ryan patterson, you are a mute . >> good morning president mccarthy and commissioners, this is ryan patterson. our officerepresents the property owners and i wanted to offer an update on the compliance process . we have brought together a top-notch team of design and safety professionals to help with this. the team is entirely new but after the discovery of these problems and with no prior involvement with the project submitting construction which i think is important for the independence and trust. we are cooperating completely with d.b.i. and other city agencies and the resolution of d.b.i. is awaiting planning approval for pending applications with a planning commission hearing scheduled for september 9 . we are recommending to the city attorney and neighborhood groups and the owner has signed a settlementagreement on june 30 . we've also filed a request an additional pre-application meeting with both d.b.i. and sffd. i appreciate staff's time and this has required a greatdeal of staff time in these last few years. i'm happy to answer any questions . >> is there another public comment? >>

. >> good afternoon, commissioners, this is ryan patterson. and if we can please have slide one.and i'm unable to see it. it looks like, there we go. ok. the cottage was not identified during environmental review and as a result, the historic impacts were not properly mitigate. building may even be individually eligible except for the project sponsor's own substantial unpermitted alterations. these historic features should be restored not ignored in further degraded. this is a series oversight. the cottages height was identified as a character defining feature in the h.r.e. yet the project would increase the height and mass destroying the charter defining feature and substantially altering the building form. this is clearly inconsistent with the standards for rehabilitation historic buildings. >> commissioners, my name is toby and i'm the architect that helped the roccos in their remodel of the neighboring into their family home. our approach 10 years ago was to model within the existing envelope and for the neighbors. slides four, please. is further exacerbated by this change in

. >> good afternoon, commissioners, this is ryan patterson. and if we can please have slide one.and i'm unable to see it. it looks like, there we go. ok. the cottage was not identified during environmental review and as a result, the historic impacts were not properly mitigate. building may even be individually eligible except for the project sponsor's own substantial unpermitted alterations. these historic features should be restored not ignored in further degraded. this is a series oversight. the cottages height was identified as a character defining feature in the h.r.e. yet the project would increase the height and mass destroying the charter defining feature and substantially altering the building form. this is clearly inconsistent with the standards for rehabilitation historic buildings. >> commissioners, my name is toby and i'm the architect that helped the roccos in their remodel of the neighboring into their family home. our approach 10 years ago was to model within the existing envelope and for the neighbors. slides four, please. is further exacerbated by this change in