best hope for millions of american families to avoid these debt traps in a future. thank you for your work. >> thank you, mr. chairman. good morning, director cordray. not too much longer and it will be good afternoon. mr. cordray: i was wondering myself. rounds: in a recent speech, you discussed your philosophy on consent orders. you had said, and i will briefly lay this out, our public enforcement actions have been marked by orders in which specify the facts and the resulting legal conclusions. these orders provide detailed guidance for compliance officers across the marketplace about how they should regard similar practices at their own institutions. what i want to talk about a little bit, and my concern is is that the consent orders without a finding, or even an admission of guilt, the allied settlement is an example of that, could mean little more than a company's business to settle a lawsuit with minimal expense. my question is, do you agree for compliance officers t

the rulemaking is in place. whether it softed all the ongoing -- solved all the ongoing abuses, it may or may not have. we will take enforcement actions as necessary if we find abuses. if you're aware of abuses specific that we should know about, we will follow up with you and be glad to hear what they are so we can consider whether to investigate them. but i do think it's quite possible our rulemaking hasn't solved every problem in the marketplace x to the extent it hasn't, we want to continue to pursue -- and i forgot the third part of your question. >> related to that was does your rule making and does your enforcement and tracking address what seems to be massive use of this many money transfer opportunity -- this money transfer opportunity for folks being in and working in the country illegally and sending money overseas? >> our rulemaking does not address that. congress did not direct us to address that, and those would be issues for for other parts of te federal government and not us. >> so you don't trac

that rulemaking is pending. it was out for notice and comment.e have digested those comments, and we expect to finalize that we will finalize that rule sometime this spring. on fdic, i do not want over step proper bounds, but we have had conversations about it. many of these prepaid cards are of substitute bank accounts for people who are unbanked. we now have no consumer protections. this role will provide consumer protection for the first time, similar for those for bank accounts. the other thing i would say on this issue that is new is we had the rush card fiasco. consumer bureau was engaged in addressing that people had prepaid money on their cards and thousands of them found they cannot get their money off the cars because of an operational glitch by the company, some sort of problem, that we continue to sort through from the standpoint of an investigation and making sure consumers are made whole. that is outrageous. people prepaid money on their card to use it when they need it, and if they cannot, then they haven't cheated of their service

i also continued concerns over recent rulemaking to credit rating agencies. broad agreement and provisions in dodd-frank such as removal of reference to regulations are much needed an address is one of the causes of the financial crisis and worry many other micromanaging rules included in dodd-frank have had the effect of further siphoning competition and credit rating agent industry. i want to thank all the witnesses for the testimony and i yield to the ranking member for five minutes. >> good morning. thank you so much, mr. chairman for holding this important meeting and all of our participants today. this hearing will continue or subcommittee series of oversight hearing on the sec. today we are focusing on divisions and offices in the sec, the office of compliance, inspections and examinations, office of credit ratings. also the division of economic risk and analysis. all four offices play a critical role in policing our nation securities markets. the office of credit ratings oversees the registered credit rating agencies such as moody's, s&p and fitch. th

. >> wanna the climate problems is the rulemaking to focus on how well they are doing to redress there are many pop and for the protection in addition in the motor coach fighters but conducting rulemaking this with the excess the safety of all of our children. also chairman will be riding on the back seats because the seats back fails but children are left in a car and then see back straight standard with his loot -- there's still needed end contained in the vehicles if reenact the reporting requirements to produce them to safety but the act of 66 per checks the public for an unreasonable risk of accidents occurred because of the performance. the underlying principles have not changed in order for the agency to fulfill the statutory mission nhtsa need sufficient resources and a strong resolve for the enforcement authorities to protect the public. thank you very much. >> i mispronounced your name and i had a phonetics spelling which followed i should have done as well as after market parts of 256 million vehicles of the russian but there are many eight features available budget know col

congressay: deliberately required to go through the negotiated rulemaking process. the policy really is a critical fiscal check to make sure federal funds are layered on top of and not in place of state and local funding. teachers and principals in washington state, how important federal education dollars are to support resources in their schools and we need to make sure the federal dollars continue to augment state and local dollars and do not replace. you tell us about the feedback he received from stakeholders and how this was then incorporated in draft regulation? sec. king: your description is exactly right word as we gather feedback, we heard a request from civil rights groups, from parents, from educators, for on how it would ensure that the title i dollars are truly supplemental. we also heard concern that the prior methodology under no child left behind is often burdensome and left key decision-making to auditors rather than to educators. the new methodology reflects the input -- this new way of defining what districts need to do in their methodology reflec

