and now i hope we will become russians for real, but we're with russia. russia is with us. one, anyone who doesn't want or is unable to visit appalling station will be visited by an election worker who will go to their homes to collect their ballads. it's difficult for residents in russian control territories to avoid voting for some ukrainians. it became the perfect time to lead these territories once and for all. what a shame is, little in the proverb. so rootman as upon the, the referendum is a violation of international law. but it is a legal movable and that we hear that people in the occupied areas are forced to vote at gunpoint. some of them either from was readable as to what keith calls coons referendum, a propagandist. and while the west is citing international law to call it illegal, how much support does russia really have in the occupied territories? and that's a question i like to pass on to roman in bond at the referenda is obviously a sham. we have established that many times, but other people in the numbers are indeed pro russian. if these referendums were

not in russia's interest to do and it's not in russia's interest to do and it's not in russia's interest to do do do the fact that it isn't isn't in anyone's the fact that it isn't isn't in anyone's the fact that it isn't isn't in anyone's interest is probably obvious to everyone interest is probably obvious to everyone interest is probably obvious to everyone except maybe vladimir putin himself from except maybe vladimir putin himself from except maybe vladimir putin himself from what you've observed going back to the what you've observed going back to the what you've observed going back to the past few years even not just the past past few years even not just the past past few years even not just the past eight months of putin's rule do you have eight months of putin's rule do you have eight months of putin's rule do you have confidence in him not using the nuclear confidence in him not using the nuclear confidence in him not using the nuclear option or like many others myself option or like many others myself option or like many others myself included do believe that he's capable of i

because it is too dangerous for russia itself russia is not so far away. and to detonate a nuclear bomb or to bomb ukraine with a nuclear weapon be it a tactical weapon or any other kind. it would mean it is too high a risk for russia itself or its neighbor. belarus. let me ask gustav whether you would agree with that assessment. as he mentioned, vladimir putin has said that he is prepared to use any weapon in russia's arsenal to defend russian territory and now that he has annexed her son and several other regions he considers those to be russian territory. on the other hand us intelligence services say that they do not see evidence that russia's nuclear posture has changed. so what are you expecting to the extent that you can assess? well i second the u. s. assessment, we have very closely watched the preparation of the non nuclear exercises. were very closely watched a test of a nuclear drone. russia has tested in the previous month and we could very well trace the movements of physical material of uh reactor course etcetera. so we know when russia move

and the fact that russia denies it is no proof at all. russia has denied many things. why why is it likely? i think it helps russia right now in its main goal to create fear, to create fear and to destabilize the west and to break the western front supporting ukraine. that's the main goal right now and it supports this goal. so i think yes, it is very likely that russia did this. so, another move is of course, uh the referendum drive them in ukraine vladimir putin is pushing ahead with his plans to annex large parts of ukraine and these so called referendums in areas of ukraine that are controlled by russia. just his latest move, these are the images that russia wants the world to see people at polling stations exercising their right to vote and saying what he wants to hear. a anyone who doesn't want or is unable to visit a polling station will be visited by an election worker who will go to their homes to collect tir ballots. it's difficult for residents and russian controlled territories to avoid voting for some ukrainians, it became the perfect time to leave these t

it's important for russia because it is the only point in ukraine which russia managed to well managed. russia managed to cross that you probably are the biggest river in ukraine, which divides the country in 2 halves in east and west. and it is very difficult to cross. it's a natural barrier. and russia managed to cross new, brought in the early days of the invasion. and from, from this, from this place, it is planning to go further west to towards michel live, which is a neighboring city and odessa, which is extremely important for the port for ukraine on the black sea. and if russia succeeds, ukraine would lose access to the black sea. so it is extremely important for russia to hold on to be on that right bank of the new pro river. and it is extremely important just from the opposite side for ukraine to, to get it back. and it is also important because it's very close to crimea to the annexed crimea, or where russia in is it, is getting a supplies with fresh water from the new property, which is also from the origin of hassan. so it is, it is in the focal point of this war for both

it's important for russia because it is the only point in ukraine which russia managed to well managed. russia managed to cross the you probably are the biggest river in ukraine, which divides the country in 2 halves in east and west. and it is very difficult to cross it's natural barrier. and russia managed to cross new, brought in the early days of the invasion. and from, from this, from this place, it is planning to go further west to towards michel live, which is a neighboring city and odessa, which is extremely important for the port for ukraine on the black sea. and if russia succeeds, ukraine would lose access to the black sea. so it is extremely important for russia to hold on to be on that right bank of the new pro river. and it is extremely important just from the opposite side for ukraine to, to get it back. and it is also important because it's very close to crimea to the annexed crimea, or where russia in is it, is getting a supplies with fresh water from the new property, which is also from the origin of hassan. so it is, it is on the focal point of this war for both side

