s. marshall and brock. lori is a lawyer, host of the brock, lori radio show, and author of atheism kills. welcome to you both. thanks for coming on gentlemen. brooklyn. let's start with you. there been a number of reasons given for the massive spiking and crime stat nationwide, from more people carrying guns, guns, and gangs, as, as the one chief said in new york to the ongoing cove in 1900 pad, then it calls for the funding. the police, what do you think is causing the increasing numbers? right, well, sometimes the simplest answer is you say the right one and, and i think it's because they've been demonizing that please. they've asked for the funding of the police. but it really is about the attitude toward the police. and because of that, we've got a whole new culture that has developed. we have a complete new culture where you decide that you can go ahead and rob a store for merchandise up to $950.00. and that's ok. well, i think that's partially responsible. it's not majorly responsible for the increase

s. marshal matthew fog. thank you so much for joining me. my good to be with you . so what do you think of this idea is actually paying a criminal to commit a crime? the solution to the problems we're seeing in the streets today? well, you gotta do something and it seems like it's working. i mean, when you're on the, on the surface i what is there? but i'm seeing that it appears to be some results when you look at california some the other states that are trying it i think they also need the racket back when you want growth. you know, get simply just on people in depth because they got growth. i mean, i think that the less that we take the profit out of it that's going to have made to impact when it's the same way to deal with. but if you can come up with something for right now, that is, is that miss ring and some of these guy that the like they have by and maybe that will help the stock, some of the murders and some of the assault when people knew that they couldn't go to the police for my wrong drug and stuff like that. so that seems to be like it's doing somethi

. >> 's resistance to the soviet invasion has marshaled the energies of a whole population.ng odds. and those who have witnessed this struggle are marked forever but they have seen. >> as far as i could ascertain the afghans are definitely convinced as long as there is just one russian invader on the afghan soil and as long as there is one free afghan there will be no peace in afghanistan. the price to pay for the freedom of 1 cent is to fight and die on the field. afghan people like others love their freedom. they live free and they die free until now they preserve the freedom of afghanistan with the price of their own blood just like their fathers did. i am sure the afghan people will regain it is in afghan tradition to fight against any kind, right now they are the soviets. the reaction against them shows the soviets are not seeing progress for the soviet argument is we are coming to free these people. but what does this mean? can one come to free people with tanks, with cannons by bombing villages, killing children, killing old people? killing the innocent? i mean what k

s much. where is an air marshal when yo need one, but here is the thing.he fda has had 3,715 complaint of unruly passengers like this guy and they are now charging people. violation fee of $35,000. the next time you wanted to bac a few too many in first class, don't. >> was at the fda or the faa? or as the fda now regulating th airlines? >> always have to be there to stab it to me. i have a solution. they need more emotional suppor animals in the airwaves, maybe we could start with a python or a hungry lion for people like this guy. there is a term that is come when describing hispanics, people use this term. it's awful hard as well to get. >> now, when certain parties us this term, it sounded a little different. >> after its main graduation it is holding ceremonies for black students at the end of april. >> most hispanic americans agre with me, laura, can get a new gallup poll finds they prefer the term, hispanics or latinos. i thought that was kind of, i liked it, it was kind of exotic. i don't know what i was thinking . sphinx, minx,. >> we don't have,

claire marshall, bbc news, gloucestershire. one of the bbc�*sarted reporting from russia some 20 years ago — has been expelled from the country — because she's considered by the authorities to be a threat to national security. sarah has now been told she can never return to russia — a decision which the bbc says is a �*direct assault on media freedom'. what follows is sarah's own account of her departure from moscow. this was the moment i discovered i was being expelled from russia. according to a specific law, i've been designated a "threat to national security" and as such i'm not allowed into the country. man speaks russian pulled aside at passport control, i was told the fsb security service had banned me for life. i recorded the conversation. i was returning from belarus, where i'd confronted alexander lukashenko on the mass repression and torture of peaceful protesters. his loyal supporters rounded on me... ..in a coordinated attack. vladimir putin's presenting this as just another working visit. .. i've reported from russia for two decade