it is plank et rulemaking and it contradicts the wishes of congress. all three branches agree that these actions are illegal. courts have issued an injunction. there was a friend of the court brief. the president's actions will lead to devastating new cost go for states. our health care system our judicial and law enforcement system and our education system will be strained as they try to accommodate the president's unconstitutional order. the executive branch has the chance to stand up and reinsert congressional power. hope the court rules perfectly. mr. yoho: i appreciate that. the constitution and the sovereignty of this nation is what is at stake here along with the institution itself. i would like to yield three minutes to mr. jody hice from the state of georgia. mr. hice: i'm grateful to the colleague from florida for yielding this time. today, the united states supreme court heard oral argument of what has potential of being one of the most important cases in our time. of course, we are talking about a case involving unprecedented and expansion

crashes so there is a huge opportunity of 80% of crashes could be prevented so we have introduced rulemaking for review to set up a consistent piece of equipment for the whole system in the united states give me a timeline. >> it is under review. >> two years? >> nimble and flexible. because it can lead the outdated cybersecurity why is it the other is everybody identifies not just for protection for them to see these automations. >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from california. >> taking very much for kids three to our i just want to thank you for of the work you do and translate that to you did your organization to address these issues you should be getting in front of. >> i have a fun feeling that was the answer. >> this committee is helping us get there. >> i am, at but the best way to kick in french and its british isn't often the end states to europe and other countries could work not always but it tends to a the saloon but with all due respect different heads if it but finally a march 26. there an incident didn't look forward touche your friend members of this to be a in and did

particularly with regard to the rulemaking by the bill. another area covered by the bill's performance and reporting. these provisions. these provisions would require the nrc to develop performance metrics for any activity requested by a licensee or applicant and report to congress for certain delays. this would require to develop metrics and milestone for many activities beyond those for which they are currently prepared. we believe we currently have metrics for the desired outcome. these measures recognize the adapt for applicant or licensee and account for emergent safety or security issues, changes in licensing plans and so forth. as written the proposed requirement may limit nrc flexibility in this area. in closing, i welcomed the commission's interest in and ideas for enhancing the nrc performance and success of our mission. this concludes my formal remarks. i think you for the opportunity to appear before you and would be pleased to respond to your questions. >> thank you, final witnesses the honorable jeffrey s merrifield chairman

we are not sing a lot of enforcement or rulemaking going on at the fec. don't have to take my word for it. lastly, the lawyer for the chamber of commerce, hardly a rabble rousing reform organization what --was complaining the fec was not issuing rules people need in order to comply with the law. most people out there really do want to comply with the law but a understand they have to be rules and they want to know what they are. we have not issued any substantive roles since citizens united interpreting that opinion and that is a big problem for a lot of people who are just trying to comply with the law. we recently had a slew of cases released a rising out of the 2012 election cycle. it is far too late for us to be resolving cases out of 2012, but we could not get our colleagues to vote on these cases. these cases involved a number of people who are funneling money lc's to political causes with the intent and three out of four of these cases, specific intent of hiding their identities. the american people have a right to know whose money is funding our e

. >> in prior rulemaking cms has already contemplated what would happen. cms said the treasury would still receive an apportioned fund.fund. so, the rule did not change because cms had to figure out what to do, the fund came up short. >> i think -- i'm sorry, can you repeat the question. >> the rule did not change because cms had to do what you have had to figure out what to do if the fund came up short. >> i think there was uncertainty as to how to handle situations if it did come up short, and so i believe that they looked at the situation and determined that was the best policy decision. public comment as to whether that was the right decision but laid out legal reasoning to get comment on whether or not it was appropriate. >> they had already contemplated the scenario that might come up short and then made the sleep to change their interpretation. this is what is so puzzling to us. as you say, lawyers reviewed it and changed our minds on that. i would think truth and law instead of interpretation, but let's go back to statute which fits directly to the