the main question simply remains open, what will happen to russia, a public question that i just want to ask for the last 10 10 minutes, what will happen to russia, gentlemen, well, let's refer to our general budanov, yes, the head of the main intelligence department, who said that there are two scenarios, or russia, that's all after all, they know more there and give us information, but this is very logical, that's what he says and he said, let's just repeat his theses here. he said that the first option is that russia is recovering, that is, what forces are healthy forces in the russians understand that something needs to be decided , decided at their own level, and they offer education in this regard, including to ukraine, and that they are apologizing, that they admit all their mistakes, that they are leaving all the countries they occupied or parts of the countries they occupied and it's not only ukraine, it's not only crimea, donbas, it's that, it's to a large extent, which concerns those parts of the countries that are now considered subjects of the federation of abkhazia, that

well being dependent on russia? to a point, i'm assuming that they didn't know about how much they depended mother called that there are certain values and rules or norms that needed to be defended regardless. and so they chose to do that. and unfortunately, everybody's going to live out the consequences of that. and so i would say that it's not a knee jerk reaction from the europeans, but i would have hope that they might have been much more wiser in which live, in which they are laid their counter sanctions. because these are effectively, i mean, the equivalent of nuclear sanctions on russia and they cannot expect then that normal business intercourse is police and in the, in terms of energy supply would, would, would operate. with that, i would understand that some of the rushes actions may seem extremely distasteful to the europeans or somebody else, but they are beans also have to do with the americans. and some of the american policies that we, europe are hard to describe as friendly and even if we look at thi

russia here on that score. but also they see that you is another competitor that they want to under bond, which they are doing, right. they use it much worse shape than, than the u. s. so i think it's about dominance as well. and about empire preservation. the u. s. is a dying empire and it's desperately clinging to its empire. at this point, it hasn't come out like we talked about the united states. so we discussed russia, we discussed the ukraine. let's talk about the rest of the world. the kremlin is now trying to frame it's own cause as a broad fight against haji morning neil colonialism. acknowledge is the 1st and foremost that pursues its own national interests, economic and political independence and sovereignty. but i think putting in many of his speeches stresses that ultimately that 5 is also creating the ground for more democratic international system. do you think there's any support for this kind of car within the larger known western world? i do, i think in it that's being reflected in the un vote

uh, an integral part of russia . at how russia responds very seriously. uh, what ukraine did with the crimean bridge and, uh, the united states has a desire to demonstrate that uukraine is military you won’t win in ways, and well, show them to the ukrainians, uh, so that they don’t lose, as it were, the fighting spirit that america is with them is politics. this may be bad policy. it may be the wrong policy, but it's a serious policy. well, then there is the politicking, again on the eve of the midterm elections, of a very administration, i don’t want to give the impression that they are afraid of russia, that they are afraid of putin, that they are starting to retreat, and uh, we must give president zelensky his due, and he managed to put himself almost like world figure, when he, in my opinion, is just brazenly enough, but explains to world leaders what they should do to him and how they are wrong if they do not immediately satisfy his ever-growing demands. and this is an interesting thing. you hear in washington t

we want russia to thrive. we need russia. [applause] again, attempts at world domination's have been forwarded many times by the great russian people. and now again we will protect our people and our values. our enemies believed they won't have to suffer the consequences of their actions. that there will be no ramifications. but that is not true. all the agreements that have been reached before on global security or agreements between governments are no longer respected or valued. many of our former leaders actually listened to our western enemies and decided to give up their weapons, their power to everything. they listened to the lies and they believed them. and that has led to what is now called a rule-based world order. which rule are we talking about? who agreed on those rules, that the west proclaims? these are all lies. his are all double standards. and hypocrisy. take us for fools. in russia is a civilization of thousands of years, and we will not live according to someone else's rules. [applause] it is this so-called

yes, she supports such a putin, such a russia, no one is going to attack russia.ook too weak now in the eyes of china and the same comrade ? don't throw a tantrum because i, well, you know, well, what to do, it's all one thing, you have to somehow have him as an ally , even one who is all the same territory in russia , nuclear weapons, resources, and so on. and it's not clear that such a defeat will really be big for for russia in the whole war, will there be some kind of situational tactical defeat or even some kind of postponed defeat, because they think that russia is still needed by them as an ally, especially since they have no one to choose so directly ? who wants to be such an important ally for the people 's republic of china and therefore neglect russia here, they simply cannot even a weakened russia, even russia, which has framed china to some extent, even russia, which has demonstrated its weakness and look, there were these valdai monologues of putin , and the expert who talked to some of you in front of you said that all this rhetoric and all these an

