always, not only a political, but also a military aspect, we’ll talk about it with our good friend ruslan pukhov there is some understanding already of how it could happen that an obviously well-prepared operation, literally under the noses of the israelis , was missed. you know, in fact, despite all the sensationalism of this failure in the field of intelligence. there are many such examples in history. soviet military intelligence is also the interpretation and reporting of this information to the top political leadership, here in the classic work of the famous american political scientist robert jorvis, why intelligence fails, there are such terms, if the expectation of the accuracy of intelligence data forces politicians to look for assessments that strengthen their positions, give them confidence, then knowledge is not uncommon. intelligence allows them to reject or ignore inconvenient reports, that is, whatever you want, you can turn it around, it is quite obvious that the israelis are very fixated on hamas, oh, sorry, in hezbollah, on the west bank of the jordan in iran, it seemed to them

let's talk about it with our good friend ruslan pukhov. ruslan, hello. good afternoon. could happen. which is obviously good the prepared operation literally under the noses of the israelis was missed, you know, in fact, with all the sensationalism of this failure. in the field of intelligence, there are a lot of such examples in history, the fact is that intelligence activity is not only the collection of information in which, by the way, for example, both the americans and soviet military intelligence have always been strong, it is also the interpretation and communication of this information to top political leadership, in the classic work of the famous american political scientist robert jorvis, why intelligence fails, there are such deadlines, if the expectation of accuracy of intelligence leads politicians ... to seek assessments that strengthen their positions, give them confidence, then knowledge of the frequent fallibility of intelligence allows them to reject or ignore inconvenient reports, that is you can turn it the way you want, it is quite obvious that the

let's talk about it with our good friend, ruslan pukhov. ruslan, hello. good afternoon.standing of how it could happen that an obviously well-prepared operation, literally under the noses of the israelis, was missed. well, you know, in fact, with all the sensationalism of this failure in the field of intelligence , there are many such examples in history... the fact is that intelligence activity is not only the collection of information, which, by the way, has always been directly , for example, both the americans and soviet military intelligence are strong, it is also the interpretation and communication of this information to the highest political leadership, here in the classic work of the famous american political scientist robert jorvis, why intelligence fails, and there are such deadlines if the expectation of accuracy of intelligence data forces politicians to look assessments that strengthen their positions give them confidence, then knowledge of the frequent fallibility of intelligence data allows them to reject or ignore inconvenient reports, that is, as you wa

ruslan pukhov, a leading military specialist, is our regular participant, but on the other hand, we simultaneouslynce to ukrainian colleagues, so to speak, right on the battlefield, or at least close to it, how to explain this? you know, this is a very strange situation, reminiscent of the russian fable about crayfish swans and pike, yes, on the one hand, british involvement in this conflict since the time of... johnson is absolutely disproportionately large, in general, it has now actually been proven, that it was johnson who was behind the torpedoing of those agreements in istanbul, which could have been in the spring of last year. we see that the newly appointed minister of defense has done this statement, prime minister richa sunak immediately refuted it, saying that if we send someone, it will only be after the war in homeopathic doses. i think this is due to two points, well, firstly, sunak , like... the military knows that the uk’s military budget is very limited, especially the ground forces, and it is extremely, extremely difficult to simply send instructors, and secondly, if they will be