and after it did have knowledge of them, russia reached out to the united states to have a sort of joint clamped down on cyber crime around the world and did not receive a response. so for washington to think that it can get anything done at this international summit without inviting the key players when it comes to cyber technology around the world. while to me, it seems like little more than a pipe dream. dull quarter wrapping up the bulletin. i'm not a date, takes us to the break, but don't go too far as more great programs get there. start in moments and then collins here with all your very latest global use developments. goodbye. sees ah, as we've been talking about now for a few years, all the money printing and now investment leads to countries and economies just completely shutting down. that's what we're saying. when i see black america, i see part of my so when i was growing, young black america spoke to me. what a stride you did not have those who say black marsh magic is a movement we are importing from america. know nothing of who we are. i lived in a world where white lives

russia helped the united states to defeat the taliban. taliban was defeated by american and russian allies. but the united states dismissed russia help and said they would do everything themselves. same in syria. the syrian problem can only be settd by russia, turkey, iran and the west. hashem: their original players who have been playing a bigger role in those regions. now, theresa when it comes toa the u.s. threat perceptions, will this lead to a new focus on china as perhaps the biggest challenge facing nato in the upcoming years? guest: i think that is clear. they have been saying for quite some time that china is the biggest challenge. russia should be worried about china's weapons systems because they share a huge border. so although russia and china cooperate, it is a marriage of convenience because there are also tensions in that relationship. right now they are not talking about it, but china has felt that russia took advantage of them in the past and took over siberian territory. so there are boundary issues with russia and china

so there's a, you know, there's the united states can't be seen is allowing russia to dictate the terms to any nation now. and in this way, the united states is correct. i mean, ukraine is a sovereign state, and ukraine has him like to ah, it has every right to insist on it. so its own is a direction where wants to go. united states doug is right in saying that this is this, this is the case. the problem is, united states can't tell russia to do. i mean, that's, that's the big equation. it's not what i'm, you know, ukraine once. it's what russia is going to do. as result of this, there are consequences for actions and the united states and nato knows this. there's been a hesitancy on the part of both united states and nato to encourage ukraine joining nato because of the ramifications. i mean, one only has to look back to the spring when russia was a 100000 troops, or were surely overnight on the border with ukraine. something nato can't match and so there will be consequences. and then mr. pascoe said so and these are the consequences that could cause. busy ukraine is sovereignty, i'm

russia. we've ahead of the united states when france, italy, germany, them much. they like to have it better or cooperation reef, or russia, but not at the detriment to u. s. or, oh, e u relations. why? because or for example, of france as he's no own or m i t m bomb other own nuclear weapons, but germany does not have nuclear weapons where it behaves, but it cannot produce them each se, the share originally the u. s. and they depend on the american gra, umbrella, a. so they, they added a double truck position. they are a steel stick to nate, off of our security, and or to keep leadership. we've sat on undisturbed european countries war a suspicious of russia. at the same time, germany as an economic power. no perfectly that if you you were on germany wants to be strong economic, you know, the need russian on a cas a. so there is a defacto audience between germany and russia dumps of energy. so there's a very complicated world where you can have different audience. he's on a jo, strategic, or g o economic or a traumatic and oh, so you are a member states for a long

and i want to ask you another question about afghanistan. 20 years ago, russia and the united states, they cooperated to defeat our canada and to remove the taliban from power. 20 years later. now, in the aftermath of the american withdrawal, do you believe that counter terrorist talk ration between russia and the united states is desirable? is it possible? do you think we would still share some of the same goals in visa, the afghanistan that we did 20 years ago? the alumini? sure, a quantity risky, said i believe that counter terrorists corporation between russia in the us as more is not only possible is not only desirable. it is necessary from the garage when neither should go at e. latasha. this has been brought up very often and i am unfortunate that socially we don't have you in our audience with us today. but it's very clear that the threat seo now talked about is becoming less of a threat 3rd today compared to 20 years ago. and he and facts, we see that the threat is expanding. it is a global in the problem and upset tackle it effectively. we need to combine our reference hause

russia. united states has started to converge in a terrifying manner with the russia of the present., lies and conspiracy spread around to put the population in position of having no choice who governs them. crossroads in the united states, everything we have taken for granted is up for question. again this is something that i think is astounding from external observers, not just myself who came to the united states in 1989 and made lives for ourselves here and never expected this turn of events. >> you also write, trump seemed to look up to putin because of his wealth and admired how he ran russia like his private company. putin, simultaneously autocrat and reputedly super rich were elite of their own. this is the group trump wanted to see himself in, internationally very rich, very powerful and very famous. >> lost some audio there. >> can you hear me, fiona? apparently she can't hear me. hopefully we can get her back. her insights into donald trump in this book as a person are not being heavily emphasized in public discussions of the book. it's much more the policy aspects of what

