well, i have to quote what the speaker of the verkhovna rada said councilor ruslan stepanchuk of theummit of the crimean platform, quoting, rfe/rl's website in ukrainian legislation, quoting stefanchuk, there are certain inconsistencies regarding holding and not holding elections both at the parliamentary and presidential levels, we are currently discussing, stefanchuk noted, these are the issues, but i want to so that everyone understands that we have five key problems that we need to solve, the first is the right of military personnel to vote and nominate, the second is the right of refugees to vote, the third is how to conduct elections in temporarily occupied territories, the fourth is the financing of elections and the fifth is free access to the media, we cannot allow russia to use the freedom of speech in ukraine to spread propaganda, so he outlined the smaller problems, so to speak, so the key problem, it is possible, so to speak i don't know what to say there, social, so to speak, big , big tension and big scandal, yes, but, well, whatever, now, by the way, yesterday or the

earlier, the chairman of the verkhovna rada, ruslan stepanchuk , said that he would not put the initiative to ban the uocp to a vote, because there were not enough votes for it. the other day behind the podium. in the parliament, the author of such draft law 82:21, people's deputy mykola knyazhyvskyi addressed stepanchuk. he emphasized: banning the roc is not a matter of freedom of speech, national security of the state. the russian church in ukraine should be banned. this is a matter of our national security. this is the largest public organization that is directly subordinate to gundyaev and the kremlin, which is zombifying. ukrainian people, which brings millions of ukrainians to rallies against the ukrainian state and our values. at the same time, we must realize that all these people, most of them, unlike their clergy, are innocent, and it is our responsibility to help these people. our responsibility is not to show the will of the judges, but the will of the ukrainian people of the state, which should tell them: break ties with moscow, break ties with gundyaev, no one forbids you to

the day before, chairman of the verkhovna rada ruslan stepanchuk, he commented, said that delegations, more than 70 delegations should join the prague summit, and he said that he, for example, does not even remember any other similar confusion of so many parliaments, so many... parliamentary assemblies, so there is really a large representation here, today in the opening speeches it was said that at least 50 countries have their representatives here in prague, and eight, eight countries and parliamentary delegations promised to send their video messages, and here i want to draw attention to what i especially saw, what is interesting, is that, for example, a country like poland has not yet officially confirmed 100%, that at least a video message will arrive, that is, there is no question of personal presence at all, but it is probably still unknown, we will be able to verify this today, whether there will be a video message from the polish representative at all, but there must be a marshal of the polish sejm, at least in video format, why is this significant, because if we recall the l

parliamentary summit, the first was held in zagreb, now in prague, and concluding the discussion, ruslan stepanchuk said that there will be a third summit and he hopes that it will be in crimea, well , these are the statements that soon crimea can be liberated and come back under control of kyiv, were also repeated, in particular, the minister of foreign affairs of the czech republic, jan lipavsky, spoke about this, he explained, so to speak, his statement that his vacation in crimea is approaching, he said: that he shares the opinion that if moscow stops to control crimea, then, accordingly, it will never again be able to threaten any of its neighbors and generally destabilize security in europe, and that is why he wants to return to crimea, and not for the sake of tourism, as such, not for the sake of beautiful mountains or bagchisrai palace, and i am quoting jan lipavskyi, precisely in order to return to crimea as part of free, democratic ukraine. there was also a lot of talk about volodymyr zelenskyi's peace formula, and many of the delegates mentioned it in their speeches. let me remind you th

previously, the head of the verkhovna rada was ruslan stepanchuk stated that he does not put the initiative to ban the uocp to a vote, because there are not enough votes for it. the other day, from the podium in the parliament, stepanchuk was addressed by the author of such draft law 822. the russian orthodox church is not a matter of freedom of speech, but of national security of the state. the russian church in ukraine should be banned, it is a matter of our national security. this is the largest public organization that directly reports to gundyaev and the kremlin, that zombifies ukrainian people, that brings millions of ukrainians to rallies against the ukrainian state. ours values, at the same time, we must realize that all these people , most of them, unlike their clergy, are innocent, and it is our responsibility to help these people, our responsibility to show not the will of the judges, but the will of the ukrainian state, which should tell them to break ties with moscow, break ties with gundyaev, no one forbids you to go to your churches and pray to god, in total, 11 draft laws we

speaker ruslan stepanchuk recently stated that there are no votes in the parliament. at first glance, this is true, they have always said about the moscow patriarchate in ukraine: a solid church for solid people. and although the star days of yanukovych have long passed, and now in... there is a serious lobby of the russian orthodox church. journalists conducted an investigation and found out that in the presidential faction, in the service of the people , more than a third of the 200 deputies oppose any restrictions on the activities of the russian orthodox church in ukraine. russian peace has not disappeared anywhere, neither from this hall, nor from our powerful offices. despite the unleashed genocide of our people, thousands of dead at the front and in the rear, millions of mutilated ukrainian destinies. the newspaper glavkom published an investigation, where it was named. the biggest lobbyists of the moscow church in parliament in the past, the entire opzh faction, especially vadym novinskyi, yuriy boyko, mykhailo dopkin, as of now , those who have still retained