significant coverage on the bbc news website, where the situation was referred to as a crisis. that reflected saj id that reflected sajid javid's interpretation but was the bbc right to go along with its? a number of viewers thought not with this person writing: there was also another objection voiced by viewers such as barbara relating to the use of the term migrants. she recorded this video for us expending the problem as she saw it. the trouble with the word immigrant is that it's now used by governments with the object of illegal or economic to encourage the british people to feel negatively towards the people crossing the channel. if the bbc chose to use the word asylum seeker or refugee that would be much closer to the truth and it would not play into the hands of government ministers who have created under continuing to encourage the so—called hostile environment. on wednesday, home editor puts the number of those attempting the perilous journey gci’oss attempting the perilous journey across the channel into context. there are real concerns the risk these migrants are coming and the crimin

their partines and with republicans having a 53-47 majority and barr needing a simple majority of pass sajhis prospects look good. but everyone, what does this mean for the mueller probe? to me going into this, barr t saying i wantbe independent, we should allow mueller to do his job, be as transparent as possible. but on other questions, particularly when it came to issues of the border, at immin, and the shutdown, barr was taking a position that s similar t president trump's, kind ofsoontradicting of the independents there. i think that's a big question -- >> is that going to hurt him? >> how independent will he be as attorney general? >> did the answers hurt him? >> no, didn't hurt him, probably helps him with the republican side. but if you want to portray yourself as being independent it probably ds hurt you a little bit too. remember the reasovawe're having ncy as an attorney general is because president trump thought jeff sessions was too independent, shouldn't have recusedue himself from theer probe. >> because he's been down this road before you consider him a shoo-in? what's the