not water salesen. and we're seeing about $2 million in salary savings on the uses side as well as we don't anticipate having to dip into the contingency for power purchases. on clean power, the revenues are at budget. we're sell wag we expected to. on the uses, side, we have about $1 million in salary savings from vacancies and the $5.6 million use here is a deposit to reserves that was planned. you can see they're meeting the various objectives for debt service coverage. i'm happy to answer any questions. >> commissioners? anything? >> thank you. just a comment. the fact that we're selling more water than we planned to kind of gives us a windfall of r*f gnu and we talked before about one of the possible uses of that is to fund any conservation programs that we're not able to qualify under prior structures. and as we get into the next budget cycle, i will be looking to make sure that we do two things. one is assess what our consumptions are and that they are appropriately reflective of ongoing conserva