and does nhtsa have plans to pursue a rulemaking on cybersecurity? >> so let me start with the consequences. last july there was a highly-visible hack of a jeep which was at least planned, so there has been no malicious hack of any vehicle yet. but we highlighted it, it's no longer a con kept. it's -- concept. it's real. within days defect was called and a recall was underway. so we're going to act aggressively and get on those when possible. but you're bringing up an issue which is the more connected everything is, the more cybersecurity becomes critical. nhtsa's been on this since 2012 when we created an office specifically focused on it. this is my chance to thank everybody for their support in the fast act. we have about seven engineers on this, four in washington, three in ohio, and the fast act is going to allow us up to 20 new engineers to look at this. they are looking at a broad range from how you protect things to one of our recent research is what are the specific elements you would have to collect to see that hacking attempts were ongoing

the small business committee -- rulemaking. the small business committee has spent a great deal of effort to make sure this is as transparent as possible and -- in the accounting process. however agriculture enterprises have not been able to benefit from these advances due to a historic anomally. 46 different industries, as diverse as cattle ranching and citrus farming, are all subject to a single size standard that hasn't changed in nearly 20 years. that means that to qualify as small, a poultry farmer or a soybean producer can only have 750 -- $750,000 in receipts each year, and that is receipts, not revenues. for some agricultural producers, $750,000 does not cover the cost of a hobby farm. h.r. 3714 levels the playing field for these small farmers. it does not set a size standard, but instead requires that the s.b.a. examine the characteristics of these industries to develop size standards using the normal process. recognizing that a small dairy doesn't look like a small corn farm is common sense. my colleague, mr. scrmbing

i urge you to, in fact, read the rulemaking order that went along with it from 1996. what you'll see what it says, that it applies to one thing and one thing only. that's the accrual of social security benefits under section 1611(b). and the rulemaking order and we quoted this in our reply brief specifically says that although we're counting deferred action as lawful presence for the purpose of accruing social security benefits for the reason that if you can work lawfully, you ought to be able to accrue benefits. this does not confer any lawful status under the immigration laws. it specifically says that. and so we can argue about whether the executive has thewee executive has the authority in that narrow sense. we think we are right, but that is on the dog. if the phrase was stricken from the guidance -- justice alito: if the phrase was stricken from the guidance, for

right now, they stopped rulemaking, so we're going back to court.e were permitted by the judge of another oral argument. amy: julia olson, you're the head of our children's trust. what is that? talk about the judge's ruling? >> there are multiple cases going on. what our children's trust does is help elevate the voice by connecting them with attorneys to help them sue the governments for acting in ways that are destroying the climate system. the decision last friday is remarkable. there is really not been anything like it yet. it is very exciting. it is about protecting these young people's constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property, and to the public trust resources. amy: what was unusual about the ruling? >> the court has said the case can go forward, and it will be the first time that the federal government's fossil fuel policies will really be look that in accordance with the constitution and their obligations to protect young people and future generations. amy: what is the eugene climate recovery ordinance? law that young people, incl

here we have an example of a washington, d.c., bureaucratic interpreterive rulemaking -- rulemaking interpretation getting in the way of enabling entrepreneurs with good ideas from getting access to capital. and subsequently creating jobs in local communities. there's a simple solution to fix that. that is why i'm supporting this legislation. i'm proud of pennsylvania's long standing history as a leader in innovation and i want to do everything i can to remove barriers and support our local job creators. i encourage all of my deleegs -- all of my colleagues to support this bipartisan legislation and yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the gentlewoman from california is recognized. ms. waters: i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman reserves the balance of her time. the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. hensarling: mr. speaker, i'm very pleased now to yield two minutes to the gentleman from colorado, mr. polis, a member of the rules committee. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman

they were looking at on the order of greater than 60 new rulemakings which now the commission is saying they will not do. for industry that is performing exceptionally well and industry that have been regulating for 50 plus years. opportunitynificant for them to continue to do what they are doing and we think as they do with the industry is doing, they should deal with turnover, do what a lot of this attrition. basically, you're an opportunity to hire critical resources but probably not release -- replace all the resources which is what we are doing religiously. because of challenges we face. , what corporate overhead we see is really a tremendous benefit of having congress provide accountability and oversight in the corporate overhead. the corporate overhead based upon the study they commissioned is much higher than other agencies. there is not a lot of accountability because we pay for it. there is not a lot of oversight and there is little transparency from our side to seeing what we're paying for and why. it is a significant opportunity but we do not want to hurt the credibility or