it is a symbol, a symbol that crimea is russia, that it is part of russia is tethered connected to the mainland, and that russia is not going anywhere. so when you crane, according to the words of the russian president vladimir putin chose to attack the crimean ridge, well, it wasn't received well here in russia. he, in the dawn bass among the population. so it is widely seen that today's strike is indeed retaliation. and basically moscow vladimir putin and the defense ministry showing that one ukraine. and if you crane crosses more red lines, the reaction will be maybe even disproportionate. but adequate. we heard earlier from the former new zealand deputy foreign minister mat robson, he told my colleague a union o'neill that the crimean bridge attack was just one of the reasons why russia is now stepping it up. russia has had to widen its response and that's understandable. the bombing of the, the, the attack home on the crime in bridges. the one aspect the, the build up and the constant flow of arms and weapons, and training and intelligence by the united states and the cell eyes to

but i think the growth is very, very rough in russia. russia can sell the same as they need if they needed to make them not so with europe and less. so the u. s. can pretty much but, but europe not, we're just being started. i believe 2023. maybe in the 2024. it's going to be much work. the u. s. has published its new national security strategy, identifying keith on the future of its murphy development. according to the document, washington will be turning its eyes to the indo pacific. we have entered a consequential new period of american foreign policy that will demand more of the united states in the indo pacific than has been asked of us since the 2nd world war . no region will be of more significance to the world into every day americans in the indo pacific place in the end of the region on the u. s. map of interest is justified in the document, as it was a great need for american leadership, leadership inches, outcompetes in china, and constraining russia which are named as washington's arrivals. china is accused of wanting to reshape the international world or the wild. russia is la

and that would be open skies and russia always fear that the united states was developing a plus b. russia has not attacked any united states on any european country. that is a military operation looking at how are you in the defensive war or you could have been and america doesn't make any sense to be the c. i director the u. s. defense secretary, they, they've actually admitted there's no evidence of an imminent nuclear threat from moscow to ukraine. but, but what we're noticing is, is that the news articles, the press agencies, they don't report that they report fear, fear a nuclear again. why is that the case? for several reasons? first of all, this is the way the u. s. is always a waged, it's war is they always have to have a bogeyman. they always have to have an existential threat. they always have to have something which is going to destroy the earth or destroy the order. this is a weapon of mass distraction. we're, we're making people in the west believe that in russia there is some sort of crazy tyrant wants to eat up to create and destroy the rest of the world. if julius were to

and russia is running out of things in russia and things are running out in russia, resources are running zero, russia will not be able to continue waging war from day to day, you are a person who knows everything that is happening in russia. please tell me how many resources russia has and how much it is capable of continuing this deadly war in ukraine . unfortunately, there are not many resources, including military ones. just the other day, there was a scandal in the far east, it turned out that one and a half million sets of military uniforms disappeared from warehouses, and no one knows where these mobilized people went, what to wear, but despite the fact that division, despite the corruption , even if the reserves are large enough, they relax here and hope that everything will end. it is probably not worth the extra money, but it is not worth it. the guests will need them with one line of three on five, they will send a-and mobilizers to kill them, therefore, in this sense, we hope that tomorrow they will run out of shells and guns . number of combat operations. and this information

russia europe is that part of the world that is losing its positions in africa with uh, china and russiaquire them, we will now interrupt, and after a short advertisement we will talk about a pleasant abrasive. this wild feeling is the top of lonely people, of course, mikhailovich, he saw what we see, but in a completely different way, and therefore it expresses a lot to leave for moscow without work without housing. that's where, for example, zhvanetsky lived, he filmed near the airport. he rented a one-room apartment, my friend zvonitsky on saturday on pervoi wait large by five small portraits normal no, and these are small, but today i don’t kiss after the first season, firstly, i didn’t see anything. and secondly, i have more interesting things to do here. you live, yes, i live with him, his internet is faster. special offers and save up to 40 percent on fast internet for the whole family. choose yours on mts.ru. even more benefits with the new banking ozone card, millions of goods at discounted prices every day. open additional discounts. open the basic map in the ozon application,