then, the biden administration said that although these were not state sponsored attacks, most of them were coming from russia when the united states back when we're already coming from historically not, not sponsored by mistake, expect an action given enough information, but the thing is though, the kremlin initially was never even made aware of these attacks. and after it did have knowledge of them, russia reached out to the united states to have a sort of joint clamped down on cyber crime around the world and did not receive a response. so for washington to think that they can get anything done at this international summit without inviting the key players when it comes to cyber technology around the world. while to me, it seems like little more than a pipe dream on thanks very much for taking us through to our t correspondent on quarter records. amount of us workers quitting their jobs in china is under pressure buckling. in fact, housing market on a tricky in space for real, it's all ahead and boom bus by for the ah, a beautiful chilled ocean with on what it says. i'm middle august, also a 1000000000 slogan, noise in the

the continued operation into a time when russia and the united states was standing toe to toe when it was eventually decommissioned, the abandonment was total. you know, this is really quite shocking. you've got to remember that this is in the heart of this pristine wilderness. what is a, a wonderful environment, and yet all of this it's just effectively been dumped. and if you think this is bad, there's a lot worse on the other side of greenland. for a huge u. s. base was built into the ice cap and that one was powered by nuclear reactor. ah, on the top of the moon, below the surface of a giant ice camp, the united states army has established an unprecedented nuclear poet, arctic research center. construction on come said tree started in 1959. it was completed inside 2 years, housed up to 200 men in a network of tunnels who live to pretty much as they would above ground. officially a research station. it really was to launch nuclear missiles against the soviet union in the events of war. but it seem became obvious. the shifting greenland ice sheet made the site dangerously unstable a

as we look at the military situation the united states is facing today, what do you think the greatest military risk the united states faces, is it from russiaa, other places? gen. milley: i think it is china, and i have said that publicly many times. i think as we look to the future, and i think we are living in a historical epic, actually, where we are seeing the rise of a country that is unlike something we have seen probably ever before. it is one of the great historical pivot points we have witnessed, which is the rise of china. and from the reforms of 1979 and deng xiaoping up till today, which is, i guess that is what 41, 42 years or so, four decades, they have had an incredible economic run. and with that they've developed a military that's really significant. as we go forward over the next 10, 20, 25 years, there is no question in my mind that the biggest geostrategic challenge to the united states is going to be china. of that, i have no doubt at all. russia is important. not unimportant at all. russia has very significant military capabilities. north korea and iran are still there. terrorists are going to be around for quite a whi

the ration between russia and the west, and i know, you know, i have been working in the years. so i know the process, the just ration united states and nato, when they ended up with all the russia, how the united states was defeated by going to be and the, and the ross and i was in northern alliance. ok. they're not the same. just rational said that the same thing with syria, i'm sure that the group and all by russia, jo iraq and the work the came regional have been play a bigger political role in those regions. now, theresa, when it comes to us threats, perceptions now with china testing the hypersonic weapons is, is something which is going to lead to a new focus on china as perhaps the biggest challenge facing later in the us in the upcoming years. i think that's clear that they have been saying this for quite some time. the china is the biggest challenge. russia should be worried about china's weapon systems, because china is not part of any sort of non proliferation agreement whatsoever. and they share a huge border. so although russia and china cooperate, it's a marriage of convenience. there are also tensions in that relat

francine: north korea, russia, in the united states.cks, we don't know if they come from the military. can you make america feel good that we have cyber capabilities just as good as the ones attacking us, i assume nobody has better cyber capabilities than we do. is that fair? gen. milley: i would say that we are the world's number one capability in cyberspace, but i would also tell you that china and russia are very, very good, as well as many other countries. in terms of defense, when the internet and the cyber world first developed, people weren't thinking of it as a domain of war, in terms of setting up architectures that were robust for defense. those days are gone now. years ago we started working on that, and we have a long ways to go. but we need to make our critical infrastructure, our financial systems, for example, our electrical systems, and many other pieces of our national economy, much more resilient to cyberattacks, because our adversaries are very aggressive in cyberspace. david: you are about halfway through your four-y

saying not just for people from saudi arabia, but even like for know, are there parts of russia and united states and canada? yeah, it sounds a bit of flippant when we start to, to talk about the weather, but actually these things are quite, quite serious. so when we're talking about snow, essentially what we've got with, with snow risa is a very large accumulation of water stores frozen on the surface of the planet. and that then melts out. and that the planet surface is kind of used to operating in a certain way when we change it, change the so cover actually affects the way that the planet surface can accommodate. that's that type of behavior. so it is actually quite serious when we're talking about the changes in snow when we're talking about changes in, in frozen water. also what we're talking about in, in, especially out arctic russia is changes to the permafrost, permanently frozen ground in siberia and other places which is starting to, to mel felt. and that meltdown is having significant consequences or infrastructure for roads and buildings are laid down on what they think is, is frozen

