tom rutledge or pat -- could make those decisions based solely on what they think the market wanted the cost of infrastructure, engineering, and because the regulatory costs are low, they can spend more money on regulatory -- network things. rate for example, i respect the chairman talking about not regulated rates, but value rates are subject to reasonable review, whether you like it or not. you can be sued in court in a class action case over your rates. so when your team brings you a price you have a duty to ask yourself, is this price going to be legal? right now we have no idea because the commission has not said yet. you have to decide, what you're going to put in a market or not. it is the day today. i am frustrated with, people who talk about, companies will not invest, they are not going to stop of course not. all business decisions -- and the historical truth -- proof, exceeds the proof that it doesn't. we can argue about investment depression under title ii and i would have examples. it has not been a history of a regime that promotes expenditure of capital, or risk-taking, o