s. policy right now is playing with fire. the u. s. scenes to for years ago have been doing anything up to the point of really violating or clearly rejecting one trying to principle. for example, the u. s. has invited to taiwan to the democracy meet last year, which is chinese. i has the people, the one again, and that is a violation of the one time the principal, the u. s. seems to be you know, 4th in china to concede in trade use to and it's position of russia about century bush and so on. looks like the china has not conceded during the last few talks and the u. s. if not, we need 2 options, but to escalate the matter further. the big group of nations is becoming increasingly appealing to more member states with the president. now of a jerry in africa was largest gas exporter saying that the country is ready to join the block. but then to boon said, the move would help. distance is country from polarizing global conflicts. we need ricks firstly because it allows us to move away from the attraction of the 2 poles . and secondly, we

s. policy. and it is european policy that has allowed oil rich countries to thrive during the circumstances. iran is now exporting all of its oil all the way that it can produce at a very high price. that is way not, is sounding, it's oil much more easily today than before. so the united states is hurting it while attempting to hurt russia. the united states is not only assisting iran and venezuela, but the united states is creating an economic crisis at home. so saudi arabia obviously benefits, and we don't know where this will take saudi arabia. but whatever land we look at this situation, it is the americans and europeans that lose as the digital world faces and acute shortage of semi conducted ships, russia is set to become one of the key suppliers of ne, on a gas used in digital and medical devices that is currently deficit with moscow set to launch new production facilities. as rachel blevins reports, global shortage of semiconductor chips has impacted industries across the board from smar

s. policy. and to some sort of crisis or conflict, or use it as a pretext to increase aggressive military activity in or around the taiwan straits . can be referred to the so called one china policy, which has existed in its current form since $979.00. when washington switched recognition from type paid to beijing, the u. s. officially acknowledges beijing as the only legitimate government for the whole china, including taiwan. however, this, as well as cause for the peaceful resolution of the taiwan issue, hasn't prevented us from entailing an official relations with ty, pay and sending alms to the island despite the u. s. caning policies, as it doesn't violate the one china policy. beijing doesn't seem to buy it. china wars and warns it will respond if the potential visit goes ahead. when they say so, we would like to warn the u. s. side once again, that the chinese side is ready. the chinese people's liberation army will never sit idly by and china will certainly take a resolute response and e

s, claiming their policies visit doesn't violate to be one. china policy basing does not seem to buy it, trying to warns it will respond if the potential visit goes ahead. when they say so, if we would like to warn the u. s. side once again, that the chinese side is ready. the chinese people's liberation army will never sit idly by and china will certainly take a resolute response and effective countermeasures to safeguard its sovereignty and territorial integrity ties in general tension. so run highest and support to merge last week that pelosi plans to visit high one during her asia trip. as the trip began the plane reportedly carrying the u. s. how speaker became the most tracked on the fight radar, playing tracking size before it disappeared from the map? that's despite tie, one not being included in police officials trip artillery. professor at the paris school of technology and business, benjamin cio believes the trip adds to the increasing us pressure on china. us policy right now is playing with fire. the u. s. scenes 2 free years ago have been doing anything up to the point o

s. policy. the u. s. one china policy remains. he says, and this was addressed during president biden's phone call with president she last week in which president biden made absolutely clear that the u. s. policy is unchanging when it comes to taiwan and also, and changing when it comes to its relationship with china. nevertheless, john kirby says, china is adapting a threatening posture and his express concern about any misunderstandings as he put it that could arise out of this heightening of tension on for a short break here now to sierra, when we come back, the u. s. government promises more than a 1000000000 dollars to help people affected by extreme weather, but many is too little too late. and the al jazeera exclusive will take you on patrol with nigeria, security forces, as they hunt for oil feet, sport. ah, the journey has begun. the fee for world copies on its way to the catholic group. your travel package today. hello, they will scott in north america where severe storms affecting the u. s. southeast . of course, the wo

