let's listen to what ryabkov said. no, not planning.clear weapons have been deployed on the territory of belarus as part of countering the increasingly aggressive and dangerous activities of the us-led north atlantic alliance. the drawing of the line by this alliance led by the usa on the task of russia's strategic defeat will be extended. practices of nato's joint nuclear missions and much more. our joint decision with minsk to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in belarus is determined by the line of collective action. is it possible to conclude from these words, mr. volodymyr, that russia with all these nuclear threats and everything has simply taken three steps back, because the leaders of this countries have said something. what will happen to them if nuclear weapons are used? well, the leaders were told back in the 22nd year, and then the intensity of swinging this club stopped, but it seems to me that the ukrainian side now , as part of establishing a certain nuclear balance, so to speak, makes sense to invite the deployment of the

with a nuclear club, and now deputy minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation sergey ryabkovrussia allegedly does not plan to deploy nuclear weapons in other countries. let's listen to what ryabko said. no, not planning. the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus was carried out as part of countering the increasingly aggressive and dangerous activities of the north atlantic treaty organization . with the united states, drawing a line by this alliance led by the united states on the task of russia's strategic defeat, expanding the practice of joint nuclear nato missions and many other things. our joint decision with minsk to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in belarus is determined by the line of collective action. is it possible to conclude from these words, mr. volodymyr, that russia, with all these nuclear threats, has simply... taken three steps back, because the leaders of this country were told something about what would happen to them if they used nuclear weapons? well, the leaders were told back in the 22nd year, and then the intensity of swi

nuclear club so much, and now the deputy minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation serhiy ryabkov allegedly does not plans to place nuclear weapons in other countries. let's listen to what ryabko said. no, not planning. the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus was carried out as part of countering the increasingly aggressive and dangerous activities of the us-led north atlantic alliance. drawing a line by this alliance led by the usa on the task of strategic defeat of russia, expanding the practice of joint nato nuclear missions and much more. our joint decision to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in belarus is driven by the line of collective action. is it possible to make these words? conclusion, mr. volodymyr, that russia, with all these nuclear threats, has simply taken three steps back, because the leaders of this country were told something, what will happen to them in the event of the use of nuclear weapons? well... we were told back in the 22nd year, and then the intensity of swinging this club stopped, but it seems to me that the ukrainian sid