ruth krumbhaar versus san francisco public works. 428amatury loop. appealing the issuance on june 18, 2019 to gte mobile net of a personal wireless service facility. permit 18wr-0372. we will hear from the appellant first. >> thank you for being patient with us. four cases got off the books tonight otherwise you would be here for another two hours keeping us company. we love to be here. welcome. >> for clarification we are presenting together. >> you can share the time. you will have seven minutes to present and three minutes in rebuttal. go ahead whoever wants to speak first. >> there is a clock right in front. >> i am rhatany live at 2638 lion street with my teenage son. this is home to us and enjoyed by those in san francisco and tourists all day every day. i would like to highlighter a fact. the address is being used for installation is defective. 428amatury loop is two miles away from the location on lions street. you will see the location comes up. it is all that has used that address. verizon and the parties associated with us acknowledged the

ruth krumbhaar vs. san francisco public works, bureau of street use & mapping.the subject property is 428 amatury loop. appealing the issuance on june 18, 2019, to gte mobilnet of california, lp, of a personal wireless service facility site permit. construction of a personal wireless service facility in a planning protected location. permit no. 18 wr-0372. on august 28, 2019, the board voted 3-0-2 (commissioner santacana and commissioner tanner absent) to continue the appeal to september 18, 2019, so that the absent commissioners can vote on the matter. so commissioner santacana and tanner, have you had an opportunity to review the materials and video of the hearing? >> i have. >> yes, i have. >> thank you. for this case, since it is continued, we will hear at the president's direction from the parties. each party has three minutes each, no rebuttal, and there will be an opportunity for public comments. is ms. krumbhaar present? okay. >> hi, my name is cathy yu. i'm also an appellant. members of the board, we have submitted substantial evidence to you about the