s. policy. they just care about themselves. they don't care about the problem of ordinary people in other countries . i think it is wrong to just do what the u. s. wants, policy should respect the will of the taiwanese people are sitting there, maybe try to terrify us. rather it's so many times. okay. duct, the old story, the oh, with commune we come on. oh, well, the way it will somewhat affect i one, but will it affect our daily normal lives? i personally think it will not, at least for the next 2 years. so what we're seeing play out now is this ripple effect, this very brief trip by nancy pelosi and whether intentional or not days. that creates a ripple effects. of course, as we know, ripples turn into waves. these waves will be felt globally how significantly remains to be seen, but we're going to get a clearer picture in the coming allison days. some were analysis on this on a pretty interesting viewpoint, investigative journalist, edward sal believes nancy lucy's visit to taiwan, was meant as a distraction from america's

s. policy. the chinese military says it's on high alert and it's launched targeted military actions around. so i want to, i want to fence ministry, says the drills of violated the islands sovereignty and breached to un rules project for as a journalist base in beijing. and he says, china's president wants to highlight the country's military strength on an international scale. well, that has been very strong reaction from china as it been expected, vice foreign minister see fung summons the u. s. ambassador to china, nicholas burns, to lodge stern representations and protests. the foreign ministry also issued a statement echoing a lot of what we've been hearing the build up to this visit. but also in particular to say that the executive branch of the u. s. government had the responsibility to stop this visit from going ahead and the china does not accept that this is an unofficial visits and part of long standing u. s. policy on the military front moments after nancy pelosi touch, dan and i pay t

let me says, policies as a to tie one goes against the u. s. one china policy. i think that does, and the statements do contradict the one china policy do contradict official us policy statements. and i think the united states has kind of walked a type rope ever since the recognition of the people's republic of china. i believe that the recognition of the people's republic of china as the sole representative of china and the chinese people, was done less out of respect for common sense and decency. and the republic of china is so small, in comparison to the norms of international law, which dictates successive states. clearly states that the people's republic of china should be the only successor states. there is kind of this push for a new cold war. and this policy that we've been, the one china policy is kind of one of the last bastions of peace and tranquility between the united states and china and the united states and the rest of the world. earlier my colleagues always to say, discuss pelosi as a to tie one without correspondence. rachel blevins. hello. sh

s. policy towards the island hasn't changed. but as john becomes increasingly assertive, is the u. s. going to have to pick aside and drop this so called strategic ambiguity? i don't think it's time to drop strategic ambiguity quite yet. at the united states clearly has changed its attitude toward the one china policy, and this began under the trumpet ministration. but the biden administration has picked up on this idea that since 1979 united states has been too sensitive to china's hypersensitivity. and really, what remains of the one china policy is an american commitment not to support taiwanese independence. and to recognize only be jing as the government of the people's republic of china. but outside of that, we are now sending more leaders to taiwan. we are baking more sales to taiwan, and we're welcoming taiwanese officials into official american government buildings . so the one china policy, the core of it, is still there, but the style and meaning of it, the seriousness with which it's taken, that clearly has changed. could talk until that very clear. thanks for joining us.

this in no way represents any change in us policy. the u. s. one china policy remains. he says, and this was addressed during president biden's phone call with president she last week in which president biden made absolutely clear that the u. s. policy is unchanging when it comes to taiwan and also unchanging when it comes to its relationship with china. nevertheless, john kirby says, china is adapting a threatening posture and he's express concern about any misunderstandings as he put it that could arise out of this heightening of tension. ah, until mccray, with the headlines here on al jazeera, the leader of ellicott. i'm an o hittie has been killed in a ca, drones strike in afghanistan, in a televised address announcing the strike president joe biden said us intelligence officials tracked our hittie to home and downtown cobble where he was hiding from, hired, easy coordinated al qaeda's branches and are all round the world, including setting priorities, we're providing operational guidance that call for inspired attacks against us targets. he made videos including th

