we avoid at least a government shutdown but i don't want to call house speaker john boehner a sacrificial lamb but some say he did this to get the stop gap spending bill through. >> that's probably part of it. a lot of it is he was tired of having to fight constantly with the conservatives in his caucus. what they'll pass will get us through december 11th and the big question is what happens then? you have to raise the debt ceiling and fund the government. it's going to be an interesting december and those budget talks you mentioned will begin as soon as this cr gets through but they're fighting right now over who's involved in those budget talks. democrats don't want to be excluded from that. republicans wanted to start with boehner and mcconnell and the president so it's not a great sign that they can't even agree on who's going to be in the room at this point. so my hopes for a big sweeping budge deal to get through not super high. >> what will this budget deal look like? what kind of inclusions are we going to see? planned parenthood looks done. the democrats get on board. house speaker jo

he's a sacrificial lamb. i'm not following you, dad. it'll look like they're latching on to this to excuse themselves for allegations that they've ignored in the past. oh. well, thanks, harvard. you asked. that isn't fair. no it isn't, nicky. but it isn't simple, either. if it goes public, it hurts the church. henry: no kidding. i'm in the middle of a fund drive for comforting community. what's going to happen to all those senior citizens we serve? so what do you think, dad? i was kind of hoping to find out what you guys think. it's a tough one. i mean, i can see it from both sides. yeah, me, too. lawyers, what do you expect? well, i'll takside. it stinks. i'm not talking about the legality. it's not a question of due process, it's an ethical issue. yeah. is the church making the father pay fore a ormer sins? yeah. on the other hand, father mcmurray isn't resisting, right? right. of course not. he loves the church. he's willing its fake the sacrifice. are we being selfish for not wanting to lose him? are we putting our wishes before the

involved him and the obstruction of justice, and i think they had decided he was going to be the sacrificial lambn dean was in way over his head. and then when he realized this ship is going down, he jumped. >> this morning, without the president's approval, dean issued a statement in which, among other things, he declared some may hope or think i will become a scapegoat in the watergate case. anyone who believes this, dean added, does not know me, know the true facts, nor understand our system of justice. >> do you have information implicating president nixon in a cover-up? >> i have no comment this morning. i'm sorry. >> we started having secret conversations with john dean. he was disclosing this sprawling conspiracy, to put it mildly. >> when i broke rank and started dealing with the prosecutors in early april, i had the naive belief that, by breaking rank, they would do likewise. >> john dean kept upping the ante. i want immunity. okay, i'll tell you this. as we were leaving, i just remember this. he said, john has something to tell you. and dean told us that this same group had broken into

arguably to avoid the sacrificial lamb. here's where the comparison with 2000 should end. the pan blue split handed the election to the dpt whereas the election in 2016. less of a focus on cross strait relations since 2000 if anything it's an indebt influence in the 2016 election. i don't expect recent attention to the '92 consensus to change that election focus in the long term. another point that i think has been largely overlooked is james sung's motivations are different between 2000 and 2016. i would argue his rationale for entering '16 is similar to entering '12 and that's to bolster his party. the only difference in 2016 is that the weakness of the other candidate makes him a more viable candidate in 2012. a reminder he only received 2.77% of the vote in 2012. other sort of clear differences between 2000 and 2016, the dpt candidate is not painted as the one that's extreme but hung is playing this role largely because of her positions on cross strait relations. she's not appealing to the sort of blue base but the deep blue. the growth in taiwanese identification even

turns all the people responsible of the corporation can get off then they will throw out the sacrificial lamb and keep going so it is really important to keep going as an entity as well as the individual. we had a tremendously difficult doing that by we if federal government over the last tender 15 years because of the problems that we talked about so some areas have been appropriate for prosecution like environmental crime they do a good job. but with financial crimes they do a horrible job and in fact, they have replaced prosecution with the idea of the deferred prosecution is better than non prosecution which is basically a deal not to criminally prosecute in exchange not to violate the law lot in the future which is of much of the promised big cheshire not supposed to do that even without a deal in the first place. with that is the norm happening every year since 2000 much worse over the last five and seven years. another contender is the case with hsbc. they were involved in money-laundering at a scale to get your head around hundreds of billions of dollars they we're doing that on behal

time and time again we see them being the sort of sacrificial lambs in this process, and i guess i wonder the base will extract now that boehner is departing. >> i don't know. but it's a good question because they'll think of something new, i'm sure. and to people on the radical end of the republican caucus in the house of representatives i don't think they feel -- excuse me. -- that there is much of a price to be paid for a government shutdown. certainly not with respect to their own re-elections because they come from districts where the vast majority of their voters or a majority anyway of their voters are going to think that a shutdown is fine, that they stood up to obama and they stood up to the democrats. and even nationally for the last shutdown that ted cruz led they didn't pay much of a price. you know, other events took precedence, and they didn't pay any price for that. so i think if the establishment wants them to walk to the cliff they'll walk to the cliff and they'll take the establishment over the cliff and the establishment might think that they're going to pay a price and

arguably to avoid the is sacrificial lamb. here's where the comparison with 2000 should end. the pan blue split handed the election to the dpt whereas the election in 2016. less of a focus on cross strait relations since 2000 if anything it's an indebt influence in the 2016 election. i don't expect recent attention to the '92 consensus to change that election focus in the long term. another point that i think has been largely overlooked is james sung's motivations are different between 2000 and 2016. i would argue his rationale for entering '16 is similar to entering '12 and that's to bolster his party. however he's a more viable candidate than in 2012. a reminder he only received 2.77% of the vote in 2012. other sort of clear differences between 2000 and 2016, the dpt candidate is not painted as the one that's extreme but hung is playing this role largely because of her positions on cross strait relations. she's not appealing to the sort of blue base but the deep blue. the growth in taiwanese identification even looking just since president cho took office, 20% growth of tho

sins so that we might become the righteousness of god. , thatyou to you, jesus you were the sacrificial lambat you died on the cross for the sins of man. thank you that three days later after they took that body off the cross and put it in a tomb, the tomb was empty because the fact that death could not keep you and through that resurrection power we find hope today. and your works. we are grateful that that is the hope for humanity. name.her today in your we are your people. the you would teach us. that you would use our guest today to help us know not just what to think, but how to think. help us today to show graciousness and love. thank you for the opportunity you have given us to learn how in this great nation we can do together what we could never do alone. we are grateful, father for the gift you have given us. we pray this in your name. amen. we thank the campus band for joining us today. looking really good. real quick, a few announcements this morning. i see that we have a lot of guests here with us today. we are grateful that you found your way here. a few announcements for the st

so pressler resigned, the sacrificial lamb needed to appease protestors and protect the school's gold-plated kennedy, duke's senior deputy director of athletics, spoke with us recently over the objections of administrators at his university, who told kennedy "it was not in duke's interest or his" to talk to us on camera. >> kennedy: i think that, in some quarters of the university administration, there was some belief that this may have happened. and that if that's the case, they had to respond. >> keteyian: but it turns out nothing did happen. >> kennedy: correct. >> keteyian: and mike's the only one to lose his job over this. >> kennedy: correct. >> keteyian: and as we sit here nine years later, what do you think of that? >> kennedy: i think that a lot of officials at the university have come to the realization, or came to the realization within a year or so, that probably mike shouldn't have lost his job. >> pressler: you got to run to the outside! >> keteyian: but he did. almost overnight, the reigning national coach of the year had become toxic, an untouchable in the world of college la