lindsay graham pointed to some newly reported comments that hagel is said to have made at rutgers university a few years ago, that the state department was becoming an adjunct of the israeli foreign ministry. >> he said the u.s. state was the adjunct of the israeli foreign ministry office. i got a letter back from the senator in response, did you say that and do you believe that. the letter said he did not recall saying that. and he disavows that statement. >> eric: joining us is chris wallace. these xhechblts are coming out about the jewish lobby and iranian regime is legitimate and latest comment that latest one, what does it mean? >> if he never said it it doesn't mean anything. he said he didn't recall which is not a flat denial. you think you would recall it if you said something like that. this is a was in a age of cellphones and somebody has a record of it. if it turned out he said that, it mate be curtains for him. we don't have any indication he did say it other an blog post. that is the interesting things here, although the senators who blocked his nomination, first time to a defen

and another study from rutgers university says it's all about the lack of jobs. something like 37, 38% of american households know somebody that lost their job along with them. where's the growth plan, larry? where's the jobs plan? what are we going to hear in the state-of-the-union message on tuesday? >> we're probably going to hear the same thing we heard in the inaugural address. very little about the economy. we heard about global warming, about gender inequality. we didn't hear a whole lot about the number one issue on the minds of most voters which is the economy. the fact is timothy geithner as admitted, social security, medicare, medicaid and obama care are on an unsustainable packet. the republicans and democrats have not come together for any kind of meaningful reform following the fiscal cliff. people have a generalized feeling. they get their paychecks, they know the payroll tax holiday is gone. they're looking at this 2% gdp growth. negative gdp growth last quarter. they're not feeling very good. oklahoma's numbers are going down a little bit. >> the

. >> i am a student at rutgers university. john mentioned the large majority of americans support giving the president the authority to kill american citizens without charges or trial or to process. my question is, if you were identified as a threat by some nameless official in the administration, where you want to process? >> the issue is not -- [applause] john: i don't think there would name him. they might name me. >> the issue is whether we are in a war situation, whether we are operating under the war powers of the constitution or whether we are in a law enforcement situation. the to have radically different approaches. we killed tens of thousands of american citizens, maybe hundreds of thousands with no due process in the civil war, and it was the right thing to do. [applause] john: on that note we're out of time. >> you want to discredit a movement, defend the confederacy. go ahead. john: ambassador bolton. no more time left. thank you for joining us and taking these difficult questions. students, thank you for coming h

survey from rutgers university finds 60% of people who found work in six months settled for lower pay. these aren't jobs you can send a kid to college on or buy a house. president obama detailed his blueprint for boosting the middle class. the only new proposal was an old one, raising the minimum wage. >> let's declare that in the wealthiest nation on earth, no one who works full time should have to live in poverty and raise the federal minimum wage to $9 an hour. >> free action was swift and fierce. conservatives say, hey, that's a jobs killer. progressives say it lifts families out of poverty. the problem, you can't find studies to support just about any position. a study found the new minimum wage actually means fewer jobs for low-skilled workers but a study by alan krueger concludes minl mihm wage hikes dewpoint reduce employment for fast food workers in new jersey. a study from the chicago fed found every $1 rise in the the minimum wage increases household spending by $2,800 over the following year. but just this week, januaet yellin, the vice chair of the federal reserve said ra

. >> reporter: the doctor studies public perception of bio- engineered foods at rutgers university. >search shows if a product has that label consumers are less likely to buy it. >> reporter: the fda says it recognizes the strong interest consumers have in knowing whether their food was bio- engineered and encourages voluntary labeling. julie watts, kpix 5. the office? the paid for answeri >>> new at 6:00 tonight, we ask, should you get overtime for the work you do after you leave the office? the push to get paid for answering those e-mails from your boss. >> plus, you see them cutting through traffic right between cars. tonight the unusual move in response to lane splitting by motorcyclists. those stories and much more tonight at 6:00. >>> all right. 30 minutes away. but right now "cbs evening news with scott pelley" is next. captions by: caption colorado comments@captioncolorado.com >> pelley: tonight, in los angeles, a fired police officer allegedly turns his guns on the l.a.p.d. >> pelley: ben tracey has the story. john miller with more on the suspect. a blizzard in the northeast