that's what does not come from russia. this is all the machinations of the kremlin, but you look at yourself. are they really so almighty that any criticism addressed to our opponents is perceived as the kremlin's machinations, the hand of the kremlin is some kind of nonsense, yes, what have they rolled down? well, at least move your brains somehow more interesting to state your point of view. state it somehow, conceptually, you can’t blame everything on e, the kremlin’s kosher extremely importantly notes the president. at the same time, russia is not throwing down now, it does not plan to challenge the west to become a hegemon, russia is open to equal and safe cooperation, russia, being an independent and original civilization , has never considered and does not consider itself an enemy of the west americano phobia anglophobia francophobia germanophobia. these are the same forms of racism as russophobia and anti-semitism, however, like any manifestations. you just need to clearly understand what is, as i already said befo

russia as a terrorist state is a terrorist. increasing international pressure on it. grateful to those leaders and politicians who understand this and ensure it. i am especially grateful to the senate of poland, which made a decision to officially recognize russia as a state sponsor of terrorism, and such decisions have to be adopted by the majority of the countries of the world, russia itself in its actions leaves no alternative. i thank everyone who helps us fight against russian terror. kudos to everyone who fights and works for the freedom of ukraine. kudos to ukraine. the time for negotiations between kyiv and moscow has not yet come, at least at this stage. war, such statements were made in washington in the white house, at the same time they reassured that they do not see russia's preparation for the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine , and the biden administration does not rule out the introduction of new sanctions against iran for cooperation with moscow and now we are in direct contact my colleague from washington dmytro anopchenko you will learn all the deta

they blame on russia and solely on russia. europe is becoming industrialized. they will not publicly say that, but they are the beneficiaries of the process. the united states is winning back its industrial power by attracting european businesses, european companies, european manufacturing, to the united states, and that is a boon for them. now, europe may become poor i, europe may become less advanced europe now because that europe will not, will not seek to separate a geopolitical and militarily from the united states. indeed, the opposite is happening. europe has never been as closely allied with united states as it is today. so no, i don't think that the feel the pinch, the europeans filled the pinch, the pinch, but not the americans. americans are the beneficiaries of. there was so far, and of course, all these weapons that are being sent to ukraine, all these weapons that are destroyed in ukraine. and these are these things mean more orders for american defense companies. and that is, that is another good. and that also means higher gas prices at the pump

but if nato attacks in any way, russia, that's a 3rd world war, because russia is going to retaliate against all nato member states. and that would be the end of, of europe and perhaps over humanity. once we start playing these kinds of games. and i cannot understand why the leaders of the, of the west are urging themselves to commit suicide. i cannot understand that, but it is. but we must also not forget that last week it was when a is an entropy, again said that he's going to apply for a fast track application to join nato. and of course, it was positively accepted by some nato countries. but recently the united states came out and said that it's not the moment to do that because even that would cause a cause, a war between the west and russia with the destructive consequences for humanity. so this is a very strange game that is being played. it's a very dangerous game and it is very interesting for the world and for, for, for humanity. and i think that this should stop and i hope that the west just doesn't give any more importance to words. and then you said then starts ignoring

we must say that russia will disintegrate, and only the disintegration of russia, its dismantling isf the security of europe, because by its actions over the past seven and a half months, russia has put itself in fact, outside european and world laws, outside the norms of national law, these are obvious absolute realities, this must be taken into account once again. imperial ideology, but let's not be naive and let's not think that it is possible to turn off the russian world once and for all, it is impossible, even the west will not always accept it . referendum let's make concessions to russia well, they say that elon musk had some kind of marketing goal, you have something else here with twitter, but you know it all so dead poultices well , this is just a vivid example of the fact that the russian measure he can be everywhere or if he can still be well paid we don't know we haven't heard or seen but they are for one of the richest people in the world - it can have its own interests as they say well we won't we won't say we didn't hold a candle yes that we should aim for the long g

we're not in war. russia, in fact, they aren't war with russia. they're sending all sorts of arms to ukraine. that are killing people that are killing russians that have killing ukrainians. that of the want to live longer, the key of regime sunlight, nato is a party to the war. but, you know, now they're a little bit worried because russia may just, you know, dispense with the niceties and just say, well, yeah, you are who to the war, whatever, you know, no matter what you say. so i think, you know, stole timber, of wasn't, wasn't acting, he is truly jittery. he's truly nervous. and all those, you know, his real loss is of course, in washington. obviously they didn't give in good enough instructions because they don't know what to do now, either because they're not really anxious to flight. russia will also, in his speech, and friday, vladimir putin claimed the west was behind. this week's mysterious damage to the north stream gas pipelines running from russia to europe. video and that moves little negotiable, mcgee's fidelity of the anglo saxons