s and you do see that same stitching style that you see in marshall's work. it looks like we have a couple of questions. howard you did an amazing job and it's going to mean more conservation in the future so what do you expect the next round of conservation will focus on? >> well, it's kind of interesting. one of the main ethos of conservation is trying to make things as reversible as possible so this constant improvement in techniques and materials and certainly when i look back at the conservation and the description what of what was done in 1962 and they added formaldehyde and certainly things like its we wouldn't even think about doing things like that today but hopefully this latest round of conservation will last for a long time. i think a lot of it will eat preventive conservation and not moving it to much and making sure it is well supported and well housed going forward, what it is. i really don't know. i think the materials being used this time around will last for a long time so there is going to continue to be a breakdown of the regional silk jus

s&p. the other part has to do with china. a lot of negative rhetoric coming from investors on china. paul marshallne of them, saying china is now on investable -- now un investable. overall, we are down something like 30% since the beginning of the third quarter. a real fund reversal from where we were just six months ago. guy: it is amazing to see just how quickly the politics has changed the economics around what is happening with these companies. european stocks are quite geared to that china story more broadly, and have been on quite a run recently. bloomberg tv speaking to a number of market watchers on how they are thinking about how much longevity there is left in this trade. >> earnings revisions have been super positive. so in fact, valuations can come down. >> the fact is we have incredibly strong corporate earnings. >> my view is that we have seen all-time highs in european equities, but it has been accompanied by upgrades to earnings expectations for this year, and also for next year. >> the earnings revisions have been super positive. so in fact, valuations have come down. >> i expect

the german marshall fund is a us think—tank promoting cooperation and understanding between north america and europe. andrew small is is a senior transatlantic fellow gmf�*sou very much forjoining thank you very much forjoining us. thank you very much forjoining us. tell us about the extent of china's involvement in afghanistan? although the are involvement in afghanistan? although they are described _ involvement in afghanistan? although they are described as _ involvement in afghanistan? although they are described as the _ involvement in afghanistan? although they are described as the largest - they are described as the largest investor in the country, in many ways this is on paper. they have committed large—scale investment, committed la rge—scale investment, significant committed large—scale investment, significant commitments to a copper mine investment and oil investment in the north but in practical terms, it has been extremely difficult to get these projects in motion. essentially they have been mothballed. china is waiting out the situation in which there is sufficient stability to be able to make these investments viable. for now they set their

s airport that remains the focus for british soldiers and the government. the taliban says one minister are making that a little easier than it was. they appear to now be marshalling us evacuation and for the uk evacuation and that is making a big difference to the size of the crowds outside the uk gate and allowing us to process people much more quickly. thank you all. i mean, we are overwhelmed by this response. _ this is the welcome some of the afghan families who have made it to the uk are receiving. right, shower gel, - i have got another box. a synagogue in hertfordshire, collecting donations. ia lot of us have families where thisl actually happened only 80 odd years ago and they literally left - where they were, with the clothes on their back, so it is our turn to now be the people to help. young lives prepare for new lives here. the future of the country they called home, so uncertain. chris mason, bbc news. let's return to kabul tonight, and speak to our correspondent secunder kermani. there has been so much focus on kabul, what do you know about what is happening in other parts of the country? pm is happening in other parts of the count ? �* ., _ is happ

the german marshall fund is a us think—tank promoting cooperation and understanding between north america and europe. andrew small is a senior transatlantic fellow of the gmf�*sitted large—scale investment, significant commitments to a copper mine investment and oil investment in the north but in practical terms, it has been extremely difficult to get these projects in motion. essentially, they have been mothballed. i think china is waiting out the situation in which there is sufficient stability to be able to make these investments viable. for now they sit there dormant, waiting for a situation when that is possible. i think china is willing to make investment in scale and make afghanistan a central hub for a lot of their infrastructure investments in the region, but are extremely concerned about the security situation, notjust now but for the last decade. they still will be for some years to come, so i think the chinese economic role there is still quite tentative and more talked about than something that translates effectively on the ground. so how does the rise of the taliban, the re—emergence of the taliban fit into that picture for china? china has had