nbc will have as much interaction of safety advocates with the activities and frankly but the rulemaking process exist for a reason in we are moving away from the industry standards spoon so we will regulate as we need to and expand. >> says gentleman yields back. but that is called the one nation program that was intended to coordinate or harmonize with the state regulations as much as possible. it has come to my attention to make compliance more difficult. it was to provide consistency with certain automakers. >> are you aware of the differences between programs that affect compliance. >> is their specific ones? >> epa credit

stakeholders from all sides of the issue were involved in the rulemaking. the department took time, listened to them and made multiple changes to make sure this rule is workable. i applaud the department of labor for their thoughtful and thorough rulemaking process, and i urge my colleagues to oppose this misguided legislation that seeks to block this important fiduciary rule. i thank ranking member scott for his leadership on this issue, and i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady from oregon yields back her time. the gentleman from virginia yields or reserves his time, and the gentleman from tennessee is recognized. mr. roe: i thank you, mr. speaker. a title does not make you honest. bernie madoff was a fiduciary, i might add. at this point i'd like to yield one minute to the distinguished chairman of the education and work force, colonel john kline from minnesota. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from minnesota is recognized for one minute. mr. kline: thank you, mr. speaker. and i thank the gentleman for yieldin

this issue has received more attention than any rulemaking petition and the history. i will vote against these nominees. before they are considered on the floor, we need commitments that they will stand with us and the 1.2 million americans who have weighed in on this issue. i thank the chair for the opportunity. >> thank you. six years ago, the supreme court drew a steamroller over the "we the people" principle of our democracy. citizens united unleashed a wave of -- that has changed our democracy from "we the people" to "we the powerful." corporate political spending has gone unchecked. democracy has been flooded by dark money from undisclosed sources. it is time to change that. people should decide our elections, not pocketbooks. we urged them to work on a rule to require publicly held companies to disclose spending to shareholders. it was on their agenda. the current chair of the fcc took it off. that is a move in the wrong direction. this type of disclosure is a critical step in fairness and transparency in political spending. it is time for the fcc to make this

i urge you to, in fact, read the rulemaking order that went along with it from 1996. what you'll see what it says, that it applies to one thing and one thing only. that's the accrual of social security benefits under section 1611(b). and the rulemaking order and we quoted this in our reply brief specifically says that although we're counting deferred action as lawful presence for the purpose of accruing social security benefits for the reason that if you can work lawfully, you ought to be able to accrue benefits. this does not confer any lawful status under the immigration laws. it specifically says that. and so we can argue about whether the executive has thewee executive has the authority in that narrow sense. we think we are right, but that is on the dog. if the phrase was stricken from the guidance -- justice alito: if the phrase was stricken from the guidance, for eligibility, for federal benefits. justice alito: the only federal -- none, those two statutory references. gen. verrilli: as i said, that is the tale on the dog. if i can go to the merit. repeatedly, y

[laughter] the chairman talked about this rulemaking as of locking the box because the rule making is so vague to create a standard about what gateway device or what reconfiguration or what types of mandates are imposed on cable operators that we have no idea of the capital cost we have imposed on companies that will take away broadband investment that the fcc is some of the most important things they want to the members to reduce no region not believe it is sensible rulemaking and frankly when i looked at the impact of the members will have disproportionate on smaller providers that is why we say it is not a good idea. >> why not they can? >> they do if you go to ride around quarter they have a nice display or exhibit of four or five different commercially available set top boxes that run that apps game consoles, a smart tv, netflix, a comcast all of those represent a new way to watch television on connected devices. but there isn't a government mandated standard by which to do that. that is the part that becomes difficult for us there wasn't one intel last year rang congress said it