europe should become just a minor part of the united states and the united states shall remain the early bird of superpower. and if the western europe and russia become into a partnership over economic change over energy supply, then europe gets new opportunities and a new world. europe is love any longer, completely dependent to the united states. so the america united america playing dia, politics to preserve their global leadership role as the only superpower. and they don't care about consumer prices and energy security. in europe, they care on their ah power. and that's the game giant. and so they, they are supporting the warranty ukraine they are attacking. and then she surprised russia. it's one strategy. and what we see is, is a part of that strategy let. so let's, let's talk more about this gas issue and what, what is going to a bit of a gas argument really. so no stream to the, the latest russian gas pipeline going directly from russia under the baltic into germany. it's basically completed now and they've just started putting gas just in the 1st section of his pipeline now. so it's not going to get to europe for a while. but there a

saying not just for people from saudi arabia, but even like for know, are there parts of russia and united states and canada? yeah, it kind of sounds a bit of flippant when we start to, to talk about the weather, but actually these things are quite, quite serious. so when we're talking about snow, essentially what we've got with snow is a, is a very large accumulation of water stores frozen on the surface of the planet. and that then melts out. and that the planet surface is kind of used to operating in a certain way when we change it, change the slope cover actually affects the way that the planet surface can accommodate. that's that type of behavior. so it is actually quite serious when we're talking about the changes in snow when we're talking about changes in, in frozen water. also what we're talking about in, in, especially out arctic russia is changes to the permafrost, permanently frozen ground in siberia and other places which is starting to, to mel felt. and that meltdown is having significant consequences or infrastructure for roads and buildings that are laid down on what they think is

of the mass unemployment in the united kingdom that i experienced in e sovi uon colpsed in russia united statesred around large scale manufacturing, steel, coal mining, auto manufacturing, and the same phenomenon happened of people losing their jobs overnight. >> you draw the parallels between russia and england, and the united states as well. one of the other parallels is the deep division especially here in the united states and something president putin exploited so effectively during the 2016 election. what impact does that have on policy making and what are your concerns if president trump does indeed run again? >> well, what we saw is of course, understandably when people have lost their jobs, the rise of political grievances out of their socio economic circumstances -- and that happened in all the three countries i wrote about in the book and i saw it with any own personal experience. when people are hoping that their lifestyle and their life circumstances are going to change, they're always looking for someone to change that, and if they don't have the wherewithal to do it themselves. w

transnational criminal ranch where organizations make it because countries got to find on china, russia, the united states, make it the ability for any nation to reach out and touch the people who are doing this. if you can start putting the fear of god and some of these, you won't make it go away, but you can. that's remember pablo escobar wasn't killing people because of the cocaine trade. he was killing people because he did not want to be extradited ac to the united states. we can talk about this all day, but unfortunately we're out of time cybersecurity expert mor good. right. thank you so much for your expertise today. you bet. and finally, it's relatively common in sports here in the united states for the winter of a major championship to be congratulated by the nations president. right? well, apparently the trend is spreading globally in the world of e sports after moscow base team spirit one daughter to world championship at the international 2021 over the last weekend. they were congratulated by russian president vladimir putin. himself burton wrote a message posted at kremlin dot, are you sayin

it will limit global warming in china, russia, the united states in different places on the planet.another of china will not. one of them is reaching net zero. as explained. arguably the most important people coming to glasgow. china is the role's biggest emitter in carbon in absolute terms. this country is still very much in the debt of dealing with the aftermath of decades of burning coal to fuel this phenomenal economic growth. but at the same time, it is now at the forefront of developing and manufacturing renewables like solar. also in scotland which has more to do with the threat of covid, he has not left the country. instead, china has committed to reduce its carbon emissions by 2030 and possibly in the fall. it wants to be net zero on emissions by 2060 but the big, big questions around the scottish tales will be when specifically will china start to reduce its emissions? what will the actual number be in terms of the peak and then after that, how quickly will china start to reduce the amount of carbon it is pumping out from cities like this in the... india remains the third