s. policy. china is launched. targeted military actions around tie one armored vehicles was seen patrolling the chinese port city of german across the street from taiwan. the u. s. could soon be selling military hardware worth $5000000000.00 to saudi arabia and the united alabama. let's say departments approved the sale of patriot missiles and related equipment to saudi arabia and a deal valued at about $3000000000.00. yelton's warning parties have agreed to extend a 4 month truce for a further 2 months hours before it was due to expire. you as president joe biden says, the agreement between the government and the hoodies is an importance to have the you are state departments wanting that the killing of all hired a leader aimen elza, laurie in ascom madigan, drawn strike may prompt the group supporters to target's u. s, facilities and citizens. new details have emerged about the killing and afghanistan on sunday. it was reportedly struck by to hell fire missiles. and it was staying on a balcony in the central cabal. the 1st cargo ship carrying green to leave ukraine . since russia invaded m

s. policy, it was for 50 years engagement with china october now. as seen as a big danger from the united states. horner view. this is quite a dramatic jane. a sentiment echoed by conservative media in the us. tensions still rising around taiwan, china halting, some ties with the we need to be strong. that's what shine understands. it's not words. it's not press releases, it's actual strength and presence in the region, a delicate balancing act for washington, and it's longstanding policy of strategic ambiguity. the practice of being intentionally ambiguous on the status of taiwan, which china seas as a break away province. it's going to continue. we're going there, we're going to rub up against each other. the chinese in us are going to rub up against each other, not just in the military, but in the economic realm. it whole range of issues and you kind of cold war between 2 superpowers. ok, let's get the latest now from d. w correspondence out on han in type. hey, good to see you. a tie. one says these drills appeared to simulate a chinese attack.

s. policy, they just care about themselves. they don't care about the problem of ordinary people in other countries. i think it is wrong to just do what the us wants. policy should respect the will of the taiwanese people. i soon, though, maybe try to clarify us. rather, it's so many times. okay, duct the old story, the always come, you know, we come on. oh, well, the way it will somewhat affect i one, but will it affect our daily normal lives? i personally think it will not at least for the next 2 years. so what we're seeing play out now is this ripple effect is the shortest of visit by nancy pelosi and you know that the 1st us how speak it's a visit taiwan in 25 years. and as when i ripples tend to waves the how and these ways will be felt globally, but how significantly we're gonna have to wait and see in the next few hours in days. yeah, we certainly will. i'm sure i won't be too long until we see the immediate reaction, at least nikki, thanks very much. ortiz nikia what you're saying with this investigative journalist edwar

s. policy by promising military support. if china tried to invade are you willing to get involved militarily to defend taiwan? if it comes to that, yes, you are. that's the commitment we made. the u. s. as china is the one disrupting the status quo. over the past year, she jan ping has provoked taiwan with incursions into its air space and calls for an end to taiwanese self rule. fool ones. the historical mission of the reunification of the motherland must be and will surely be realised. negotiate a jing, seize the island as a chinese territory temporarily occupied by the political airs of those who lost the chinese civil war. 1949. since then, taiwan has governed itself, running regular military and civilian drills to prepare for a possible chinese invasion. to pass that china has laid out off is neither a free and democratic way of life. the taiwan no sovereignty for 23000000 people. many in the west see it as a fight between democracy and authoritarianism. but that's not the only reason why the u. s. is involved. taiwan i

this in no way represents any change in us policy. the u. s. one china policy remains, he says, and this was addressed during president biden's phone call with president sheet last week in which president biden made absolutely clear that the u. s. policy is unchanging when it comes to taiwan and also unchanging when it comes to its relationship with china. nevertheless, john kirby says, china is adapting a threatening posture and he's express concern about any misunderstandings as he put it that could arise out of this heightening of tension. the head of the rounds, atomic agency says his country has the ability to produce a nuclear bomb. it doesn't plan to well, hubbard, islam. it's remarks kind of hours before the us announced fris sanctions on entities involved in runs, oil and pitcher, chemical, trade alley. hashem reports. it was a rare announcement from iran's atomic agency. chief mohammed, his slammy comments, which i could those made recently by another senior government figure it so whether it is no secret that we have become a nuclear