s airport that remains the focus for british soldiers and the government. the taliban says one minister are making that a little easier than it was. they appear to now be marshallingevacuation and for the uk evacuation and that is making a big difference to the size of the crowds outside the uk gate and allowing us to process people much more quickly. thank you all. i mean, we are overwhelmed by this response. _ this is the welcome some of the afghan families who have made it to the uk are receiving. right, shower gel, - i have got another box. a synagogue in hertfordshire, collecting donations. ia lot of us have families where this| actually happened only 80 odd years ago and they literally left - where they were, with the clothes on their back, so it is our turn to now be the people to help. young lives prepare for new lives here. the future of the country they called home, so uncertain. chris mason, bbc news. i�*m joined now by peter galbraith, former un deputy special representative for afghanistan and former us ambassador. great to have you. we have just heard in that report, tony blair calling the us decision to withdraw imbecilic. how fair is that? i callin

marshall who presided over the trial. and who was not going to let thomas jefferson get away with any sloppy prosecution. for treason s. under the constitution treason is very narrowly defined. it consists of waging war against the united states or abetting those countries at war with the united states and it has to be witnessed by two eye-witnesses. well, the prosecution couldn't get the eye-witnesses because the stuff that burr was said to have done actually happened when burr was far away. and secondly, there was no war. and marshall ruled on this that he instructed the jury, you have to acquit. well, anyway, i can't tell you the rest of the story, because i want you to read the book. in fact, i'm going to stop there, and ask questions. i see you have questions. and by the way if you have answers to questions i've thrown out i'm happy to listen to those. if you have questions raise your hand and since cspan is in the back i will repeat the question. yes, sir. okay. the question is how about the suffer jets. here's a basic problem. i write books for the purposes of expanding knowledge of history and i will say quite

marshall is in office as the chief justice for 34 years or so. so he is the last founder in that he is continuing to have a impact into the 1830's where hamilton is-- excuse me, madison is out of-- so franklin dies in 1790 and washington dies in 1799, doesn't see the new century. and hamilton is killed in a duel in 1804 and famously adams and jefferson die on july 4th, 50th anniversary of the kek declaration of independence. marshall is in power and what is he doing? he's vindicating marshall vision. he's caring for the continentalist flag of george washington under whom he served at valley forge. if you were at valley forge with washington and hamilton, as marshall was, you understand we need money, we need to support the troops, if we don't, we're dead. adams wasn't there. jefferson wasn't there. madison wasn't there, they don't feel it in their bones the way marshall does. he's a nationalist and carries forward the vision. he has immense respect for washington, he was the biographer. hamilton was a brilliant lawyer and he used hamilton's legal ideas about the banks and many other things and within other thing he does. he's a nationalist figure

begin to marshal our resources and our people to fight against it and you touched on this moment ago one of the big issues ransomware which we saw with colonial pipeline hackers targeting u. sitical infrastructure operators here what is the solution to stopping that and how does the u s government really factor into all of this? because you have the government and you have private business at the same time, right for us. you know we always tell people it's really about three steps the first step is you need to be able to protect yourself from a cyberattack whether you're the smallest business, an individual or the largest bank or the largest tech company in the world. you're going to be attacked it's a question of when not if, and so you need to have protection put in place you need to back up your infrastructure so that then second when you detect you're able to then take the 3rd 3rd step which is to recover and so once you've done that what the government is really trying to do now is put in place sort of best practices so that you don't have to start from scratch you don't have to come up with this. answer yourself. you can really follow the standards the government star

marshal and grassley, i wrote to dr. collins asking him to open up the books on the n.i.h.'s relationship with chinese researchers. and, mr. president, i ask unanimous consent to submit the record -- the letter for the record. the presiding officer: without objection. mrs. blackburn: this letter asks dr. collins about news reports that chinese researchers were allowed to delete data from a genetic database managed by the n.i.h. the data they removed included information about the novel coronavirus that caused the covid-19 pandemic. dr. collins has not responded to the letter, but this isn't the sort of allegation the n.i.h. will be able to ignore into nonexistence. we need a response. we need to know what happened. we need transparency from the n.i.h., just as the n.i.h. is asking for transparency from china. dr. collins must reveal what definition of gain of function research n.i.h. used when it approved funding for the wuhan institute of virology back in 2016. we now know that the research we paid for helped chinese researchers engineer different versions of coronaviruses. we also need to know why the wuhan inst