ryan patterson here in the city. the proposed ordinance before you implicates core constitutional interest and it likely constitutes a taking of private poverty without compensation in violation of law. as you've heard today, it would amount to a radical down zoning of the city. displaced growth and traffic and other communities will occur as well as other ceqa impacts and i'm a land use attorney and people should not need a attorney just to get a building permit. the rules should be simple and easy to understand and easy to apply. penalties should be commence -- it just just enough. so, i think we're to the point in the conversation where we should be considering alternatives. so i think there are some good alternatives we can credit and and the interest and that can be done pretty simply by redefining what a demolition is under the code. it's allowing more housing not less. if we're trying to penalize the defenders, we can do that under the existing laws and it will be more effective if the laws are clarified. the