. >> i am a student at rutgers university. john mentioned the large majority of americans support giving the president the authority to kill american citizens without charges or trial or to process. my question is, if you were identified as a threat by some nameless official in the administration, where you want to process? >> the issue is not -- [applause] john: i don't think there would name him. they might name me. >> the issue is whether we are in a war situation, whether we are operating under the war powers of the constitution or whether we are in a law enforcement situation. the to have radically different approaches. we killed tens of thousands of american citizens, maybe hundreds of thousands with no due process in the civil war, and it was the right thing to do. [applause] john: on that note we're out of time. >> you want to discredit a movement, defend the confederacy. go ahead. john: ambassador bolton. no more time left. thank you for joining us and taking these difficult questions. students, thank you for coming h

. >> i am a student at rutgers university.ned the large majority of americans support giving the president the authority to kill american citizens without charges or trial or to process. my question is, if you were identified as a threat by some nameless official in the administration, where you want to process? >> the issue is not -- [applause] john: i don't think there would name him. they might name me. >> the issue is whether we are in a war situation, whether we are operating under the war powers of the constitution or whether we are in a law enforcement situation. the to have radically different approaches. we killed tens of thousands of american citizens, maybe hundreds of thousands with no due process in the civil war, and it was the right thing to do. [applause] john: on that note we're out of time. >> you want to discredit a movement, defend the confederacy. go ahead. john: ambassador bolton. no more time

think once beach is going to change anything because there was a new report that came out from rutgers universitythe unemployment rate is almost 8 percent, but it showed that 23 percent of americans have lost a job sometime in the last four years. president obama's time in office. another 11 percent have somebody in there household lost a job. one-third of the american people who have lost a job as a result of this economic downturn since obama has been in office. one speech is not going to change their pessimism on the economy. lou: the very thought of a new address from this president on the economy and job creation with nancy pelosi saying that spending is not the problem as it calls for more spending, is there some point at which we become simply abused children? because this is becoming -- i mean, it's awfully tiresome. people were saying things that are fundamentally, empirically, demonstrably untrue and we look up and they are elected officials of our government. >> it's pretty extraordinary. nancy pelosi was basically just echoing sentiments from the president and self. reported in the "w

. >> i am a student at rutgers university. john mentioned the large majority of americans support giving the president the authority to kill american citizens without charges or trial or to process. my question is, if you were identified as a threat by some nameless official in the administration, where you want to process? >> the issue is not -- [applause] john: i don't think there would name him. they might name me. >> the issue is whether we are in a war situation, whether we are operating under the war powers of the constitution or whether we are in a law enforcement situation. the to have radically different approaches. we killed tens of thousands of american citizens, maybe hundreds of thousands with no due process in the civil war, and it was the right thing to do. [applause] john: on that note we're out of time. >> you want to discredit a movement, defend the confederacy. go ahead. john: ambassador bolton. no more time left. thank you for joining us and taking these difficult questions. students, thank you for coming h

. >> i am a student at rutgers university. john mentioned the large majority of americans support giving the president the authority to kill american citizens without charges or trial or to process. my question is, if you were identified as a threat by some nameless official in the administration, where you want to process? >> the issue is not -- [applause] john: i don't think there would name him. they might name me. >> the issue is whether we are in a war situation, whether we are operating under the war powers of the constitution or whether we are in a law enforcement situation. the to have radically different approaches. we killed tens of thousands of american citizens, maybe hundreds of thousands with no due process in the civil war, and it was the right thing to do. [applause] john: on that note we're out of time. >> you want to discredit a movement, defend the confederacy. go ahead. john: ambassador bolton. no more time left. thank you for joining us and taking these difficult questions. students, thank you for coming h

