we would be living in a state of nature where life is nasty, rutish, and short. anna: we would have no government, anarchy. mr. jefferson: it bears repeating. your constitution is not meant to limit your rights. if you are wondering whether you are allowed to do something, do not look to your constitution to find if you have permission. if your government is wondering whether it has permission to do something, it has to look at the constitution and show where it is written to allow them to do that. you look at laws that are passed to see what you are not in what you are allowed to do. if you do not have a constitution, perhaps there would be chaos. i think people would still gather together and work together in small societies. however, the bigger threat would be your government would see no limitations to its power and would become over powerful, worse than a monarchy. you would have the old roman dictators. you have tyrants, at radical government with no limitations on power. anna: a student question. mr. hamilton, could you sing for us? mr. hamilton: i know th