you're familiar with the case and the regulatory process that the epa inflicted on the sackett family. for those not sure, let me recap the facts. this case, before i do that captures a disturbing clarity of the many problems of the modern administrative state. they purchased land and planned to build a hole on it but as they werepreparing the land for construction the epa sent them a compliance order claiming that the sackett construction was prohibited because their land was covered by the clean water act. even though it was several lots away from any body of water they asserted the land qualified as navigable waters and they could not fill the land as necessary to build their home. they ordered the sacketts to restore the land to an epa approved condition or face up to $75,000 per day in fines. here's the kicker. the epa denied the sackett's an administrative hearing and then argued that they lacked any right to challenge the epa's actions in court. it seemed woodrow wilson's dream of the so-called experts being free of any judicial review had come true. the case made its way to th

you're familiar with the case and the regulatory process that epa inflicted on the sackett family. for those not sure, let me recap the facts. this case, before i do that captures a disturbing clarity of many problems of the modern administrative state. they purchased land and planned hole on it but as they were preparing the land for construction the epa sent them a order claiming that the sackett construction was prohibited because their land was covered by the clean water act. it was several lots away from any body of water they as rted the land qualified navigable waters and they could not fill the land as necessary to build the home. they ordered the sacketts to estore the land to an epa approved condition or face up to $75,000 per day in fines. here's the kicker. epa denied the sackett's an administrative hearing and then argued that they lacked any challenge the epa's actions in court. woodrow wilson's dream of the so-called experts being review had judicial come true. the case made its way to the supreme court, on whether the challengeany right to the epa's actions in court

just as agencies must provide due process to parties like the sacketts, judges must faithfully enforce the constitution's structural which exist to preserve individual liberty and personal property rights. and justice agencies owe the public fair notice of the rules, courts must interpret statutes and the constitution as the public would understand them according to the plain meaning of the text. due process, fair notice, originalism, and texturallism. that's what this is all about. [applause] mr. mcgahn: justice scalia's tragic death put these issues front and center in the 2016 election. -- in my lifetime i can't remember a presidential , election that turned so critically on the role of judges. the president knew this which is why he issued his list of candidates for the supreme court. he wanted the american people to know exactly the type of justice he would select. you may have missed it but it came out recently the president announced today that he's refreshing his list of potential supreme court nominees, so it's public, and if i could just beg your indulgence for a second, we a

. >>> and two sides to bob sackett. beloved dad on tv and controversial comic on stage.with the comedian as he returns to both roles. >>> and they're one of the biggest bands in the uk and a cult favorite for those in the know. the band elbow's last two records went number one across the pond. we'll talk about their newfound success and they'll perform in morning sessi in ing saturday sessions. that's ahead. >>> the president tweeted about franken on friday. the minnesota senator is accused of forcibly groping and kissing leeann tweeden back in 2006. >> the president has not spoken publicly about republican senator candidate roy moore. on friday the press asked press secretary sarah sanders about whether thegations against the president should be investigated? >> i think in one case senator franken has admitted to wrongdoing and the president hasn't. that's a very clear distinction. >> a senate ethics panel will investigate senator al franken. >>> the tax reform bill cleared the committee on friday. it was a straight party line vote. there are both winners and losers und