at rutgers university of 2007.o journalist bob woodward says while some senate democrats have asked the white house if hagel would withdraw, the answer has been no. the man who succeeded hagel in the senate will not seek re-election next year. republican mike johan of nebraska says he wants to focus on his family. mccain tells nbc most of his senate colleague colleagues wile to support a bipartisan gun control package that could include unver a background checks. "usa today" writes gun shoppe owners are reporting ammunition shortals in part because of reports that the government is making huge purchases for training purposes, and also over fears of new regulations in the newtown, connecticut, school shooting. the hartford current says police found thousands of dollars worth of graphically violent video games at the home of the young man blamed for the murders in newtown. abraham lincoln is making a difference, even today. we will tell you how later in the grapevine. up next, joe trippi and karl rove on the probabil

. >> there's a new report from rutgers university and really shows that the effects of the recessionare deeper and more wide-ranging than we thought. for example, unemployment rates, 7.9%. they found out that 23% of americans had lost a job sometime in the last four years, another 11% had somebody living in their house who lost a job. that's more than a third of americans who have lost a job in the last four years. when they asked, what do you blame for unemployment? the number one blame was cheap labor in foreign countries, and the second one was, illegal immigration taking american jobs. >> byron a lot of people say that illegal immigrants take the jobs that legal americans wouldn't take or don't want because they're in not high-paying enough. what say you? >> well, that is certainly an issue, and i have had republicans from border states say, look, go to a chicken processing factory, you're not going to fine a lot of 0 native born americans working. you're not going to hear a lot of english spoken. but there's no doubt that the presence of large numbers of low-skilled immigrants d

numbers. >> this is a serious study, it's not a study that they did for a newspaper, this is rutgers university to a thousand different people and what they're responding to is really this slow recovery that we've seen. in the past when we've seen a recession, usually you see the bounceback. we haven't gotten that this time because of the destruction in the housing market and destruction of the financial system. that's one of the reasons and as a result, the people they surveyed, 60% said they think that there has been some permanent change in the economy and another 30%, 29% said they don't think we will ever go back where we were in terms of the economy, economic growth, prosperity, home values. they don't think they're ever going to see what they saw before. it speaks to the pessimism out there now. >> and obviously, critics of the-- there have been a lot of tools put into play to fix this thing. huge stimulus package. health care that was supposed to, you know, sort of project the decline of health care costs over time and all of that was supposed to stimulate the economy. but we have also

vote there was a blog posting about a speech i think in 2007 or 2008 that chuck hagel made at rutgers university and the blogger was a supporter of senator hagel who was thinking about running for president and he put on his blog the next day 6 points of the speech question and answer is session and point six was allegedly senator hagel said that the u.s. state department was an adjunct of the israeli foreign minister's office which i think would be breathtaking if he said that to have such a view. i got a letter back from senator hagel in response to my question did you say that and do you believe that and the letter said he did not recall saying that and he disavows that statement. >> chris: is that enough for you? >> well, if in fact that is true, that would end that matter because he previously said in a book that the jewish lobby intimidates members of congress particularly the u.s. senate and makes us pushes us to make very bad decisions. if the second statement were true he said that the secretary of state's office is under the control of the israeli foreign ministers, those two together

>> there was a blog posting about a speech i think in 2007 or '08 that chuck hagel made at rutgers university and put on his blog the next day six points of the speech. question-and-answer session, and point six was allegedly senator hagel said the u.s. state department was an adjunct of the israeli foreign minister's office, which i think would be breathtaking if he said that. >> okay. so let's see if we're all on the same page here and have this correct. a right-wing website publishes a resumer from a blog based on something hagel may or may not have said in a speech over, count them, five years ago. and now sitting united states senators are demanding hagel explain himself. hagel provided ayotte and graham with a copy of the speech and notes he does not recall making any such statement. now, folks, this is a pattern for the new gop that maybe mr. viguerie is looking for. senator rand paul pushing a theory about moving guns from libya to syria. paul's theory can be traced back to glenn beck. michele bachmann accused hillary clinton's chief of staff of having ties to the muslim brotherhood.

