welcome back we continue our conversation with joe sacco about his book paying the land one of the things you talk about in the book are the you know as you bring in these outside extraction industries and and of course the imposition of the canadian government itself is it creates disputes within indigenous communities and of course that classic ability to divide those communities very much a part of westward expansion in the united states and you and i visited big or the big horn battle and of course that was the crows who were aiding custer and and the cavalry so but talk about those divisions because that's an important part of your book well. as i mentioned if people are wage laborers and those are the only wages there are some people who look at resource extraction as the way out of poverty and they see the resource extraction community as they're suspicious of it on many levels but also the resource extraction community will bring in. gifts. they'll help subsidize schools give hockey equipment they will keep the winter roads clear so they bring in certain goods and other people are

the sacco's would never have been able to market this product without authorization. the f.d.a. has to control and regulate every single drug put on the market it authorized the use of oxycontin as a painkiller without a problem. some of the same f.d.a. officials involved in regulating the drug. would wind up leaving f.d.a. and taking higher paying jobs for purdue pharma and other drug companies we call that the revolving door i think they should have figured out earlier than what was going on and to this day some of these same f.d.a. officials are still at the f.d.a. and rather than saying we made a horrible mistake we have to change our policies they haven't changed their policies they keep approving more opioids. it's a big day for oklahoma the attorney general's teams are facing the lawyers of the 4 companies being seated a judge has to rule whether there's enough evidence to go to trial. proof pharmaceutical activists johnson and johnson we sued the ones that we knew about it did business and falsely market it in oklahoma my goal is to let the trees come out i really hope t

at any, right sacco vanzetti really does become the case where a lot of these cases continue into thethey are ultimately executed in 1927. even though, once again, you are having these debates the rest of the government is still to go against the radicals who are challenging these laws. >> in today's modern court, justices antonin scalia was part of the majority. upholding the right to burn the american flag. in the final clip, we will have a bit of justice scalia talking about that decision. listen. >> you can be using your first amendment rights and it can be abominable that you are using your first amendment rights. i'll defend you right to use it. but i will not defend the appropriateness of the manner in which you are using it now. that could be very wrong. >> he was praised by some, criticized by others for his decision in the flag burning case. i imagine that you thought the act itself was reprehensible. >> i would have sent that guy to jail if i was king. >> but by your ruling, he had the right to burn the flag. >> that is with the first amendment means. you have the right to