rydzik, or someone else? or such a ukrainian rydzik. yes, i am afraid of it. it's cool, but how to build that narrative, because we understand that the political elites want to rule, and not engage in such small matters, where money and influence are not involved. but that's what we are for, you and i, to offer other versions of the view on polish history, on polish modernity, and on polish-ukrainian relations, that's what we're here for, the polish side dominated for a long time such ignorance about the ukrainian subject, and gedroyets has a great merit here, because he showed both ukrainian perspectives and texts, and ukrainian texts, then... we in poland had very little of that, we only really started to discover it only at the end of the 80s , but it is priceless, sixties, ukrainian writers, such as andruhovych, zhadan, historian hrytsak. we suddenly heard a completely different voice of ukraine, and it is a voice that fascinates, interests and commands respect, great respect. i agree, but you know what i'm afraid of, village zhadana does not listen, the v

someone, the occupation government, the occupation administration, or someone else, or such a ukrainian rydzikam afraid of this, i agree, cool, but how to build that narrative, because we understand that the political elites want to rule, and not to deal with such small matters, where money is not involved, but that's what we are for, you and me.

because otherwise it is his who will build rydzik or someone else? or such a ukrainian risk.yes, i am afraid of it. i agree. actually, how to build that narrative, because we understand that the political elites want to rule, and not to deal with such small matters, where money and influence are not involved. but we are there for that, you and i, to offer other options for looking at polish history, at polish modernity and at polish-ukrainian relations, we are there for that, and on the polish side for a long time there was such ignorance about ukrainian topics, and there is a big the merit of the hedroite: because he showed ukrainian perspectives and texts, and ukrainian texts. we in poland had very little of it, we only really started to discover it only at the end of the 80s, but it is priceless, the sixties, ukrainian writers such as andruhovych, zhadan, historian hrytsak. we suddenly heard a completely different voice of ukraine, and it is a voice that fascinates, interests and commands respect, great respect. then they will look at you as a person from another planet, b

or someone else, or such a ukrainian rydzik, yes, i ’m afraid of that, i agree, it’s cool, but how tod that narrative, because we understand that the political elites want to rule, and not engage in such small matters, where money and influence are not involved, but that's what we are here for, you and i, to offer other options for looking at polish history, polish modernity and polish-ukrainian relations, that's what we're here for. on the polish side , such ignorance about ukrainian prevailed for a long time topics, and here there is a great merit of gedroyets, because he showed ukrainian perspectives and texts, that shot revival, it was a beautiful book, and it did it. we suddenly heard a completely different voice of ukraine, and it is a voice that fascinates, interests and commands respect, great respect. then they will look at you as a person from another planet, but they once looked at shevchenko as well, and shevchenko became a national hero, a symbol. similarly, in poland, mickiewicz wrote that he wanted his books to become public property, but they did not then. ago it alway

rydzik, or someone else? or such a ukrainian radish. yes, i am afraid of it.ool, but how to build that narrative, because we understand that political elites want to rule, not engage in such matters, small, where money and influence are not involved. but that's what you and i are for, to offer other options for looking at polish history, polish modernity, and polish-ukrainian relations, that's what we're for. on the polish side , for a long time, there was such ignorance regarding the ukrainian subject, and here there is a great merit of gedroyc, because he showed both ukrainian perspectives and texts, and ukrainian texts, so... that shot revival was a beautiful book, and it was done by gedroyc. we in poland had very little, we just started it was actually discovered only in the late 80s. but it is priceless, sixties, ukrainian writers, such as andruhovych, zhadan, historian hrytsak, zhadan, historian. we suddenly heard a completely different voice of ukraine, and it is a voice that fascinates, interests and commands respect, great respect. i agree, but you kn

rydzik or someone else? or such a ukrainian radish. yes, i'm afraid of that. i agree. it's cool, but how to build that narrative, because we understand that the political elites want to rule, and not engage in such small matters, where money and influence are not involved. but we exist for that, you and i, to offer other options for looking at polish history, polish modernity and poland . but it is priceless. sixties, ukrainian writers, such as andruhovych, zhadan, historian hrytsak. we suddenly heard a completely different voice of ukraine, and what a voice it is fascinates, interests and provokes. it will be a problem, but it largely depends on us, who will take whom by force, force of thought, force of arguments and force of hard work, we will see, nothing is known, for sure, but we have chances, we have received enormous opportunities from quite a lot, of course, this is tragic opportunities because the war created them. putin's brutal bandit attack on ukraine. but on the other hand, it showed the possibility and the polish reaction. i must say that i was impressed