s. policy on china is what she's hinting at. and that could mean taking a toughest dance, but that could also mean after the failure to get that trans atlantic trade agreement together, that there could be individual steps that could amount to something like a closer trade for a while. and i'm at the foreign minister also said that germany had abandoned its long how the belief in the concept of change through trade. what does she mean by that? this is very interesting because this is the question that i'm going to michael. the former german sansa avoided during this final months of being in office when she was asked with the example of china. whether that was proof that it, that this concept had failed. she simply didn't want to answer that very question. and here and alina babcock is stating that quite clearly, and what she means is having less trade reliance as she cited ukraine. and with germany's europe's heavy reliance on ross and gas as a negative example. and in relation to china. that's my mean, she is her argument to ha

s. has always subscribed to china as one china policy. that means that recognizes china, which means that tie one does really have diplomatic ties with the u. s. so theoretically the u. s. does not recognize taiwan on an international stage or diplomatically now a high level visit like this in turns. and as being translated here us that the u. s. recognizes tie one and legitimizes tie one as its own entity with its own government. and that is something that china definitely awesome ones. nancy pelosi has mentioned is 3rd in line to the u. s. presidency though this kind of a high level visit. it's really irking china on this because it's basically saying that you know, that while the u. s. s. it subscribes to china's policy that i want as part of china surgery. at the same time, it's not towing the line when it calls on the u. s. not to take such such actions. and this also comes at a time and washington and beijing. tensions are. i'd highs and beijing and taiwan ty, paid tensions are at high to their relationship has deteriorated since 201

this in no way represents any change in us policy. the u. s. one china policy remains, he says, and this was addressed during president biden's phone call with president she last week in which president biden made absolutely clear that the u. s. policy is unchanging when it comes to title.

this in no way represents any change in us policy. the u. s. one china policy remains, he says, and this was addressed during president biden's phone call with president she last week in which president biden made absolutely clear that the u. s. policy is unchanging when it comes to taiwan and also unchanging when it comes to its relationship with china. nevertheless, john kirby says, china is adapting a threatening posture and he is express concern about any misunderstandings as he put it that could arise out of this heightening of tension. the head of a runs atomic agency says his country has the ability to produce a nuclear bomb. that doesn't plan to bahama to salamis. remarks came hours before the us announced frish sanctions on entities involved in a rounds, oil and pitcher a chemical tried, and a hush reports. it was a rare announcement from iran's atomic agency chief mohammed, his slummy comments, which i could those made recently by another senior government figure it so by the it is no secret that we have become a nuclear threshold stat

policy, right. you either recognize china or you recognize taiwan and the u. s. subscribes to that policy where it doesn't have diplomatic size. it's i want but the same time and according to u. s. lloyd has to help. so i want to protect itself. if china invades not china is very clearly said that i want is part of it. surgery and a visit like this, in a sense, gives taiwan legitimacy as its own entity where it's has its own government. one is a country or an island us want to pull it with a 24000000 people. it would democratically elect their government. so china is always it said the tie one rules itself by the same time, it is part of china. so now this visit by nancy pelosi is seen as the u. s. legitimizing sy, one as being its own entity rather than being part of china. and so that's, you know, raising tensions on either side. and so china's had lots of strong words has made some aggressive moves, being incursions in to time wants aerospace or chest on that line between taiwan and china and sending warships over there. but it also has the power to economica

s. will pay a price if policy travels to taiwan. washington is urging beijing to act responsibly . santana, silly with haven't quincy fact. recently the u. s. has claimed this commitment to the one china policy back she lives has been back tracking blaring and ha, now the one china principal and the u. s. has also gone against its commitment on maintaining non official ties with the taiwan region. he has upgraded its level of contact with taiwan and he has increased our sales to taiwan. so on that, many people on the inside have been very clear about dis, domestically and internationally, and a half point to that. the danger of those actions, sleazy jewish, patrick focus more from beijing. one of the things that's been talked about in the u. s. is concerned over whether all china really grasp the concepts of separate branches of government in the us and the foreign ministry here in beijing address not to day spokesperson. watching said that when there is a provocative visit to taiwan by a us politician, it cannot be considered unoffi

s. foreign policy and unjustified use of force against other states. that's just not the sort of shooting me me.