. >> i am a student at rutgers university. john mentioned the large majority of americans support giving the president the authority to kill american citizens without charges or trial or to process. my question is, if you were identified as a threat by some nameless official in the administration, where you want to process? >> the issue is not -- [applause] john: i don't think there would name him. they might name me. >> the issue is whether we are in a war situation, whether we are operating under the war powers of the constitution or whether we are in a law enforcement situation. the to have radically different approaches. we killed tens of thousands of american citizens, maybe hundreds of thousands with no due process in the civil war, and it was the right thing to do. [applause] john: on that note we're out of time. >> you want to discredit a movement, defend the confederacy. go ahead. john: ambassador bolton. no more time left. thank you for joining us and taking these difficult questions. students, thank you for coming h

. >> jim, rutgers university.lots of economists, such as your friend, rudy from mit that you mentioned, are believers that competition is the hallmark of a country thriving and growing, including jobs, et cetera. lots of economists, even before the euro was instituted, argued that they needed europe more competition rather than, what, a coordinated currency, et cetera. and they predicted a bad woes for europe under the euro. you mentioned a lot of the problems on the flipside of competition, namely regulation. give us your perspective in terms of competition regulation in the euro and government coordination. >> i think it's a very good question. a lot needs to be done there. i think that at the time that the euro was put together, and my good friend, professor at columbia, nobel prize winner, had different views of what it was cold, how is going to work out, and what happened. that was not in his idea book. because you do tremendous regulation there, you need more the regulation. there's no doubt about it. in ord

>> guest: rutgers university in new jersey. c-span: when did you become a nurse? >> guest: i graduated from college with my degree in nursing in 1973. c-span: and where'd you go to college? >> guest: rutgers in new jersey, and have my bachelor's degree from there. i have my master's and phd in nursing from nyu. c-span: how old are your children? >> guest: i have a 20-year-old. we're becoming a real nyu family. he's a -- he's a junior there. he's going into his senior year. and i have a 12-year-old boy. c-span: how are you and your husband going about your next book? >> guest: well, we're deep in the middle of it now. he's in the philippines right now doing work. we're just dividing up the work in terms of the interviews. he's interviewing a lot of the men; i'm interviewing a lot of the widows and children of the men. i'll do a lot of the archival work, and he'll do a lot of the other work, other general library work. c-span: and what year is that coming out? >> guest: well, we hope it's--we hope to have a first draft done a year from december. c-span: the title, "

rutgers university did a study where they talked to a lot of people who had lost jobs and then regainedther jobs, and this is what they found, of the people 22% said that they are being paid the same as they were before. beyond that, though, look at this, 24% said they are paid more and 55% said they are being paid less. this is one of the great underreported stories of the economy, underemployment, and the people who work hard and trying to move ahead, and many of whom are middle-class, and just can't get any real traction here. this is the great challenge for this president, and not merely to produce jobs, but good jobs which continue to be in short supply. chris? >> tom, you make an excellent point. and not only looking at the big red section is that an obvious challenge, because when you look at underemployment you go from the 8% to 16%, which is a more formidable number, and it seems as though you should have a magic wand, tom, the way you move your hand and appear -- i'm new to cnn and that is impressive. you have to teach me how to do that. i have to go to the contributors van jo

rutgers university did a study where they talked to a lot of people who had lost jobs and then regained other jobs, and this is what they found, of the people 22% said that they are being paid the same as they were before. beyond that, though, look at this, 24% said they are paid more and 55% said they are being paid less. this is one of the great underreported stories of the economy, underemployment, and the people who work hard and trying to move ahead, and many of whom are middle-class, and just can't get any real traction here. this is the great challenge for this president, and not merely to produce jobs, but good jobs which continue to be in short supply. chris? >> tom, you make an excellent point. and not only looking at the big red section is that an obvious challenge, because when you look at underemployment you go from the 8% to 16%, which is a more formidable number, and it seems as though you should have a magic wand, tom, the way you move your hand and appear -- i'm new to cnn and that is impressive. you have to teach me how to do that. i have to go to the contributors van

