ruth. and so, michael, i want to ask you about fact-checking. it was subversive and j.d.he first debate said, hey, no fact-checking, and that is the deal i struck, and then scott pelley saying, that it was the largest audience that was available to him, and the people who were not high supply on your disinfo, and trump passed because there would be fact, and fact-checking. >> yeah. what we have to understand is that authoritarians like trump not only think that they are above the law, but above the truth, and that ultimately it is their right to determine what the truth is. and to that end, they create a fabricated world, and anything that's going to puncture that world which is also, and they can come over time to believe parts of themselves, they become like megalomanics, and any of that part is punctured, it is viewed as real aggression, and early on in his presidency, trump said to a reporter "the fake news is creating violence," because they were asking too many questions and talking about lying on his behalf, right. so it is viewed as an aggression, and thus, aggres