s. policy and into some sort of crisis. artistic. aaron take a closer look at the consequences of policies visit to taipei. china is already taking action as it warned it would fall out from pillows. these whirlwind trip has been swift and brutal, so quite rightly. people are asking the question, we have seen the chinese authorities take multiple economic actions against individual chinese companies. an entire sectors of the economy. taiwan has already paid your visit and is likely to continue to do so. with the coming days of week. what concrete tangible benefits could be promised. hi juan. offset the cost of your trip. a tricky question. slickly deflected because she knew exactly what she'd done and americans have made a bit of a habit of doing things like this, throwing others under the bus in service of their own goals, and the consequences over this brief trip are already taking hold global market so spooked and the largest military drills around high one in decades. ah but it might prove that the economic measures imposed by china will hurt tie one. the most fading has already banned

s. policies are, are hypocritical. and in this case, it has to do with power politics as well as money. and only if it suits united states where they use the human rights of argument and talk in terms of democracy when in fact, it's not practicing democracy itself, particularly or at home. counting is underway in kenya's presidential election. but as it waits to find out who it actually will actually lead in the next election and leave the country, that is the whole area is dealing with role rather slightly bigger issues. but in at least out of a growing terror threat in the region. apparently, i'll, cade is most significant affiliates have been digging in their heels with all his poll asleep now explores. this was seen one of the most visually contested election in kenya's history. the nation is divided over who should lead the country. but if there is one thing that canyons can agree on it that their government with american assistance is failing in its fight against tara one, it's been 3 and a half years since the l

s. policy if about promoting democracy and more about exerting global influence and power protection. i think that hypocrisy does lead to a drop in trust, but i don't think there's that much trust there to begin with. i think the saudi government understands exactly what they're dealing with with the united states. i follow the money. i think the defense industry is the biggest export that the united states has even bigger than energy and even bigger than agriculture. and tunisia specifically is an example of a country that has been extremely useful to the united states, certainly as a recipient of military hardware. america's role in the world to, to control things to interfere with countries that are doing what we tell them to do. this is where fundamental power is exercised politically in this country. and so they're not about democracy. they are about influence, arm sales, and having allies that will obey. well, that brings us to the end of this bulletin for most toys and breaking news. it turn websites had to eat on common. i'll be back to the top of the album with more updates t

s. government focus on foreign policy. one is at the behalf of military industrial complex. these are defend contractors that make money when the u. s. goes to war, when the u. s. involve military action and they spend millions on law being there the most in among the most influential lobbying groups in the entire country, of course, base for on people to war as much as they possibly can. war is good for their business. so that's one reason that politicians go towards towards foreign policy. you, the reason is to distract those, and biden domestic policy has been a train wreck is just more taxing and more spending on stupid welfare programs that nobody wants. what the only, that's the reason that that foreign policy is the perfect distraction. instead, we should be focusing on 2 things. cutting taxes and cutting spending, reducing the size, the scope, and the power of government, and getting government entirely out of our way. gustavo petro columbia's new leftist president, says the problem of drug trafficking is no longer just a u. s. colombian bilateral issue, but now it's

s. policy chains that order to pay millions of dollars of damages for their role and the opioid crisis in the state of a higher.

michael maloof, a former senior security policy analyst in the office of the u. s. secretary of defense says that nobody seemed to verify what they were shooting at before firing . i noticed in that film and i studied in earlier, that there was no one with binoculars to verify what they were shooting that they probably just saw people with something on mountain, on the shoulder. and they just assumed and you're supposed to positively identify targets. clearly they did not, and the fact to that you're, you're, the journalists were and clearly mark press designations on them. makes us very reprehensible. i also think too they didn't, they just don't care. they're just a mean a and not verify and anything. and that's and to be allowed to do this and may high profile. i'll jesse are a journalist, sharina block law was shot dead wall covering an israeli army operation in the west bank. a review by the u. n's office for human rights concluded that the deadly shots were fired by israeli forces. allegation, television has denied michael maloof again says israel should face