they could petition for rulemaking. >> and that would be under section 553?ey do that? >> no, they did not do that here. >> could you have done the exact same thing without using that phrase in the dapa documents? >> absolutely. it's totally fine. i understand the issues that it's caused by its legal significance as a technical legal significance with respect to eligibility for social study benefits. that's detail on the dog and the fleet on the tail of the dog. >> you were asked about napa action. would they be entitled to a lease to ask for a preliminary injunction while the notice and comment procedure was commenci commencing? >> i don't know. forgive me, i have thought about that. i have my doubts if it would be entitled to get a preliminary injunction under those circumstances. >> they would have standing to object if the rulemaking hearing came out the wrong way. >> if we are talking about whether there's a notice and comment issue, you've decided they have standing. if they have standing, they would have standing in a notice and comment preceding. >> g

in china, the rulemaking that is being proposed right now is probably the most strict over the next fives in terms of reductions in the world. whatever that is, we will work to meet that. mark fields, ceo of ford, speaking to me over the weekend. increasinglyn tough regulatory environment in china, a country suffering chronic pollution problems. ford stickssaying by the letter of law in every operates.on where it he says he is completely confident in ford and its processes there. angie: pollution no doubt of focus. what other issues have been getting play in the lead up to the show? we have been talking about suv's, a lot of international and local companies launching suv's to take advantage of a growth in demand in china, up 50% in 2015, the demand for suvs. despite high import taxes for foreign brands, continue to be in demand. of course, electric vehicles, a lot of chinese players getting in on the action. a chinese tech company launching a concept car. infinity has launched a concept suv as well. mercedes-benz launched a new stretched version specifically for the chinese customer. th

we have actually introduced a rulemaking which has been accepted by only be to try and set up a consistent piece of equipment that would be used for the whole system in the united states. >> when viewing this but this thing online? give me a timeline on that. >> right now it's been accepted by only be as under review. that's where we are answering their questions. >> one year, two years? any kind of an estimate? >> i can tell you that the proposal is to have it out, i will check the filed and the proposal. we have a specific in the proposal for when it will be in the road. >> thank you. next question, nhtsa has announced several initiatives and workshops on numerous issues over the last six months and plans to complete work on these topics prior to the independent station, correct? okay. how are you ensuring adequate work stay cold engagement is done before the final actions are taken? >> well, for a variety of activities they are, in fact, open public meetings. recalls with open equipment others, distraction, live webcast with things. right now this secretaries announced in six months the

if you want to do a study going forward is fine but it did not say to start new rulemaking.ome to the commission to have said we have other proposals we would like you to consider in addition but that is not part of the rulemaking but the one in the standards to improve hundreds of millions of dollars and three think it is time for chairman wheeler to raise those issues that we have brought together where he said i hope i can have the industry collaboration. we are here to collaborate. >> host: hoosier competition and? >> today in the television market is directv, additional work, a little bit of time order. as well as at&t it a fairly large portion. we have a century linking and frontier as internet and phone competitors. we have some those to pipe bin as well. >> what about netflix? is that considered competition? >> no. complementary. i am a broad band company. i want to make a great product that consumers know they can acquire burger tried to make a careful distinction between television and video a linear television network that they have not traditionally but then ther

in a proposed rulemaking session here is what you proposed, forcing districts to include teachers salaries and how they measure their state and local spending. and require that state and local spending in title 1 schools be at least equal to the average spend in nontitle schools. if that were adopted your proposal would require a complete costly overhaul of almost all the state and local finance systems in the country, something we did not pass in the law. it would force teachers to transfer to new schools, something we did not pass in the law. it would require states and school districts to move back to the burdensome practice of detailing every individual cost when the purpose of the law as expressly written was to relieve some of that burden. according to the council of great city schools your proposed rule would cost $3.9 billion just for their 69 urban school districts to eliminate the differences in spending between the schools. now, i'm not interested to debate -- today in debating whether it's a good idea or bad idea to include teachers salaries when computing comparability. the pl

pleased to see they have come out and encourage them to move as quickly as possible to complete the rulemaking process so this could be put into effect. i haven't studied the details of what they have come out with. independent regulators who are going to design the details independently are going to accept input in terms of improving those rules and i am sure the ways one can handle the different issues that have been raised, but ultimately the goal they are trying to accomplish is an important one which is to reduce overly risky behavior that comes at the expense of taxpayers and the economy. >> the single biggest economic story of the week will affect pocketbooks. and if you have any thoughts, microeconomic monitoring, we are changing the way we spend money, what are the consequences of that in the economy and the policy matter in terms of other issues, and broaden our scope on this. >> the first question i was completely thrilled with what secretary will decided. he didn't consult me or my children. if he had one of them i strongly supported harriet tubman the other was in favor of rosa pa

