this ruzlution isn't recognizing the great [inaudible] that exists now to reaching the 1971 staffing level. we have had a lot of retirement in the police department and the aggressive plan we had with the police academy classes is about get toog the 1971 number. it doesn't make any sense to be lichting the cap on 1971 number that we have to demonstrate how effective that 197 1 number is. we base that on anecdote aal date data. it doesn't add up to conclusion we need a larger police force. this resolution isn't about next years budget it is about tying the plans of a city on a [inaudible] approach to setting police staffing levels based on pop ylthss. basing staffing level on population growth ignores the factors that contribute to public safety cht this ruzlution ignores a large body of evidence and i would like togo over some of that now. my staff member jermmy pollack is here. i also propose a alternative resolution which calls to question how ready we are to set a [inaudible] what police staffing should be. starting off, there are other reasons for establishing or established a mu

i will be supporting some of the amendments but i will most definitely be voting against this ruzlution and think if this resolution passes we'll have egg in our face here in city hall and i think it is actually sad that that is how we want approach this. at a minimum we should continue this if we are not sending it back to committee but i want to be on the record saying this isn't just a mistake, but one of the graveest mistakes we will have made if we go forward with this. >> supervisor avalos >> we have amendments i believe that i think we can vote on those now if we could. i would like to go one by one and then i have a amendment as a whole i would like to do >> so based on the amendments that i proposed if you look at page 2 line 16-21, those seem to be the items that you have concern with and if you look at the further resolve clauses on page 3-lines 18-25 and on page 4 line 1 and 2, it seems as though those are the ones you with willing to support so maybe we can-no. okay. >> i'll explain. the first where asclause where the 15 study [inaudible] average 271 police officers per 100

by the director of department of building inspection included in the report contained in item 60 ruzlution to approve the report of delinquent charges for cost for code enforcement violations and fees perstudents various section of the building codes >> todays committee is conducted to hear public testimony on a report of delinquent charges for assessment cost submitted by the department of building inspection. for delinquents charges [inaudible] at this time let's open up the hearing. first we'll hear from the department and before we have a presentation are there questions? okay, department of building inspection >> good afternoon presidents breed and member oz thf board. this is 21 year the department has come before the board requesting special assessment cost. alan daveson senior housing inspection. previously transmitted to you is report of delinquent charges dating june 30, 2015. the department ha2 inhouse hearing to discuss outstanding fees. the department appreciates your support in approving the delinquent charges for a useful tool for regaining fee frz the department. i also lik

by the director of department of building inspection included in the report contained in item 60 ruzlution to approve the report of delinquent charges for cost for code enforcement violations and fees perstudents various section of the building codes >> todays committee is conducted to hear public testimony on a report of delinquent charges for assessment cost submitted by the department of building inspection. for delinquents charges [inaudible] at this time let's open up the public hearing. first we'll hear from the department and before we have a presentation are there questions? okay, department of building inspection >> good afternoon presidents breed and member oz thf board. this is 21 year the department has come before the board requesting special assessment cost. alan daveson senior housing inspection. previously transmitted to you is report of delinquent charges dating june 30, 2015. the department ha2 inhouse hearing to discuss outstanding fees. the department appreciates your support in approving the delinquent charges for a useful tool for regaining fee frz the department. i a