jon: that was the rutgers university remark, rutgers speech? >> right. jon: thanks for clearing me up on that. byron york, from the "washington examiner". >> thank you, jon. jenna: a big story today, facebook hacked. a series of cyber attacks of the social networking site used by hundreds of millions of people. is your personal information at risk? facebook is responding with the latest. >>> four letters written by john lennon's killer about to go on sale online. who is selling them and why now? details ahead. i work for 47 different companies. well, technically i work for one. that company, the united states postal service®, works for thousands of home businesses. because at usps.com®, you can pay, print and have your packages picked up for free. i can even drop off free boxes. i wear a lot of hats. well, technically i wear one. the u.s. postal service®, no business too small. well, technically i wear one. try running four.ning a restaurant is hard, fortunately we've got ink. it gives us 5x the rewards on our internet, phone charges and cable, plus at o

. >> gin big slur, rutgers university. lots of economists, such as your friend, reborn bush from mit did you mentioned, are believers competition is the hallmark of a country thriving, growing, jobs, etc. and lots of economists, even before the euro was instituted, argue that they needed europe, more competition rather than coordinated currency to make center. the bad rose for europe under the euro. you mentioned a lot of the problems on the flip side of competition, namely regulation. give us your perspective in terms of competition, regulation and the euro and government coordination. >> i think it is a very good question. a lot needs to be done there. and i think that at the time that the euro was put together my good friend bob o'dell, a professor at columbia and nobel prize winner had different views of what it was going to @booktv was going to work out and what has happened. that was not in his idea but because you have had tremendous regulation there, indeed more. no doubt about it. it's going to get more competitiv

look at this study by rutgers university.54% of people who found work, unemployed people who found work, had to do so by settling for lower pay. how much lower pay? 34% took a pay cut up to 10%. 26% took a pay cut of 50%. the president needs to assure that the economy can strengthen. >> it will have to be about jobs, jobs, jobs, exactly what he will say and the spin is what people will be looking forward to. christine, thank you. we'll continue our conversation about the state of the union, coming up with gene sperling. and also washington -- wisconsin senator ron johnson is our guest. he will kill me because i said that. what does it take to be a "sports illustrated" swim suit model. a couple words come to mind. kate upton on the cover of "sports illustrated" swim suit issue. tells david letterman how tough it was. talk about that, straight ahead. you can spot an amateur from a mile away... while going shoeless and metal-free in seconds. and you...rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle

joining our table is stephen barnett, the director at rutgers university where he focuses on the economicsrd question, we think we know there's a $7 return but it comes from observational studies. we look at kids in head start. talk to me about the random assignment. what do those studies tell us? >> the $7 figure is actually from both kinds of studies. there are randomized trials that show $7 or more returns just as there are simple observational studies. there's two trial that is have cost analysis. one is not as high as seven, it's in the two to three two one range. we can't put a dollar value on it. i know that's my job as an economist, if your kid doesn't have an abortion it's important, but i can't put a dollar value on it. >> if you don't go to jail or don't end up pregnant when you don't mean to, they have a social good on the back end but we don't know if it's a $10 social good or $20 social good. you are a bit of a skeptic on the questions of early childhood education of this pre-k. >> having a 4-year-old daughter, i have it. my bank account would love for there to be universally

helen fisher is a biological anthropologist with the center for human evolution studies at rutger's universitycientific adviser to the internet dating site chemist chemistry.com, a division of match.com. helen good morning. >> good morning. >> lots to talk about, internet dating etiquette, sexting, female roles and courtship and marriage. it's doubled, friends with benefits. >> has doubled in the last year, in 2011, 20% of american singles had a friends with benefits relationship. >> friends they were smooching. >> well, more than smooching. they're going home and having a more -- >> it's more than smooching, brooke. >> but you know what's really interestings as an anthropologt it's the emergence of the pre-commitment stage in the whole courtship process. 45% of the people who had had a friends with benefits relationship actually had a relationship that turned into a long-term partnership. so it's as if singles are starting earlier with the sex to figure out who this person is and moving into a stage before it's long-term and serious. >> it's just happening now? >> that's what we see now. this