russia to occupied crimea.e, at the united nations, the general assembly has voted 143 to 5 to condemn russia's annexation of four territories seized from ukraine. this is linda thomas greenfield, the u.s. representative to the united nations. >> the united nations will not tolerate attempts at illegal annexation. we will never recognize it. these united nations will not tolerate seizing a neighbor's land i force. we will stand up to it. these united nations will not tolerate the destruction of the u.n. charter. amy: 35 nations, including china and india, abstained from the u.n. vote condemning russia's annexation. this is gene shuang, china's deputy u.n. ambassador. >> we have always believed any action taken by the general a similar should be conducive to the de-escalation of the situation, should be conducive to the early resumption of dialogue and should be conducive to the promotion of a political solution to this crisis. the draft resolution submitted will not help achieve the above-mentioned objectives.

russia tells the world it can't be cancel, and 7 million fellow citizens who have chosen to be with russiaay welcome home or for this temples varvara nevskaya polina onishchenko nikita korneev alexander janitors. dmitry veshkevich, ivan zamurin to lead the signing ceremony of the treaties on the admission of donetsk luhansk people's republics and zaporizhia kherson regions to the russian federation was held in the kremlin as vladimir putin stressed millions of residents made their elective referendums president dwelled on the reasons for this decision appealed. only to all citizens of russia, but also to the western masters of the kiev regime, all the details of anastasia yefimova's signing ceremony. treaties of the russian federation of the four territories, if officially, but unofficially for millions of residents of kherson, zaporozhye, donetsk and lugansk regions, today is in fact. returning home to the big russian world, with which they connect their future, and they spoke about this in no uncertain terms within the framework of the referendum held in all these territories. the head o

the idea of russia stepping in to help euro pin businesses is hardly a sign that russia has been weakened. it is, however, a pretty good indication of the harm that europe has done to itself through its own sanctions. the same former populace. glinda stag deputy also had a few things to say about the recent catastrophic vandalism of germany's energy lifelines nord stream, one and 2 into our government is not able to act in the interests of its own people . and this is noticeable throughout the political space. we ourselves pass one decree, one lark, to another one decision after another, which destroys our factories. germany's prosperity and industrial power rest on 2 pillars, the work ethic of the german people, and the cheap energy that we have received from russia for decades. now this concept has been destroyed with our own hands. we cannot get affordable energy from russia. you can forget about it from the u. s. the u. s. is now making huge profits . each tanker of liquefied natural gas brings about $200000000.00 in profits to the treasury. as long as such prices dominate the market,

it's not something that russia is able to veto and russia takes russia. i would really say not just putin takes a very different view of it. so that's already there in the 1990s, but it's under the surface. that is an intractable aspect of intractable of this of this conflict these two world views that will never be squared. yeah with one another and you're right all russian leaders gorbachev yeltsin and before putin felt and russian military officials russian intellectuals russian government of figures that moment when they had some political parties, you know, russians of all stripes felt a sense of humiliation and also that the united states and the west were piling on and almost taking advantage of russia in the way some of these negotiation went about the for one expansion of nato. what did you say? no, i mean, i think that that's that's true. i mean, i think from an american point of view that was known that was that made a sense. but you know, the united states was an uncontested superpower in the 1990s, and i don't think it's felt the need to bend

of these , about a third will fall on russia, that is, formally, the reduction in russia's quota will, but in reality, the reduction will probably be no more than 300,000 pairs, for whom such a decision is not beneficial. so this reduction in the volume of oil on the market for washington will not allow the us authorities to restrain the rise in gasoline prices, which have recently become very expensive. and this is highly undesirable for the biden administration. on the eve of the elections, the situation is aggravated by the fact that the united states decided not to sell any more oil from their strategic reserve, which had already been reduced to a minimum. dear friends, while our main release of the besogon tv program is being prepared on global topics, which we are used to talking about, i suggest that you talk outside the brackets on somewhat abstract topics, but which we are generally a wave of. hopefully it will be interesting too. i'm looking forward to you. see you. perm was. maybe i'm not a human factor. trouble will come for you. don't go for the stone. okay. no, it belong

