to connect those rutens with the inhabitants of eastern europe - the 21st, 15th, 15th centuries, thish serious science, in short, it is called anachronism, e.g. why is this being presented as a reason for pride, and bogdan khmelnitsky allegedly bequeathed: go ahead like the greats? what's the intrigue here? the rutens of the middle ages are really the inhabitants of western ukraine, the inhabitants of the golyachina. no historian can argue with this. so, simply, when we try to identify these ruthenes of the 14th, 15th, 16th centuries with the arutenes, that is, the gauls of the fifth century. you see, this results in a substitution of terms, and unscrupulous historians declare that adaak was the king of the russians, and what kind of russians could there have been in the century? europe , there was never peace here, everyone fought with each other , the steppe, fought with neighbors, residents of eastern europe and ancient russia, the princes fought among themselves constantly, therefore, if we also remember the history of the cossacks, we will see that there was never any there was n