we didn't have the kind of economic interdependencies between russia and the united states that we clearly have between china and the u.s. with u.s. and china, it's a technological race. it's an economic race and a military race. with russia it was only military. now i would argue that while the economic interdependencies might help us stay away from cold war behavior, certainly in the recent weeks, we've seen a lot of pretty bad cold war behavior. we've just been discussing one, but there was also the prisoner swap with the release of the wawei executive, the threats against taiwan. there's a lot of cold war reminiscent behavior under way between both powers. >> donald trump talked about and focused on china quite a bit. do you think the chinese government has changed its approach towards the united states since president biden took office. do you think that they were going to pursue this weapon no matter what, if trump was still in power or not? >> oh, sure. weapons like this take years to develop. the u.s. has been working on hypersonics for years. the chinese have been working on hyper

mechanism that was created to allow china, the us and russia to coordinate over afghanistan at the time when the relationship between the united states and russia are very, very strained. and as you know, some notice will probably say it's not been as good or it's, it's, it's worth stage since the cold war between the 2. so they're very, very few mechanisms for them to talk directly. and this is one of those mechanisms . and the plus comes from having that ability to invite practice time because of its influence in galveston and other countries when the need is there for them to, to dialogue. it's not the 1st time they meet under this umbrella. in fact, i think this is the 4th time this year that they've met. the last time was on the 11th of august just before the fall of cable, where they meant to hear in doha. so the mechanism has been going on for some time . and the relationship continues. at the same time, it is clear that russia is not rushing to recognize the taliban government for a number of reasons. but the one most important reason is they need further guarantees as to the taliban. so going to to, to control terrorist grou

russia. the united states is started to converge in a rather terrifying level with the russia of the presidentme power, the lies, conspiracy theories that are spread around, the effort to basically put the population on track of having no choice about who governs them in the future. we are at a crossroads right now in the united states where everything that we have taken for granted, is up for question. you know again, this is something that i think is astounding from most ups external observers, not just people like myself who came in the united states back in 1989 amid lives ourselves here. i never expected this turn of events. >> you also write trump seemed to look up to putin because of his wealth, and he admired the way putin around the russia like his own private company. people like putin who were simultaneously -- superrich, where an elite of their own. this was the group trump wanted to see himself in, internationally very rich, very powerful, and very famous. can you hear me? can you hear me now, fiona hill? have we lost the connection completely? i'm not sure if fiona hill can hear

intelligence agent had such an impact that his personality would lobby the subject in both russia and the united states. the story also shows the expectation and determination of the russian military intelligence and how we've underestimated the capabilities in technology and science in general. as the former defense secretary james' lesson juror said at the time of the discovery he and enlisted it in 1985 and in his testimony he said the american complacency. the book also exposes the backlash of the persistence of prejudice throughout history basically the human cause of oppression though the self designed tapestry of truth he thinks he was also a dedicated scientist and was a resilient survivor. someone who knew the cause of oppression and an important point to make this is also a story that transcends the scale of soviet espionage and turns the readers to the attention that opportunism and bigotry blurred the vision of all that was happening regarding the soviet spy networks. for example they thought all members of the communist party usa had to be spies. he played a bridging to belong to a bowling

cannot address the issues around russia and some of the roll it may have had in some of the major cyber attacks in the last few years? >> the truth is, the united states believes a lot of the ransom wear is coming from russia or former soviet states and that the russians are either allowing it or behind some of it the idea if you are going to have a counter ransom wear meeting, you'll have to talk about how to counter the russians at pains suggesting, look, we have other venues in which we are in contact with the russians they are just not invited to this one officials also pointingto this lull we've seen to attacks and raising the question whether or not that is a result of terms the united states and russia came between biden and putin it may be some of the progress but they are not invited to this one, dom >> thank you for that. on the heels of all of that, let's check on stock futures you can see the holding pattern. the dow up by about 50 points. the nasdaq up about 57 trying to complete four straight losses at this stage key inflation deals taking on 1.57% that is slightly lower than we've seen. >> around the world, hong kong forced to suspend t

think we have to recognize that we're no longer in essentially a bipolar nuclear world. russia and the united states that was true and cold war days, there were smaller nuclear powers, china, britain, france, others. but in those days, if you are going to have arms control, it was, it was a bipolar negotiation today. and we read in the newspapers from commercial satellite overhead of chinese construction of hundreds of new ballistic missile silos, which are obviously being excavated to put in missiles carrying nuclear warheads. china's capabilities and the nuclear shield are expanding enormously. so what i've said consistently when i was in the government, but before that, and since i've left, if we're going to have new strategic weapons negotiations with russia, china has to be included. it makes no sense whatsoever to pretend that we're still living in the cold war. bipolar nuclear error. exactly, except that policy has gib lee moved to moscow in beijing together. us nato policy has moved moscow and b jane closer than ever as you know. i don't think it's us policy that's moving close together. i t