the issue though, is that russia is not fighting just ukraine. russia is fighting nato and was fighting the united states. and yet, natal in the united states have very, very limited military power. they can actually project. all they can do is, you know, sort of like a drug pusher continuing to supply fentenol to some addicted attic like ukraine, and just continue to pump it in, hoping that they'll be able to come back and buy more product. but the reality is, ukraine's military capability has been eroded each and every day. it's not, we're not seen the, you know, the sudden arrival of fixed wing aircraft a rotary way or improved missile strikes are a lot more artillery. we're actually facing the situation where even the ability of the west, the nato, to resupply ukraine is ending. so ultimately, how this ends, militarily, it will end up with the defeat, not just of ukraine, but the defeat of nato. yes, and that's what i think has a lot of people nervous, and that's why they're so nervous about it here. essentially, same question, there may be praise in a little bit differently. the bi

well, i think russia is going to dissent itself, whether russia interprets or president put and interpret that to mean to, to, to actually use nuclear weapons, would be a descent into the kind of global barbarism those unimaginable in terms of, of human beings. so i can't say what i know is inside the head of president biden, but i can say that to pursue as though the implicit doctrine of both countries should now be made explicit to threaten, perhaps, imminent use of nuclear weapons should be. so beyond anything that is acceptable or imaginable that it doesn't happen. and yet, one of the horrible things that has happened this year, an ominous thing is that this threat has been made explicit by president. that is simply wrong. it's hard to say how wrong that is because the consequences are potentially so catastrophic for all of humanity. that said, we know that the doctrine of the us and the russian military both accepts and embraces the option to be the 1st to use nuclear weapons. we know that's the doctrine of both countries, extremely dangerous, that's bad enough. but to threaten as th

but i think the growth is very, very rough in russia. russia can sell the same to say, need, if they needed to make that, not so with europe and, and less so the u. s. can pretty much but, but europe not, and we're just thing start of it. i believe. 2023. maybe in the 2024, it's going to be much worse. was cause loss low rosalyn space a years he has successfully launched and goes telecommunications satellite, ang, those fat to from the bike or cosmo, drew with russia and go to agree design of the id said 2, indications suffer like 2 places. first attempt was lost or not, that was often annoyed failure. the satellites deployment was delayed by economic sanctions imposed on russia. anger sent to we'll provide communications either high speed internet access and go to for the next 15 years. its, i'm, his administrative information technology says the new satellite will improve the quality of life for the anger, new people we heard from some breast or about the recent success fall under the move. we were disappointed by the 1st satellite launch when we did not see results . the governmen

is in russia the missiles are not finished there, we will destroy all these ukrainians.that is, all those forces that russia previously said that we will do everything to destroy the ukrainian infrastructure, but of course the west sees that it is much more important and more adequate to clearly support ukraine and what is it in the end the common front will certainly be traditional statements and condemnation of these actions, but we see that the international situation is worsening and such an alliance of countries is being created that, for various reasons, support russia definitely china, which wants to use the economic resources of russia for its geopolitical strengthening, this is iran, which has existed for more than 40 years under sanctions. and it can also be said that the countries of the third world and traditionally have ties with russia , the same syria and caragua, and we are all we can see from yevhen sambori's vote at the un and for russia. i think this is such an argument that if we do not win, we can not defeat the ukrainians on the battlefield in an op

, and secondly, russia i would constantly ask him to remove these sanctions because russia has such anresting policy throughout this period when, on the one hand, they say that sanctions do not harm them in any way and everything is fine, on the other hand, on the other hand , they try to remove sanctions for any reason and these constant statements by certain representatives of russia that let's negotiate why mrs. matvienko said the same is based on their hope that the beginning of some negotiations between russia and ukraine will lead to the lifting of sanctions, even though certain countries there, the united states and great britain said that it will not be an excuse to remove the sanctions from you, that is, do not hope, nevertheless , russia has such a big real dream that you have. if these negotiations begin, then all the sanctions will be removed, but it seems that no one will remove them yet. even this is another hope of russia, which now begins already in the autumn-winter period, that is, the countries of europe will be forced to agree with russia on the dependence on the su

well, first of all, i would like to say very clearly that russia is not russia, there is no russia, let'ss is absolutely wrong, in the context, they did not move what came to us from russia, haida. and they are not russia, they are just trying to rewrite everything for themselves, this is such a thing. well, in general, according to some data, the word is tatar in general, that is, it could autonomously come to us er or even in very ancient times and autonomous to russia and from the tatars from some tatars to us from other tatars to russia, it is also not excluded, but philologists meet there, but not in words, that is, they are really russians, really determined for a genocidal war against ukrainians, i said it for a very long time. so when many did not believe it, but in fact it is so. why is this happening? it is very simple, very simple explanation, elementary explanation in russia. stone cave age when they devoured each other one and a half thousand years ago, it is possible even earlier in some areas 300 years ago and in our country, the stone age ended six thousand years ago, and