thingss to divide such as rulemaking by the agency.m a call pushing roughly the same result by never having a role but telling everything -- everyone informally what they would do in such circumstances. ,t might be that the formal is other things being equal, final agency action in respect to that matter. it might be that the latter is not. i think what you are telling me is what i should do next is go read those federal rules and is thisons and see, more like informal advice, or is it more like formal rulemaking? i go and i make up my mind. that is my job in this instance. >> to help make up your mind, we would refer you to frozen foods. foods and abbott labs and bennett are examples of what falls on the formal final side of the line. a few other things will be on the other side of the line. frozen foods is virtually indistinguishable from this case. they were essentially a jurisdiction determination case. do you think this would count as a formal adjudication under the apa? >> yes. there is the -- the agency applied the law to a spec

i urge you to, in fact, read the rulemaking order that went along with it from 1996. what you'll see what it says, that it applies to one thing and one thing only. that's the accrual of social security benefits under section 1611(b). and the rulemaking order and we quoted this in our reply brief specifically says that although we're counting deferred action as lawful presence for the purpose of accruing social security benefits for the reason that if you can work lawfully, you ought to be able to accrue benefits. this does not confer any lawful status under the immigration laws. it specifically says that. and so we can argue about whether the executive has the authority to consider people with deferred action as lawfully present in that narrow sense. we think we're right. maybe they're right, but that is the tail on the dog here. that's not -- justice alito: well, if you if the phrase "lawful presence" were stricken from the guidance, would you take the position that dapa beneficiaries are not lawfully present for purposes of under certain statutes that use that phras

the house financial services subcommittee on capital markets also discussed the commission's rulemaking process is the dog sprang financial continues to be implemented. this is just over two

and through rulemaking, they're having the same impact as law.fing all of us in law enforcement across america. and this is where we need to put america, our families, our interests first for once, not illegals, not criminal illegals from foreign countries. these people that have been released should be deported never to return to america again. yet this president will never do so, and that's why he should be fired and all his cohorts should be replaced with americans who are going to do their job, enforce the laws that are on the books and put america first. absolutely. deirdre: so, sheriff, hold that thought, because we have this video of an arrest moments ago. donald trump, of course, leaving this event in california. we are still monitoring the situation there on the ground. my colleague is there, connell mcshane. so, connell, we watched with you two people get arrested. are there more? >> reporter: no, there's not. and i think finally, deirdre, this wave of protests is coming to an end because the police basically came up to the last remaini

and now for the rulemakers. have heard of the two men you're about to meet, but they're on the team that could decide the gop nominee and so possibly even the next president. they are members of the all-important rnc rules committee that meets in florida this week and has the ultimate say about those super complicated delegate rules. rnc chair reince priebus says he zchblt want the rules to subvert donald trump. glad to have you both. mr. evans, did you ever think when you accepted the assignment that the rules committee would have as much importance as apparently itful have before cleveland? >> absolutely. the rules committee always is important. >> really? >> yes. because the rules really can dictate the outcome. look what we learned from 2012 where the romney campaign came in and put a rule in that said you had to have eight states in order to be nominated. we had one person in nomination. yes, we always knew the rules would be important. the important thing is, there's such sensitivity, especially with donal

>> well, transportation secretary last year announced rulemaking that requires all recreational and commercial drones to be registered with the faa so the agency can figure out the state of drones that's international airspace. the secretary says that flying in international airspace is serious business so we can have objects going across national airspace systems without the faa knowing what's up there but as you said john, there are 700,000 drones that were purchased last year. and they are expected to have that rise up to 1 million and consumers are attracted to these things. banning them probably may be a more difficult economic issue than we think. as you said, the horse is out of the barn but as we look into the future, we are going to see package delivery systems that amazon is proposing. we are also going to see if you look at google versus facebook, filling our skies with drones. they're going to talk try to take the internet all across the world and they are going to be using drones to do that. in the next decade we are probably going to see our skies looking more like hanna-barbera

