arbitrator was other john from a swedish attorney cuyahoga represented the claimant vattenfall and sabina conrad represented the federal repub. of germany. that involved train 4700000000 euros in damages as a consequence of the 13th amendment claimants lost their production licenses for the criminal plant and for doing and drumstick plant there was simply withdrawn. the dispute does not concern germany's right as such to face up to and rather this dispute concerns the manner in which germany has chosen to be implemented stay self-sufficient and to stay to prop to protect claimants investments in particular concerns jim his failure to pay any compensation at all. the heart and so most in this protection treaties is to provide protection against expropriation . the difficulty however when we talk about indirect expropriation is to draw the line between expropriation on the one and legitimate governmental measures on the other. and there is no easy way to draw this line to make this distinction. so of course one could say that the protection that in the esters enjoyed under the treaty is could infl