and russia's partners.hear it firsthand, because you and i, the allied forces, will not go to the ramparts from belarus, as e vsu claims. look, oh and uh, the president of belarus and the leadership of the power bloc have said more than once, we are not going to attack ukraine, but let's hear what everyone is saying about this interestingly. of the russian and belarusian combined forces, the activities of the russian and belarusian armed forces indicate a systematic preparation for an escalation, according to available information, officers of the armed forces of the russian federation take part in assessing the readiness of military units of the grodno, brest and gomel regions of the republic of belarus as a whole it was planned to assess the readiness of the western region to carry out combat readiness under the guise of training at the same time covert military activities, such as the movement of personnel of weapons and military equipment, military maneuvers, the restoration or arrangement of new milita

designed against russia. ok. that's why it's so it's existential for this useless outdated alliance. ok. they made it out to be or not to be. it's their fault and they're going to pay the consequences for larry. there they are. a mental operates much like fantasy war game or a video game in their own minds. they can accomplish a lot of things, but the reality is they don't have the, the truth strength, the actual number of soldiers that they can move quickly to the front. the 5, i was sort of surprised this last week with cbs news coming out and touting that the 104 borders in romania ready, ready to invade? no replacing. well, why did they arrived in june? so they've been there. they've been there at least 5 months. so now why all of the excitement and, and that boils down to the, the simple fact that with the counting the presence of the 100 and 1st airport, along with general david betray us now to call in for some sort of multinational force modeled after what went into a rock in 2003. these are signs of

or maybe it was russia that blew itself up, it blew itself up, russia went completely crazy .azprom published this, even pictures of 2016 , when under the gas pipeline system lies an american-made, in my opinion, explosive device, they said that they lost it during the exercise and lost it. so right under e under the gas pipeline. eh, so it's over. it does not matter a device that, in my opinion, was designed to destroy underwater worlds. listen, well, right now there is no photo, because the world media does not even broadcast. nobody repeats this. all this dies fed nowhere, not on the internet. there is nothing. this is also the use of a monopoly in the media in order to promote the necessary information and kill everything that interferes with them, but it's there. but everyone is silent. now there are no gases from these pipes in europe and in the near future there will definitely not be electricity prices are rising it has to be saved, but this is western europe, but about why chisinau was asked today in the dark by the president, he said he doesn’t know why, but definite

between russia and the west. and that's only point this continued bloodshed, that violence is to cement nato's right. to be the only power on the planet that gets to redraw maps and stage referendums. they call this right in the most abstract way. rules versus delicate them, with strategic security agreements, fly into the trash, shall we hear is the west defends in order based on rules. where did these rules come from ever seen these roofs? it's solid deception double already triple standards. it's easy to count on fools like russia is a 1000 year old civilization and it will not live by such false rules. the west uses suppression, exportation, and enslavement instead of democracy. the unipolar world, it is built is anti democratic, deceitful, and hypocritical, through and through up at that, stay with her washer enough is enough. this apparently is what nato cannot accept this. so b dns for a vote, a quantity. they believe that they are better than the rest of the world. superior . even exceptional. so say the

we're not in war, russia, but in fact, they aren't war with russia. they're sending all sorts of arms to ukraine that are killing people that are killing russians that have killing ukrainians that up the want to live under the kia regime. so nato is a party to the war, but, you know, now they're a little bit worried. because russia may just dispense with the niceties and just say, well, yeah, you are new to the war, whatever, no matter what you say. so i think, you know, sold timber wasn't, wasn't acting, he is truly jittery. he's truly nervous. and all those, you know, his real loss is of course in washington. obviously didn't give him good enough instructions because they don't know what to do now either because they're not really anxious to flight russia. and his speech friday, rather than put in claim the west was behind a this week's mysterious damage to the mills seaman gas pipelines running from russia to europe. the video in that ms. little negotiate with me just really the anglo saxons have not had enough with their sanctions. they've moved o