telecom saying the administration's disregard for the integrity of the rulemaking process is appallingusion by the white house. back to you. >> kevin good, to see you. we'll be right back. ♪ you're not gonna watch it! ♪ ♪ no, you're not gonna watch it! ♪ ♪ we can't let you download on the goooooo! ♪ ♪ you'll just have to miss it! ♪ yeah, you'll just have to miss it! ♪ ♪ we can't let you download... uh, no thanks. i have x1 from xfinity so... don't fall for directv. xfinity lets you download your shows from anywhere. i used to like that song. >>> budget cuts are talking a toll on the u.s. marines, most of them, their planes have been grounded. from 2010 to 2015 military spending fellly $130 billion. senior officials say that's hurting the military's able to respond in a crisis. jennifer griffin got an exclusive look at the home of the marines aviation force and is live at the pentagon. >> reporter: marines have always prided themselves on doing more with less, but what we heard over and over at marine air station buford and blue river it's been this bad. of the only 30 part of the jet f

here in china, the legislation or the rulemaking that is being proposed right now is probably the mostover the next five years in terms of reduction, in the world. whatever that is, we will work to meet that. that was the ceo afford, mark fields. i also spoke to be bulldozed ceo. ceo.e volvo we heard from the ceo of daimler saying that there needs to be more transparency from the industry on this issue. anna: what about demand for cars? away from the emissions scandal, what about the underlying demand for cars in china? there is a lot of hype around suv's, i think, this year. it shouldn't detract from the fact that this is still the world's largest car market, with 7% growth in 2015. it is slowing. we have seen in the first quarter that sales are up about 14%. i asked before and ceo about this. they benefited from a tax cut. that tax cut could and that the end of this year. he expects sales to be pretty good. was it into for the ceo mark fields. >> we have not been surprised that the market has held up. part of that has been a consumption tax reduction put into place in the third quart

legislation passed, or if you can't get new legislation passed, get the agencies to exercise their rulemaking authority to achieve your policy objectives to the extent permissible. and that "to the extent permissible" becomes really the battleground. so the agencies have a tendency, and it's understandable, to push the envelope. and chevron really encourages that, because an agency might say, well, can we get away with this? is it really legal? well, it's ambiguous. okay, let's go for it, that kind of rationale x. that's where i think the courts really have to step in. again, a bipartisan issue. i don't think this is a partisan issue at all. the court's job is to hold true to the line that congress set forth. >> chevron, 1984, the precedent can, chevron v. nrdc. you mentioned the two-part test, how ambiguous is the statute -- doctor yes. >> and then how reasonable is the interpretation by the agency if at ambiguous, and then the tendency has been if it seems reasonable, then the agency gets its way. >> uh-huh. >> is it time to revisit chevron? and if not overturn it -- >> right. >> -- in whol

so i think you have to look at both the history of the rulemaking and the fact -- >> let me interrupt you right there. >> sure. >> is it fair to say, though, that after a first ballot, there really are no rules, the delegates at the convention decide whatever they want to decide if you've got a majority in the convention, they can create any rule they want to create and they can nominate anyone they want to nominate? >> generally, everyone is bound on the first ballot, and some states they're bound on a couple of votes, but you're right that on the second or third ballot, more and more delegates are unbound, and they can vote for who they want. now, you still would have to get a certain amount of states and delegates in place in order to be nominated, and so that's important. you can't just have one person out there nominating a candidate, but generally your premise is correct, but there are rules in place to prevent, you know, 50 people getting nominated. you have to demonstrate a certain amount of support and a certain amount of states in order to get nominated. that all being said,

and what is the role of congress in this entire rulemaking process? since they originally wrote the law. any questions from the audience? john. he's going to bring the microphone over to you. and it won't go through the speakers but it will go through the network. so just talk away. >> john p. hawk, carnegie mellon university. two of you have emphasized the fact that there are different rules for different players. but the fcc -- if what you want is the same rules everywhere, the fcc can't give you that. they have title 1 authority over commercial broadband internet access providers. they don't have authority over starbucks when they provide me internet access. the only way to get that is legislation. so are you calling, the congressional staff in this room, are you calling for broad-based privacy regulation across awful these -- legislation across all these providers? >> so do you want to opt in for privacy legislation from congress or do you want to just be opted out of this fcc rule? >> i think to be clear the previous fcc requirements with opt --