s. government is running right now. a foreign policy is opinions, seeing that they need to turn into military expensive, costly, military action immediately. and that's where i see the problem. right now the united states is over spending on a lot of just stupid and pointless welfare and military programs. and those are all expensive programs, and in order to fund them, they're borrowing a lot of money from china. now, if china ever refused to roll over the debt, the united states would be in a huge situation that have to cut back a lot of these programs. so in order to keep wasting money on the stupid programs, they have to stay on good terms with china. so that's why they're even though 99.999 percent of americans agree that taiwan should be a separate country. the federal government can't really say so publicly because they're financially dependent on china to fund their stupid welfare programs. moving now ukraine, where ukrainian forces have reportedly suffered major losses. neither towns of pesca and of the africa. these are used b

s. policy on taiwan that the u. s. does recognize the one china policy and that the, the, the visit really does not signal any change in that. but he was very clear in calling china's action in taiwan straight, an escalation, you know, he talked about how the response in taiwan straight is disproportionate, is extreme and it's escalate. re, he said that china had used hello, sees visit as a pretext to increase its military activity. and he said this was not only, not something that the u. s. wanted, this was also something that regional neighbors do not want to see happen. now, earlier at the east asia summit as well, he made that point. he achieved, he said china's actions in the taiwan strait a flagrantly provocative. and he said china were seeking to intimidate, not only ty, one, but also its neighbors. and he talked not just about the military exercises that china is carrying out a wrong tie one. but he also talked about the it's use of economic coercion is use of cyber warfare. he said, all these were an escalation

s. has claimed this commitment to the one china policy box wise has been back tracking, blotting, and harder than not the one china principal. the u. s. has also gone against commitment on maintaining non official ties with the taiwan region. it has upgraded its level of contact with taiwan and he has increased sales to taiwan. so on that, many people on the inside have been very clear about this domestically and internationally. and to have pointed out that age of those actions please. patrick falk has more from beijing. one of the things that's been talked about in the us is concerned over whether all china really grasped this concept of separate branches of government in the u. s. and the foreign ministry here in beijing address that today's folks person watching said that when there is a provocative visit to taiwan by a u. s. politician, it cannot be considered unofficial, especially when that politician is for number 3, u. s. government official. and especially when she is traveling to taiwan on a military aircraft watching also address the issue of precedence, referring to for my house

s. policy after the collapse of the u. s, i saw it became the only super power and american politicians increasingly referred to the usa is exceptional mission, to enlighten other nations and teach them to live properly. and so may disagree with our belief monday of accepting their car because we have shown a willingness for the sacrifice of blood and treasure stand up, not only from our own maryland, but for the interest of all. i mean i'm state of washington. c. g is the lead katie loose banging and i say to me, you might see that because it is now right progress donasia subway before the racial screening ration right now. you guys play during the show room was number. i'm beat almost at the ethical me attending because you said you seeing a democracy, some numbers from supposed to been told. everybody else are barbarians. and actually everybody on our slave the u. s. in iraq and always other countries, bombing and killing and raping and loading, stealing and all these other things over throw on government left and right.

s. policy. and after the collapse of the u. s. i saw it became the only super power and american politicians increasingly referred to the usa is exceptional mission, to enlighten other nations and teach them to live properly. so may disagree with what i believe over exception hard because we have shown a willingness for the sacrifice of blood and treasure to stand up, not only from our own rivers, but for the interest of all. i mean, i must get the flashing seizures domain katie, still spring in motion. i say to me, when you might say that because it is now right. because donation hedwood law, the racial screening racialism will be right with you guys play during ensure and was number b and listed that i think will be attending physically. and then you seeing a democracy, hamlin loose from forcible told me, everybody else are barbarians. and actually everybody on our slave the u. s. in iraq and always other countries, bombing and killing and raping and looting, stealing and always other things over throw on government left and rig