please tell me that russia after putin is territorially the same russia as it is now or not.this process has been going on for more than 100 years. dezontagration and erazlichnye processes within russia are not going anywhere and the crisis will be only and the russia that we know now and the russia that was before putin's invasion of krym before the beginning of the ukrainian war will not exist in the future thank you for your answer, i will remind our viewers from mykola polozov, a lawyer, was on the air. they obviously talked about russia and, unfortunately, about putin , but i have to talk about it. well, they tell me that she is ready to join me. my second interlocutor today is maria zolkina , an analyst at the democratic initiatives foundation named after ilka kucheriv. congratulations, ladies. maria, congratulations . thank you very much for joining today's program. i am waiting for your professional answers that will allow me to understand the questions that for me personally and for my viewers sometimes seem difficult to understand. i already have some with mr. mykol

have voted to join russia, joining russia, crimea staying with russia, leaving the rest of the ukraine and ending it. they are now present calling this war has been going on for several years. but i think over the last couple of weeks we've seen a notable moving of the goal posts and something that used to be off limits, at least for the state i'm talking about with industrial sabotage and industrial terrorism seems to be pretty legitimate or at least normalized by the strikes on the russian gas infrastructure, as well as, according to russian intelligence, previously undisclosed to tax on a nuclear plant power plant in the russian city. of course, why do you think we are seeing some check rapid escalation to essentially terrorist tactics at this point? of time, i think the u. s. in particular who's leading the charge here is getting desperate . i think they see rush, you're winning this thing. i don't think they want to allow russia to have a victory. and so yeah, they're now turning to terrorist tactics. i think the attack on the north stream to pipeline was the most dramatic. and i,

nuclear potential is outdated and it is dangerous for russia itself, russia itself, well, i ca n't say0%, there is a certain amount but yes, this is closed information but again well, from the official american summary, we can see that the bulk of the production charges is the end of the 80s, the middle of the 90s, and only individual elements - these are primarily the yaros missile complexes, they underwent modernization in 14-19 years. which just recently we saw used by russia in exercises, what about the political aspect? putin is ready for negotiations. such a message from the russian dictator was brought to ukraine by the leader of an african country . the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelensky, emphasized that similar statements about negotiations from putin, this is nothing but another trick that should work on russia's domestic audience. yes, this is the decision. and actually speaking, these communities that he told him. he told me, in fact, that's the conclusion. that i am ready for negotiations with president zelenskyy, it is necessary to respect any dialogue that, in prin

it doesn't mean we want to exclude russia forever, but this russia, putins, russia does not have a seat. the kitchen table. participants also have the opportunity to try their hand at a bit of virtue signaling themselves in preparation for their possible eventual integration into the block. ukrainian president vladimir zalinski, set the tone sort of a he note for the virtue signaling, if you will, when he beamed in via video link to ask for surprise, surprise, whole more aid yours. so that quote, russian tanks do not advance on warsaw or again on prague about the only tank. advancing on the e. u is the massive brakes truck full of cash that the west keeps sending to ukraine while european struggle to pay the bills. professional actors, zalinski is a tough act to follow for sure. but u. k prime minister list trust who citizens voted to lee lee, you showed up anyway to give zalinski a run for his money and the rush bashing department. nothing says democracy more than a liter showing up to address a block to better citizens voted to leave. trust must have figured that there will be a short

this is worked at russia. it says engages in and benefits from the present. russia would be better served by immediately and unconditionally ending and hostile. it is withdrawn from the entire territory of ukraine and refraining for, for the threat or use of force of any kind against ukraine or any other states. thank you. should have missed. i thank the representative of ireland for his statement and i'll give the floor to the representative of brazil. mr. president, that new start by thanking very dr. able for his briefing from 5 to 9 september. the part is the biological weapons convention, how the formal consultations in geneva, and the article 5 d w. c. in accordance with the procedures established at the review conferences of the convention. on the occasion, russia presented its concerns regarding alleged to be a logical, biological weapons developed jointly by the united states and the grain, you know, in your territory by christ. the part is to the convention. listen to the comments of the 2 countries

to russia. and i think it's no secret that it -- effusion has the ability to assassinate or in some ways to limit the ukrainian government, i think that's probably what he was trying to do in the first two days of the war. if that was possible for him, this is something that he would do. so ukraine faces the prospect -- of a very -- the loss of freedom in a really every respect i think in that sense, you can say for ukraine as well this is a next essential conflict. if you agree with those two assumptions, those two statements, there is an existential conflict for russia and ukraine simultaneously, it means that these countries are going to give it everything. they're going to push as hard as they can push. to stave off defeat or to achieve victory. this is not going to be some kind of-limited small-scale skirmish. when a country's dispute, little bit like india and pakistan have disputed territory in kashmir for the last couple of decades. but they're not gonna use their weapons against each ot